Preview

Assess The Difference Between Elitist And Pluralist State

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
298 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess The Difference Between Elitist And Pluralist State
The pluralist view is that power is spread equally throughout society. Pluralist base their argument that no one group holds more power than the other based on observations within liberal democracies. Pluralist contend that political equality and individualism is protected by the political rights to vote and the freedom of speech, the weakness of an individual within a society is often times compensated by the ability to organize groups, the overall state of the pluralist society holds neutrality, and the pluralist state is characterized by the plurality of the elites.
The elitist view suggests that policy choice and change is dominated by certain social classes. Elitist believe that the primary role of the state is to ensure control of these

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pluralism works in the way that groups and coalitions are constantly fighting for power within the government to fit their agendas and the people they are vying for. This can be seen with the bike rack debate that has been presented in Sierra Vista’s city council. The special interest group is offering an award of being a bike friendly city to Sierra Vista in hopes of making people healthier, however public opinion support of the bike racks has been dismal at best. This is a local example but the NRA is an example of a larger special interest group where a lot more wealth comes into play as in a biased pluralism only adding fuel to the ruling elite…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    |Pluralism |is used, often in different ways, across a wide range of topics to denote a diversity of views, and|…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is much easier to contrast the four contemporary theories of American democracy than to compare them, as pluralist, hyperpluralist, elite and class, and traditional theory each highlights the competitive foundation of politics. Each contemporary theory investigates the underlying question "Who governs our nation" yielding significantly different conclusions. While the pluralist theory emphasizes that politics is merely a competition among groups - a competition overwhelmingly controlled by the wealthy according to elite and class theory - hyperpluralism contends that these groups weaken the political backbone rather than support it. Pluralism and hyperpluralism are similar in that both agree that groups indelibly impact society and therefore the government by pressing their concerns through organized efforts, however they differ as to whether the impact is positive or negative, respectively. Hyperpluralism also contrasts with elite and class theory stating that many groups - not just the elite ones - are so strong that the government is unable to act. It asserts that there are too many ways for groups to control policy, regardless of their organization, topic, or funding. Traditional democratic theory is composed of key principles that an ideal democratic process should consist of: voting must be representative, a population must participate, civic understanding, citizen control of agenda, and inclusion. The majority rule - in which the will of over half the voters is followed - guarantees equality, control, and inclusion, guaranteeing rights to those subject to the laws that follow the policy making process. A key aspect to the theory is equal representation from each citizen, which under hyperpluralist and elite and class theory is thought of as endangered or nullified by the power of groups and the wealthy, respectively. Pluralism suggests that democratic theory is successful because…

    • 364 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A pluralist government is much like the opposite of the elitist government. In a pluralist government the power of decision making and policy making are based more on the wants and needs of many rather than just a few. It is said to be a government of the people, by the people, for the people.Everyones views are valued regardless of ones position in society. This is similar to the type of government we have…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Summary

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages

    They are referenced to as unions, trade and professional associations, civil rights activists all make the administration of laws and policy. The pluralists think that direct democracy does not exactly need to be desired, and that politics actually need expert attention. Pluralism is defined as the theory that there is not a dominant class or institution of people that have a dominant power. It focuses on groups (made naturally in any type of government), and shows easy group formation. During the 1950’s and 1960’s, the rise of different interest groups rose to power.…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pluralists believe that pressure groups overcome the democratic deficit that builds up as most people’s political participation is to cast a vote every five years, this leading to people having little or no influence over decisions made between elections, and minority views not being represented. Pressure groups increase participation and access to the political system, thereby enhancing the quality of democracy. They complement and supplement electoral democracy in two main ways: first, by providing an important mechanism by which citizens can influence government between elections; and second by enabling opinions to be weighed as well as counted.Pressure groups improve the quality of government. Consultation with affected groups is the rational way to…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the contrary, it is often political advisors and spokespersons who influence the thought processes and subsequent decisions made by the elected official. Therefore, the power elitist theory describes the U.S. as a country that is governed by a small group of interconnected persons who occupy key positions in government. Conversely, in “Who Governs?” and “A Preface to Democratic Theory,” Robert Dahl rebuts the arguments presented by the power elitist theory. In a study based on this theory, Dahl argues that whereas there was an unequal distribution of power in New Haven, authority and influence was shared among different groups that were competing against each other. In addition, he coined the term polyarchy in reference to American politics as well as other systems that are characterized as open and inclusive.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 10, 11, and 6 Notes

    • 4053 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Pluralism: idea that citizens should be informed and should participate in democratic decision making to ensure the health and vitality of the system…

    • 4053 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government 2305

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages

    -According to the pluralist theory of American democracy, politics is a contest among various. Interest groups…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The belief that competition among all affected interests shaps public policy. ii. Pluralists believe that political tools such as money, prestige, expertise, and access to the mass media are too widely scattered fora single elite to monopolize on them. iii. Pluralists acknowledge that big businesses, cozy elites, or career bureaucrats may dominate on some issues, but not all. V. Is Democracy driven by Self-Interest?A. Some actions are independent of self interest, but others aren’t.i. Dependent on individual’s ideals, morals, and ethics. ii. A policy may be good or bad regardless of the motive behind it. B. The belief that people will usually act on the basis of their self-interest, narrowly defined, is a theory to be tested, not an assumption to be made.i. Some people act out of purely self interest while others do not. Most people lay somewhere in between. VI. What Explains Political Change?A. Many forces drive political changei. Economic interestsii. Powerful elitesiii. Entrenched bureaucratsiv. Competing pressure groupsv. Morally impassioned individuals vi. WarsB. Many historical things have happened in U.S history causing political changei. The Great Depressionii. The development of the federal government VII. The Nature of Politics A. The Importance of Power in Politicsi. Conjures up deals, bribes, power plays, and arm twisting. ii. Shared understanding, common friendships, communal or organizational loyalties can shape…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The three contemporary theories of American democracy are the pluralist theory, elite and class theory and hyperpluralism. The pluralist theory is a theory of government and politics emphasizing that politics is mainly a competition among groups, each one pressing for its own preferred policies. Pluralist theory describes a society ruled by the opinions of many views which inevitably results in conflicting views. This conflict tends to cancel out any gains made by one side, resulting in a kind of natural equilibrium. An example of pluralist is the inability of the House and the Senate to swiftly come to actions because of Democratic/Republican conflict. The elite and class theory is a theory of government and politics contending that societies are divided along class lines and that an upper-class elite will rule, regardless of the formal niceties of governmental organization. Over a third of the nation's wealth is currently held by just one percent of the American Population. Elite and Class theorists believe that this one percent of Americans controls most policy decisions because they can afford to finance election campaigns and control key institution, such as large corporations. They tend to live in the Northeast and attend exclusive prep schools and Ivy League universities. They tend to belong to mainline Protestant churches and they marry one another. Often members of the elite do not occupy governmental positions themselves, but depend on elected and appointed officials who do their work for them. Hyperplurism is a theory of government and politics contending that groups are so strong that government is weakened. There are several different groups, such as religions, cultural groups, ethnicities or interest groups that the government can't control due to hyperplurism. It is an extreme form of pluralism. An example would have to be the stance on abortion or gay marriage, pertaining to the state's constitution. Some states are passing laws either allowing gay…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. Pluralist Theory - An analysis of politics emphasizing the role of diverse and competing interest groups in preventing too much power being accumulated in the hands of political and economic elites.…

    • 5943 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: To analyse the compatibility of democracy with elitism it is first important to define both the terms democracy and elitism. Democracy is in its simplest form is the rule for the people by politicians etc, and elitism is most simply known as ‘a class that rules and a class that is ruled’. This therefore opens up the question, do those in higher positions effectively rule those lower down, democracy within elitism, and the effects if elitism was not around. ‘a minority which monopolises the effective exercise of power’. P69, schwarzmantel.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It needs to meet in the middle, in which there is flexibility within the ideals, as well as rigidity, too much of either is seen as dogmatic as well as out-of-date. This stance will not win over the majority of people. So, minority groups attempt to be more open-minded as well as assertive, in order to be taken seriously by the majority. With regards to majority influence, it was discovered that majority groups are quite the opposite in terms of flexibility. They tend to be less creative, as well as having a more narrow minded approach, in comparison to minorities (Nemeth, 1986).…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Political Ideology Political Ideology • Pluralism can arise when two or more groups in a country differ in    • Two extreme forms of political ideology are:  Democracy; and  Totalitarianism Language (Belgium) Ethnic background (South Africa)…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays