Preview

Dbq Compare And Contrast Jeffersonian Republicans And Federalists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
643 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dbq Compare And Contrast Jeffersonian Republicans And Federalists
Between 1801 and 1817, the two parties the Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists seemed to have changed their views on the issue of whether the constitution should be loosely interpreted, or strictly interpreted. The Democratic-Republicans originally prided themselves in having strict constructionist beliefs, but however, as time went on, they seemed to have adopted a broader outlook. The Federalists, who favored a looser perspective on the interpretation of the construction, adopted a more strict interpretation. Whenever the members of these parties had to change their perspective in order to suit their needs, they seemed to have no qualms in doing so.

Before Jefferson's own presidency, he was a large advocator of strict constitutionalism. In 1800, he wrote a letter to Gideon Granger, telling him that he believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution. He is a large advocator of state rights, and he states that he is not in favor of a strong national government. In the end of this letter, Jefferson states that "the true theory of the constitution is surely the wisest and best". (Document A)

In 1808, Jefferson follows the same view. In his letter to Samuel Miller, he strictly interprets the constitution as being the ultimate authority, and leaving the states the power that the government can not harness, such as anything to do with
…show more content…

He favored central power, national rights, etc. By the 1790s however, Madison's views seemed to change drastically. He became a stronger advocate of states' rights, and began to interpret the constitution more rigidly. As can be seen in Madison's message to Congress regarding an Internal Improvements Bill, March 1817, Madison explicitly states that he can not favor the bill, because there is no power expressed in the Constitution which gives him the right to do so. Therefore, Madison, like Jefferson was not firm in his beliefs either. (Document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why did Jefferson advocate a “strict” interpretation of the Constitution? Jefferson advocated a “strict” government in order…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By both definition and widespread perception the Jeffersonian-Republicans were strict constructionists, meaning they closely followed the framework of the Constitution. On the other hand, the belief was that Federalists, who thought the Constitution was open for interpretation, were loose constructionists. Although both the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison (Democratic-Republicans) mainly supported these theories, they, like other politicians of the time, often made exceptions to their “policies.”…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson proved himself a constructionist most of the time he was in office. In August of 1800, Jefferson's first year in office, he sent a letter to Gideon Granger (document A) stating his support for the constitution…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson originally began as a strict state’s rights advocate. He only accepted the Constitution with a guarantee of the Bill of Rights that reversed many Federalists policies, (Doc. A).Jefferson supported the separation of government and religion that can be seen in the Bill of Rights that promised freedom of religion. However as President he did not make major changes in the government.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Early in Jefferson’s first term, he had a vision for what the government should look like. He wanted a government without Federalists and Federalists Acts. Through these new plans he gave the factions more influence and raised taxes, which goes against his…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the 1800's, Jeffersonian Republicans thought that the federal government’s power was confined to the grants of the Constitution. On the other hand, the Federalists believed in the broad construction that gave the government any power that was not forbidden by the constitution. Despite the fact that the Jeffersonian Republicans believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and Federalists believe in a loose interpretation, these beliefs were misrepresented according to the party’s views on the authority of the government during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. During this time, the Jeffersonian Republicans beliefs were inverted with the beliefs of the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans leaned toward a loose interpretation and the Federalists leaned toward a strict one.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two main political parties in early America, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, fought many ideological and political battles from 1790 to 1810. Conflicts between these two parties grew out of their opposing ideologies the Democratic-Republicans supported states rights and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, whereas the Federalists favored a strong central government and a broader interpretation of the Constitution. However there are more than 3 major topics that I could talk about involving the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans between the years 1789 and 1812. Some of the topics are boring and some of the topics are pretty interesting.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many different views on how to run the government, it was hard to depict which parties’ group would be the strongest and the best fit to control the country: the Federalists’ or the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists’ wanted a very strong government to bring together the bickering states. On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans pictured more independent state governments to rule the people. Although they didn’t agree on many things they did have one idea in common, such as, both parties wanted to follow the Constitution, but in different ways.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of…

    • 4346 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the Federalists and Democratic differences were that they both had a different leader Federalists had Alexander Hamilton and Democratic Republicans leader was Thomas Jefferson. Federalists, lost interception of the constitution and they, and also the federal constitution. The Federalist was in charge to protect the Tarrifs. Federalist thought that it should be educated men who should own their own property and would also protect everyone's rights. The Democratic Republicans differences were that the they wanted the limit the government power.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison's Virginia Resolution declared that state legislatures had never surrendered their right to judge the constitutionality of federal actions and that they retained an authority called interposition. This authority enabled them to protect the liberties and rights of their citizens. An example of Madison expressing his will was when he stated "The General Assembly doth solemenly appeal to the like dispositions of the other states, in confidence that they will concur with this commonwealth in declaring, as it does hereby declare, that the acts aforesaid, are unconstitutional ; and that the necessary and proper measures will be taken by each, for co-operating with this state, in maintaining the Authorities, Rights, and Liberties, referred to the States respectively, or to the people." Madison wanted the people's civil liberties to be protected because he felt the Federal government was passing laws that were considered unconstitutional and violating citizen's rights and yet were still being enforced.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of Jefferson's strongest advocacies for the common citizen was his ideas o the rights of smaller government, i.e. that of the towns and states, over the power of the federal government. This dilution of power he believed would be more in the interest of the common citizen, because they would be able to better serve their own interests. Although Jefferson's idea of small government was effectively disbanded after the constitution was written, he still advocated constantly for the rights of states, although his arguments were often fruitless.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists believe in a strong federal system of governance, promotion of nationalistic government meanwhile the democratic- Republican believe in the promotion of the principles of republicanism over elitism. They both have different input of their philosophies too, the Democratic- Republicans believe and follow the Jeffersonian Democracy and Republicanism, while Federalist party follows Federalism, on the idea of industrialization and nationalism. Both parties also believed in liberty and freedom of the people. They opposed on every known issue. The Federalist Party believed in a strong central government while the Republican Party believed in the rights of the states. They reasoned saying that the liberty could only be protected if the power rested in the hands of the people. The Republicans had the view that the state could exercise powers only enumerated in the constitution. Federalists on other hand considered a loose reading of the constitution. They argued that state had the right to make laws necessary for the functioning of the government which were not forbidden by the…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On page 292 its states that " One difference between Federalists and Republicans concerned the basis of government power". It also states on page 292 " The Democratic-Republicans wanted to limit the government because they feared that a strong government would endanger people’s liberties". Page 292 "Republicans had sharply opposing views on the role ordinary people…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays