Preview

Strict Constructionist Dbq Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
770 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strict Constructionist Dbq Analysis
Loose/Strict Constructionist DBQ By both definition and widespread perception the Jeffersonian-Republicans were strict constructionists, meaning they closely followed the framework of the Constitution. On the other hand, the belief was that Federalists, who thought the Constitution was open for interpretation, were loose constructionists. Although both the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison (Democratic-Republicans) mainly supported these theories, they, like other politicians of the time, often made exceptions to their “policies.” During Jefferson’s Presidency, he often conveyed his strict constructionist stance regarding certain issues; therefore he followed the ‘defined’ ideals of the Democratic-Republican Party. After …show more content…
Often it was demonstrated that Federalists became more strict, while Republicans became increasingly loose. First, Federalist Daniel Webster demonstrated this change in political position in document D. In his speech, he opposed President Madison’s position regarding a mandated military draft. He claimed that Madison was acting outside the guidelines of the Constitution, which illustrated Webster’s change from a loose constructionist to more of a strict constructionist. Secondly, Jefferson, a self-proclaimed strict constructionist also joined the group of political hypocrites. For example, Jefferson’s most grand defiance of the Constitution of the United States was his approval of the Louisiana Purchase. Even though the Constitution didn’t necessarily allow for such action, Jefferson made an executive decision to pursue the idea of expanding America, and thus starting a westward movement. Apparently the success of the Louisiana Purchase must’ve altered Jefferson’s mindset, because eight years after his Presidency (1816), Jefferson wrote a letter to Samuel Kercheval (Doc. G), which gave support to exploring some change/further interpretation of the Constitution. Lastly, Republicans also at times slandered Madison for being too

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Thomas Jefferson was consistently inconsistent by switching from a strict constructionist view to a broad interpretation on the constitution to support his political views. Similarly, Jacksonian democrats occasionally altered their belief of being guardians of the political democracy, individual liberty, economic opportunity, and the Constitution to suit their purposes.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 10 Concepts

    • 2586 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Thomas Jefferson- was the Secretary of State. When Alexander Hamilton wanted to create a new national bank, Jefferson adamantly spoke against it. He felt it would violate states rights by causing a huge competitor for the state banks, then causing a federal monopoly. Jefferson's argument was that since the Constitution did not say Congress could create a bank they should not be given that power. This is the philosophy of strict construction. Thomas Jefferson's beliefs led to the creation of the political party, Democratic Republicans. They believed in an extremely weak central government, no special privileges for special classes, especially manufacturers, and did not believe in letting every white male the ability to vote, only those intelligent enough to make wise decisions.…

    • 2586 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the time of the Jefferson and Madison presidencies, the Democratic-Republicans were often considered to be strict constructionists. This is seen in multiple occasions in which the Presidents (both of which were Republicans) or other members of the party took actions from a strict constructionist stand-point. While in office, Jefferson reduced the size of the Navy and put limitations on the military, which was a strict constructionist view at the time. The Constitution only gave the Federal government the power to maintain a military, and Jefferson felt that the country could be maintained with a smaller force, thus why he limited it. Jefferson also did not run for a third term, following the two-term limit policy that Washington had ‘created.’ By respecting this element of the “un-written” Constitution, Jefferson was following a strict constructionist viewpoint. Also, Jefferson expressed a strict constructionist view in several personal letters. In one to Gideon Granger in 1800, he stated his own and the party’s intentions to get “a majority in the legislature of the United States, attached to the preservation of the federal Constitution,” and even stated in the letter that the Federalists loose constructionist views would be detrimental to the country (Document A). In another letter to Samuel Miller, a Presbyterian minister, in early 1808, he also clearly showed his strict constructionist views by stating that “certainly no power to…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis: The political and economic views of Hamiltonian Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans differed in terms of centralized or state governments, acts passed by congress, American liberty, and industries. Later on when the Republican party dominated the government after the War of 1812, their original ideals started to blend in with Federalists’ and the lines blurred.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson, for example, could not immediately abolish Adams' national bank because it would be too drastic a move for someone with his popularity, despite the fact that it was established without the Constitution granting that power to the federal government (Blum). Jefferson's most grand defiance of his strict interpretation of the Constitution was his purchase of the Louisiana Territory. Even though he was not given the power to purchase land in the Constitution, Jefferson couldn't pass up the opportunity to double the nation's size at a time of such large-scale westward movement. After his presidency (1816), Jefferson wrote a letter to Samuel Kercheval (document G) that gave his support for change to the Constitution with change to the times, which is a very far leap from claiming that nothing could be done in the national government without the Constitution granting them the power to do it. Madison is guilty of the same deviations from typical Republican strict constructionist policy. He was attacked by John Randolph (document F) for being too much like a Federalist, particularly when using the national government's power to set tariffs like the one proposed in 1816. This was not the first time Madison was attacked for his pseudo-Federalist policies. He received abundant criticisms…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This was considered broad constructionalism because normally Jeffersonians would try to limit military spending and expansion of their military, yet the decision to go to war was not changed. Most did not agree with the war, but it was most unpopular in New England where citizens were extremely dependent on trade.The Constitution stated that 2/3 must support the war before it can be declared but Jefferson believed he had the final decision (E). Federalists complained that the Consitution did not state anything about enforcing a draft, and that it would be similar to creating a dictator (D). Another way in which Federalists began to exhibit strict behaviors was by setting up the Hartford Convention. This showed that they were trying to secede from the war against Britain, but began the downfall of the Federalist party due to their disloyalty. All of these things show how each party gradually switched their views on the Constitutions…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    This paper explores five sources that outline the events leading up to Jefferson’s presidency, and the events during. Information is brought to light supporting claims Jefferson was indeed a great president. The articles touch on how Jefferson’s great morals and principles were related to his great decisions and in turn his greatness. The paper functions as a guide which highlights Jefferson’s remarkable reasoning, especially in difficult positions, through the use of understanding Jefferson’s thought process by means of quotes from Family Guardian Fellowship, as well as texts and readings pertaining to Jefferson. This research paper also counters claims of Jefferson’s mistakes, ineffectiveness, recklessness, and stupidity by the use of factual, reference information.…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    During both Jefferson’s and Madison’s presidential term, both the Republicans’ and the Federalists’ ideals did not always stay consistent to their previous, more defined beliefs. Jefferson felt it necessary during his presidency to restore the states’ rights that the Federalists previously took away, but he also considered what was good and beneficial to the nation, even if a few of the ideas were not strictly constitutional. During Madison’s presidency, while most Republicans still believed in the states rights, Congress desired a slightly looser interpretation of the Constitution, and created another Bank of the United States and protection tariffs, giving more power to the federal government. Also, although the Federalist Party was failing and they still did for the most part desire a broad interpretation of the Constitution, the New England delegates from the Hartford Convention showed that they now did not appreciate all of the power that Congress currently possessed.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1801 and 1817, the two parties the Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists seemed to have changed their views on the issue of whether the constitution should be loosely interpreted, or strictly interpreted. The Democratic-Republicans originally prided themselves in having strict constructionist beliefs, but however, as time went on, they seemed to have adopted a broader outlook. The Federalists, who favored a looser perspective on the interpretation of the construction, adopted a more strict interpretation. Whenever the members of these parties had to change their perspective in order to suit their needs, they seemed to have no qualms in doing so.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Early in Jefferson’s first term, he had a vision for what the government should look like. He wanted a government without Federalists and Federalists Acts. Through these new plans he gave the factions more influence and raised taxes, which goes against his…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    the tax. Resistance came to a climax in July 1794, when a U.S. marshal arrived in western…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the 1800's, Jeffersonian Republicans thought that the federal government’s power was confined to the grants of the Constitution. On the other hand, the Federalists believed in the broad construction that gave the government any power that was not forbidden by the constitution. Despite the fact that the Jeffersonian Republicans believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and Federalists believe in a loose interpretation, these beliefs were misrepresented according to the party’s views on the authority of the government during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. During this time, the Jeffersonian Republicans beliefs were inverted with the beliefs of the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans leaned toward a loose interpretation and the Federalists leaned toward a strict one.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were many forms of government through the 17th and 18th century. Two forms of government that were mainly used; were democracy and absolutism. Both of these government types were affective in their own ways, but also had various similarities and differences. Philosophers also helped with changing 17th and 18th century Europeans way of thinking; and view the teachings of the Catholic Church.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though both the Anti-Federalist and Federalist Constitution makers were aristocratic and wanted a government removed from the masses, their political philosophies differed greatly. Jefferson’s thinking was very progressive for his time in…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Jefferson often showed a strong dislike for the Federalist laws and programs, when he took office he left many of the Federalist programs intact, and except for revoking the excise tax, the Hamiltonian system was mostly left as it was. However, this act of Jefferson’s went against many of the political beliefs held by his party and himself. Jefferson and Hamilton’s philosophies differed greatly in that Jefferson adhered to a weak central government, with most of the power in the hands of the states. He believed that the federal government’s power should be restrained and limited, so that it would not be able to become tyrannical or try and undermine the power of the states and the people.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays