Preview

Neoclassical Liberal Democratic Theory and the American Constitution

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2665 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Neoclassical Liberal Democratic Theory and the American Constitution
Over past centuries there have been many different opinions, philosophies and approaches to government and politics demonstrated throughout the world. As time continues and humanity evolves, these approaches and opinions often change, yet their root philosophy, or ideological foundations, often remain. A political ideology can be defined as, “ a science of ideas: the study of the origins, evolution and nature of ideas… the application of human reason to economic, social and political changes”[1]. This notion of a classic ideology influencing modern government is not an exception for that of the United States. Through the study of the “Father of the Constitution,”[2] James Madison, it is most evident that this document he created was shaped around an ideology greatly influenced by classical political philosopher, John Locke. Madison incorporates Lockean philosophies of natural law and role of government with a democratized systematic approach, thus establishing a Constitution largely based upon the ideology of the Neoclassical Liberal Democratic Theory. The influence of this ideology is evident within three fundamental aspects of the American Constitution: the division of powers and federalism, the notion of checks and balances, and the process of the judicial review. Locke’s natural law supports the notion that individual freedom is an essential right, while his opinion of the role of government, in its most vital duty, is to serve, represent and protect the people. Madison, however, did not agree with Locke’s vision of human nature, denying his opinion in that humanity is generally good. Conversely, Madison did not trust the public, understanding human nature to be selfish, aggressive and unchangeable. Still, such as in Locke’s natural law, Madison believed that people had the right to some sort of self government and therefore aspired to create a government, “… guided by an enlightened and benevolent elected aristocracy, that would protect the interests of the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    How Did the Framers Guard Against Tyranny?
    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Did the Framers Guard Against Tyranny?

    Imagine oneself back at the constitutional convention in seventeen eighty-seven. All of the brightest minds and most respected people in one place, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the southeast of the state, near New York. Because it is May, and just beginning to be summer, it is hot, and because all the windows are closed in the interest of secrecy, it is stifling as well. Fifty-five well known thinkers of the age, all white males, have come. They range in age from James Madison, an up-and-comer and a prodigy who is twenty five to Benjamin Franklin, a wise, venerable, learned man who is eighty one. Delegates from eleven states are present, New Hampshire not turning up until July, and Rhode Island not at all, thinking to veto the proceedings by their absence. The problem that had caused these proceedings was that the Articles of Confederation, the current system of government was too weak. although the Northwest Ordinance resulted of it, and it fixed the fear of a strong central government and dominance by large states, there were unfair competition among states, unenforceable trade agreements, no power over states governments, no president, no judicial branch and the government could not pay debts because they could not force states to pay taxes. As the cons out-weighed the pros, it was clear that something had to be done. The framers decided to create a new government completely. The question was; How do we give the government the power it needs while preventing tyranny? This essay will address the many and varied was the constitution guards against tyranny. In this essay, the word tyranny refers to James Madison’s definition, which states, “The accumulation of all powers…in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, Hook Document). The constitution addresses tyranny in four main ways: the balance of powers between national and state…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analytical Analysis Of The Federalist Paper 'No. 10'
    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analytical Analysis Of The Federalist Paper 'No. 10'

    In the first Federalist paper, No. 10 written by James Madison, is an informative piece of writing warning us against the dangers of having such a strong, powerful government and what ways that we can break away from the “Violent Factions”. (Paragraph 1, Line 3.) As Madison goes on, he goes into great detail on the two ways of defeating the creation of factions. One would be to get rid of liberty and freedom all together, which is impossible to complete. The second way to get ride of the factions would be “by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.” (Paragraph 4, line 2.) Both of those methods are equally unwise as it is impossible to complete. As it is hardwired into…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Madison And Reinhold Niebuhr
    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similarities Between Madison And Reinhold Niebuhr

    American founding father, James Madison, and twentieth century theologian, Reinhold Niebuhr, write about government from two very different perspectives. Madison, a rationalist from the age of enlightenment, had an optimistic view of the possibilities of a democratic government that was formulated during the early days of a young nation. On the other hand, Niebuhr, writing more than a century and a half later, critiques a democratic government that has been in place for generations. Both agree that controlling self-interest is necessary in order to have a functioning, well-organized government and society.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Tribe And Dorf
    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Tribe And Dorf

    In this essay, Tribe and Dorf describe our nation’s Constitution as a document that continues to dynamically work to achieve a balance between governmental power and individual liberty. Founding fathers like Madison and Jefferson also look to the constitution as a distinct outline, instead of a blueprint. The amendments and bills that comprise it tend to be very vague and open to interpretation of what some definitions actually mean. This leads to a lot of disputes throughout history of what the Constitution and its words stand for.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison
    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Thomas Jefferson Protect Individual Rights
    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Did Thomas Jefferson Protect Individual Rights

    Thomas Jefferson, American Founding Father and the principal author of The Declaration of independence, theorized that “the care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government.” Jefferson pointed to “unalienable rights,” and these rights were “giving to us by our creator and not by a government.” To protect the fundamental and individuals rights accordingly, James Madison was involved by including the Bill of Rights to The Constitution. The intention with these, was to remove the power from government reach only. Years after the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution was put in place, a remarkable Landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court was news and continues to…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Summary
    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Federalist No. 10 Summary

    Federalist Paper No. 10 is considered one of the most important documents in American political history. The paper examines how the writers of the constitution defined government, specifically the part that would focus on protecting the minority and their rights from the more organized factions. These factions planned to pass legislation that would eventually cause harm to the liberty of the minority groups and the overall good of the country. Factions are inevitable, given the nature of man. People have different opinions, wealth status, and property, therefore resulting in the formation of factions (people with similarities fraternizing with the people who seem to be the most similar to them concerning their social circumstances).…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Edwards Contribute To The Enlightenment
    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Edwards Contribute To The Enlightenment

    Thomas Jefferson, a prime example of an original American politician, put many motions into action in regard to the creation of this new land. One of Jefferson’s greatest accomplishments is the drafting of the Declaration of Independence. This single document made way for the American Revolution to set sail and succeed. Within this piece of writing, Jefferson declared that “all men are created equal” (Jefferson 762). Though this statement, Jefferson put the image of equality and freedom in sight. He also writes of the American people as “a people who mean to be free” (Jefferson 343). These statements laid the foundation of the ideas behind the creation of this document and the reasoning behind its…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing classical republicanism and natural rights
    • 657 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparing classical republicanism and natural rights

    Our founders believed that there were good points in government from both theorists. They believed that by combining the idea of helping the society as a whole (classical republicanism) and protecting individual rights and working for people’s own self-interest (natural rights philosophy) , a new better idea of people who work for themselves that could benefit the common good overall is the best for America. Cicero’s quote “For our country did not beget and educate us gratuitously, or without the expectation of receiving our support. She does not afford us so many blessings for nothing, and supply us with a…

    • 657 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Framing the Constitution
    • 261 Words
    • 1 Page

    Framing the Constitution

    In Charles A. Beard’s article, “Framing the Constitution,” he suggested that there is a dichotomy between the values of the Constitution and those of the Declaration of Independence, who believed that the Constitution was a document that was only created to protect the framers’ wealth. He articulated that the reason rich framers wanted to protect against majority rule was to prevent the majority from overthrowing the rich. His purpose was to examine the circumstances and conflicting goals and ideals of the time, and how they were resolved and agreed upon in the Constitution. His analysis was very persuasive, as it effectively argued that importance of the circumstances at hand, as well as comprehensive, in that in articulates the issues and solutions of the time.…

    • 261 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Alexander Hamilton Federalist No. 1 Analysis
    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton Federalist No. 1 Analysis

    As the Revolutionary War reached its completion, the United States (U.S.) sought to form a permanent and strong nation. This prompted Alexander Hamilton to write the article, “Federalist No. 1” in supplication of the citizens of New York to ratify the Constitution. Hamilton believed that the Constitution would unite the United States under one central government and it was the duty of the American citizens to determine their form of government based off of the common good. He creates his argument by establishing the important choice U.S. citizens have, emphasizing that learning all information about both sides is crucial, and voicing his concern that one must not be swayed by their self-interests or cathartic ideals. It is through the creation…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

    On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    'The Federalist Essay Number 10' By James Madison
    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    'The Federalist Essay Number 10' By James Madison

    The Federalist essay number ten, was one of many essays written by James Madison. Madison wrote these essays in order to try and lessen factions in popular governments. “By some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community(Madison).” He claims that with a popular government, factions will be reduced but can never be fully abolished. A constitution can help build a republic, where most get a say in what happens.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Paine Self Regulation
    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Paine Self Regulation

    What constitutes a society is primarily based on the various mindsets and beliefs of its individuals. Whether the people choose to stand united as one in a land that promotes diversity, or remain isolated from one another due to contrasting beliefs, there is bound to be controversy in regards to the management of this situation. Thomas Paine, a revolutionary intellectual, shares his input as to what truly characterizes America as a whole within his book, the Rights of Man. Although some individuals contend that his content within the passage are not applicable to today’s standards, Paine’s statement remains true as it directly pertains to the simplicity of our government’s operation and the administration of its peoples.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The American Revolution: The Role Of Self Government
    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The American Revolution: The Role Of Self Government

    They believed that a large republic was vulnerable to divisions that would undermine national unity. Their reasoning was an extension to their desire for a homogenous community. While it is true that a nation works best when its populace is united in support of the common good, it is imperative to understand how “impracticable” and “unwise” it would be to eradicate factions. According to Madison, factions are an inevitable result of the liberty granted to citizens to express their views in public. The danger with such internal divisions is not so much their causes, but rather their effects.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics