Preview

Pluralism Vs Marxism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
151 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pluralism Vs Marxism
The pluralist view the state as a mechanism that represents the interests of every member of the state. The pluralist theory goes a step further stating that no certain powers control the social contract as everyone has an equal state in it. The elitist on the other stress material power. Meaning that those who have the most resources should be more successful, have a higher mental capacity, and be rightful rulers, otherwise they wouldn't have gotten into their possession. Both elitist and pluralist agree that interest groups have the ability to participate in the U.S. political system. However, this is only their extent in similarity. Pluralism as Steven Luke's mentions could be portrayed by the one dimensional system in its view of power,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pluralism works in the way that groups and coalitions are constantly fighting for power within the government to fit their agendas and the people they are vying for. This can be seen with the bike rack debate that has been presented in Sierra Vista’s city council. The special interest group is offering an award of being a bike friendly city to Sierra Vista in hopes of making people healthier, however public opinion support of the bike racks has been dismal at best. This is a local example but the NRA is an example of a larger special interest group where a lot more wealth comes into play as in a biased pluralism only adding fuel to the ruling elite…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is much easier to contrast the four contemporary theories of American democracy than to compare them, as pluralist, hyperpluralist, elite and class, and traditional theory each highlights the competitive foundation of politics. Each contemporary theory investigates the underlying question "Who governs our nation" yielding significantly different conclusions. While the pluralist theory emphasizes that politics is merely a competition among groups - a competition overwhelmingly controlled by the wealthy according to elite and class theory - hyperpluralism contends that these groups weaken the political backbone rather than support it. Pluralism and hyperpluralism are similar in that both agree that groups indelibly impact society and therefore the government by pressing their concerns through organized efforts, however they differ as to whether the impact is positive or negative, respectively. Hyperpluralism also contrasts with elite and class theory stating that many groups - not just the elite ones - are so strong that the government is unable to act. It asserts that there are too many ways for groups to control policy, regardless of their organization, topic, or funding. Traditional democratic theory is composed of key principles that an ideal democratic process should consist of: voting must be representative, a population must participate, civic understanding, citizen control of agenda, and inclusion. The majority rule - in which the will of over half the voters is followed - guarantees equality, control, and inclusion, guaranteeing rights to those subject to the laws that follow the policy making process. A key aspect to the theory is equal representation from each citizen, which under hyperpluralist and elite and class theory is thought of as endangered or nullified by the power of groups and the wealthy, respectively. Pluralism suggests that democratic theory is successful because…

    • 364 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A pluralist government is much like the opposite of the elitist government. In a pluralist government the power of decision making and policy making are based more on the wants and needs of many rather than just a few. It is said to be a government of the people, by the people, for the people.Everyones views are valued regardless of ones position in society. This is similar to the type of government we have…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Summary

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages

    They are referenced to as unions, trade and professional associations, civil rights activists all make the administration of laws and policy. The pluralists think that direct democracy does not exactly need to be desired, and that politics actually need expert attention. Pluralism is defined as the theory that there is not a dominant class or institution of people that have a dominant power. It focuses on groups (made naturally in any type of government), and shows easy group formation. During the 1950’s and 1960’s, the rise of different interest groups rose to power.…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government 2305

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages

    -According to the pluralist theory of American democracy, politics is a contest among various. Interest groups…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exam 2 Notes

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A group of people with shared feelings or attitudes that try to influence government policy making. Pluralism leads to interest groups.…

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The belief that competition among all affected interests shaps public policy. ii. Pluralists believe that political tools such as money, prestige, expertise, and access to the mass media are too widely scattered fora single elite to monopolize on them. iii. Pluralists acknowledge that big businesses, cozy elites, or career bureaucrats may dominate on some issues, but not all. V. Is Democracy driven by Self-Interest?A. Some actions are independent of self interest, but others aren’t.i. Dependent on individual’s ideals, morals, and ethics. ii. A policy may be good or bad regardless of the motive behind it. B. The belief that people will usually act on the basis of their self-interest, narrowly defined, is a theory to be tested, not an assumption to be made.i. Some people act out of purely self interest while others do not. Most people lay somewhere in between. VI. What Explains Political Change?A. Many forces drive political changei. Economic interestsii. Powerful elitesiii. Entrenched bureaucratsiv. Competing pressure groupsv. Morally impassioned individuals vi. WarsB. Many historical things have happened in U.S history causing political changei. The Great Depressionii. The development of the federal government VII. The Nature of Politics A. The Importance of Power in Politicsi. Conjures up deals, bribes, power plays, and arm twisting. ii. Shared understanding, common friendships, communal or organizational loyalties can shape…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Marxism Anti Democratic

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to answer this question the parameters of the discussion must first be set, with key terms in the title defined. Marxism I define to be ‘an economic and socio-political worldview and method of socio-economic enquiry which focuses upon a materialist interpretation of history, a dialectical view of social change and an analysis and critique of capitalism. ‘ Democracy, I define to be an ‘egalitarian form of government in which sovereignty is vested in the people and exercised by them or elected agents.’ In the following essay I will present two opposing interpretations of Marxism, with both leading to wildly divergent conclusions regarding the democratic nature of Marxism. The first perspective revolves around a literal interpretation of Marxism; with the emphasis being entirely on Marx’s writings as oppose to any subsequent interpretations or manifestations of his beliefs. The second perspective involves an empirical study of Marxism, with various Marxist regimes analyzed and the extent to which they are democratic being the primary means of assessing as to whether Marxism is democratic or not. The following two quotations, I believe demonstrate the polarity of opinion existing on Marxism and Democracy and accurately summarize the two perspectives I will be arguing; Hal Draper (1978) states ‘Marx’s socialism maybe most quickly defined, as the complete democratization of society, not merely of political forms,’ and Joseph Femia ‘Communist despotism was a logical consequence of Marxist theory.’ In the first part of the essay, I will outline Marx’s theory of the state and democracy which supports the argument that Marxism is not theoretically anti-democratic. In the second part of the essay I will present the view that as a result of their being such significant empirical evidence in opposition to this thesis I believe it is hard to argue that Marxism can be viewed as democratic. Marx stated ‘The question whether human…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roles Of Interest Groups

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Interest groups are a key aspect of American politics in the world today. An interest group is an organization of people with shared policy goals that enter the policy making process at several points to try and influence the policy. The development of interest groups has led to the creation of three theories used to describe them: pluralism, hyperpluralism, and elitism. Pluralism states that interest groups bring representation to all the people. Elitism is when there is an unbalance of power towards certain interest groups. Hyperpluralism states that the government is differential to interests groups and creates conflicting regulations. Hyperpluralists believe that iron triangles greatly influence the policy. Iron triangles are known…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hyperpluralism

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. From the perspective of pluralism government makes decisions benefitting relatively small groups and not the general public.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. Pluralist Theory - An analysis of politics emphasizing the role of diverse and competing interest groups in preventing too much power being accumulated in the hands of political and economic elites.…

    • 5943 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The World State is a seemingly perfect place. There people are “decanted” and then conditioned to fit perfectly into a preselected social caste. Because of the conditioning they are put through, everyone is happy in the caste they are put in. The feelings of despair and suffering are absent from this world, at the price of religion, art, and open scientific discoveries. While from the surface the World State seems like an utopia in the novel Brave New World, Aldous Huxley expresses his clear distaste for the state through the character John as he criticizes the ways of the World State’s society once he’s introduced to the different aspects of it, Bernard Marx as he criticizes the World State as he doesn’t fit in in it, and Helmholtz as he struggles…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism Vs Functionalism

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay will be mainly focused on the similarities and the differences in two sociological perspectives which are the Marxist and the Functionalist approach when it comes to health and illness, also will define the definition of them.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pluralism and Syncretism

    • 1717 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the mid to late 1800’s, millions of Catholic immigrants began arriving in the United States. In 1815 there were only 80 Catholic Churches, 7 priests, and 70,000 Catholics, making Catholicism an extreme minority. However, by 1916 Catholics were a powerful force with 15.7 million members. The six largest Catholic immigration groups, referred to as the “Big Six” included Irish, German, Italian, Polish, French-Canadian, and Mexican Immigrants. Each immigrant group brought with them their own set of ideas on what it means to be a Catholic, and how best to practice Catholicism. For example, Irish Catholics held priests in high regard and paid a lot of respect and attention to them, whereas the Italian immigrants were very anti-clerical and didn’t respect or trust priests at all. Since the Irish were the first and most dominant group to arrive in America, most of the parishes that were established when other groups began to immigrate were Irish Catholic. Many of the other ethnic groups didn’t prefer or necessarily agree with the practices of the Irish Catholic church, so the church as a whole had to come up with a way that all of the different immigrant groups could be happy and be able to practice however they felt most comfortable doing. The church came up with two systems- the first was the territorial parish system. Under this system, a parish was placed in each distinct territory and if you lived in that territory, you must attend that territorial parish. This system failed because the different groups weren’t able to practice freely and they were forced to attend church with other ethnic groups that they didn’t necessarily agree with. This system was also dominated by Irish priests and services, and had very little diversity. So, a second system was invented where parishes were oriented around a particular ethnic group with a priest that that group chose, as long as that priest was approved by the bishop. So long as each group could raise the funds to build…

    • 1717 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict/Marxist Theory –Vold distinguishes between Marxist and Conflict perspectives, and lumps "post-modern" perspectives in with Conflict. Explain the differences between these two "critical" views of crime, particularly on the issue of social power (be sure to include Sellin, Vold, Quinney, Black, Chambliss & Seidman). How does one go about "testing" conflict theory? What, according to Vold et. al are the limitations of Conflict Theory? Finally, Post-Modern theory suggests that "domination" lies at the root of both violence and punishment. Explain this.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays