Federalist No. 10 Summary

Federalist Paper No. 10 is considered one of the most important documents in American political history. The paper examines how the writers of the constitution defined government, specifically the part that would focus on protecting the minority and their rights from the more organized factions. These factions planned to pass legislation that would eventually cause harm to the liberty of the minority groups and the overall good of the country. Factions are inevitable, given the nature of man. People have different opinions, wealth status, and property, therefore resulting in the formation of factions (people with similarities fraternizing with the people who seem to be the most similar to them concerning their social circumstances). Some
They are referenced to as unions, trade and professional associations, civil rights activists all make the administration of laws and policy. The pluralists think that direct democracy does not exactly need to be desired, and that politics actually need expert attention. Pluralism is defined as the theory that there is not a dominant class or institution of people that have a dominant power. It focuses on groups (made naturally in any type of government), and shows easy group formation. During the 1950’s and 1960’s, the rise of different interest groups rose to power.They were all fighting for a different case. The success that came out of this was that there was a diversity of groups, therefore allowing for different strengths resulting in many resources and different tactics. Although diverse groups were coming into power and becoming mini-elitist, there was still competition between the fragmented government institution. The federal court was a huge access point, as were congressional legislations, presidential and federal agencies, and independent commissions. The result of this is the protection of minority rights. There are huge inequalities in both wealth and power amongst people, but in pluralism, one of the main focuses is to disperse this power, meaning that different groups have power on separate issues, resulting in a “polyarchy”, not a hierarchy. According to
This theory holds the important decisions to be made by a smaller class of people, therefore not including most of the public, resulting in a smaller amount of opinions and an easier outcome. There are three parts of a pyramid in the elite theory— the elite, the middle level, and the masses. According to the elite theory, the top of the pyramid (the elites) make most of the decisions, or at least have the most influence. The middle levels, which include congress, courts, and the states are in charge of how to implement these decisions. Most of the implementations were made after World War II, wither in the White House, Pentagon, or State Department. Only a few senators were chosen, given that the elite were the ones making most of the decisions. Instead, once the policy had been formulated at the top it was sold to the public the Civil Rights Movement, the elitists were the majority, not the minority groups. This meant that there were not many differing opinions, therefore making it harder to obtain the freedom and results that were needed for a good outcome. Involved in elitist theories is something called the iron triangle. The iron triangle is a policy making group between interest groups, bureaucracy, and congress. They are all interchangeable, meaning one thing leads to another, and