Preview

Pluralist Vs Elitist Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
312 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pluralist Vs Elitist Government
Elitist vs Pluralist

In an elitist government it is believed that only a select few of people should hold political power. People who are maybe from a higher class or wealthier than the others form the group of elites. Elitist point of views are taking much more serious and carefully than those who are outsiders to this group.

A pluralist government is much like the opposite of the elitist government. In a pluralist government the power of decision making and policy making are based more on the wants and needs of many rather than just a few. It is said to be a government of the people, by the people, for the people.Everyones views are valued regardless of ones position in society. This is similar to the type of government we have

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pluralism works in the way that groups and coalitions are constantly fighting for power within the government to fit their agendas and the people they are vying for. This can be seen with the bike rack debate that has been presented in Sierra Vista’s city council. The special interest group is offering an award of being a bike friendly city to Sierra Vista in hopes of making people healthier, however public opinion support of the bike racks has been dismal at best. This is a local example but the NRA is an example of a larger special interest group where a lot more wealth comes into play as in a biased pluralism only adding fuel to the ruling elite…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Gove Study Guide

    • 20135 Words
    • 81 Pages

    Elite – identifiable group of persons who possess a disproportionate share of some valued resource- in this case political power…

    • 20135 Words
    • 81 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The pluralist view is that power is spread equally throughout society. Pluralist base their argument that no one group holds more power than the other based on observations within liberal democracies. Pluralist contend that political equality and individualism is protected by the political rights to vote and the freedom of speech, the weakness of an individual within a society is often times compensated by the ability to organize groups, the overall state of the pluralist society holds neutrality, and the pluralist state is characterized by the plurality of the elites. The elitist view suggests that policy choice and change is dominated by certain social classes. Elitist believe that the primary role of the state is to ensure control of these…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Which form of government was most effective during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries? Absolutism or Democracy?…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the Constitution of the United States was written in 1787 it was required that nine of the thirteen states would need to ratify it before it became valid. As the debate over the Constitution continued, two opposing sides materialized: the Federalists and the AntiFederalists.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canada Interest Groups

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Another factor making the political party inferior is its longstanding values, territorial basis restricting it from expansion since political parties aim to accomplish control of legislative. Hence since the legislature is based on a territorial perimeter, the rest of the political party body must follow in this direction. In contrast to some interest groups, political parties have not fully been able to achieve a system which incorporates the public into the policy making process. Pross questioned whether the fragmentation of the political parties endangers long-standing institutions, or if this merely is the politics of the new age. Canada has witnessed the emergence of a new public philosophy “pluralism” started taking the place of the previous representative parliamentary democracy. Pluralism emphasizes the collaboration between government and interest groups. Ideally members of private groups exchange ideas and negotiate with government civil…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appendix E: Part One

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Throughout most of U.S. history in most locations, what race has been the majority? What is the common ancestral background of most members of this group? The majority race in U.S. history was the Caucasians. The most common ancestral background of the Caucasian group is European. There were many other ancestral backgrounds but European was the most common in the United States at the point in time.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Vs Federalism

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Federalists favored a balanced relationship with the federal and state government. For example, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were in favor of a strong central government. They saw that the states had too much power and thought that under the new constitution , the new national government needed to be stronger. On the other hand, the Anti-federalists favored a weaker national government with power belonging to the states. For example, Patrick Henry favored this idea that the state has most of the power.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Larger Racial Minorities

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    |Pluralism |Is defined as a condition where different groups culturally, ethnically, or religiously are present|…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some arguments that are in favor of our Pluralist type of government is that a good government would encourage this. Interest groups mobilize and educate the public. It is felt that a lot of interest will prevent one interest from making the other interest go away. The basic assumption is that all the competing interests will regulate one another, producing balance (pg. 435). An interest group may lose one issue and then win the next, and most of society will have been represented by the government. It is also felt that if interest groups compete to be represented by elected officials, all groups will benefit; a group representing a minority will beat an apathetic majority on important issues to the minority (pg.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. Pluralist Theory - An analysis of politics emphasizing the role of diverse and competing interest groups in preventing too much power being accumulated in the hands of political and economic elites.…

    • 5943 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Vs Federalism

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Whether or not this nation is a republic or a democracy is an age old question that has been asked since the nation had its revolution and separation from England. In Federalist Paper No. 39, Madison points out that many nations before us have been incorrectly called Republics, including England, from whom we parted. A republic form of government is what Americans fought for in the Revolution and the definition and characteristics of this form of government are made clear by Madison.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oligarchy: A country that is controlled by a small group of people. The definition of democracy has been forgotten when it comes to the election process. Some people even sum up the election process as a way of oligarchy government would do it. This isn't the way our government worked before and it shouldn't work like that ever. We have been bought up from our forefathers as a country where everyone's voices should be heard but apparently it isn't how we imagined it to be today.…

    • 2203 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unity V. Pluralism

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Language represents both unity and pluralism because the writers are united due to the fact that they are all writers but they are different in the sense that they all write about different things in different ways. In Amy Tan's “Mother Tongue”, Tan uses in the way that peoples language helps shape the way of life for many people as wells as their developmental stages. In the story, Tan's mother speaks “broken” Chinese, so it's her responsibility to translate her language into proper English. Tan knew that her mother had “broken” Chinese because Tan heard the way her peers were speaking either English or Chinese. In contrast to that, Tan's way of showing pluralism was by the ways of how the parents “broken” English could effect their childrens possibilities and the fact that people from other countries and the same as Tan could speak either “perfect” or “broken” English as well as their native language. Their possibilities could be in danger because they are growing up with the way of just “broken” English not learning “perfect” English would could set them back in school and have them not achieve their dreams. If some one from a different country is able to speak “perfect” English after a couple of months of being in America could just mean that they pick things up fast or that they are more willing or wanting to learn more than those who settle for the “broken” English. Another author that shows these two characteristics of writing is Richard Rodriguez, “Private Language, Public Language”. Rodriguez uses unity to to describe people in society. He is saying that if you have clear, firm English than you should be part of the society, but if you don't than you must not belong. Also, that children should have the opportunity to have a Bilingual Education; meaning that no-English-speaking kids, use their family language as the language of school, so that they don't lose that important piece of the culture. Writers have many different ways of show language…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: To analyse the compatibility of democracy with elitism it is first important to define both the terms democracy and elitism. Democracy is in its simplest form is the rule for the people by politicians etc, and elitism is most simply known as ‘a class that rules and a class that is ruled’. This therefore opens up the question, do those in higher positions effectively rule those lower down, democracy within elitism, and the effects if elitism was not around. ‘a minority which monopolises the effective exercise of power’. P69, schwarzmantel.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays