Preview

Pluralism Vs Pluralistic Democracy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
166 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pluralism Vs Pluralistic Democracy
On the other hand, pluralistic democracy doesn’t rely on what the majority of the people want. Pluralistic democracy is best understood through the generalization that power is relatively distributed among interest groups in society, which compete with one another to control public policy. Some groups tend to dominate in one or two issue areas, while other groups and interests tend to dominate in other issue areas. There tends to be little overlap between those leaders who participate more in certain policy application areas than others and what linkage there is. This tends to come from popularly elected political officials such as party leaders who, by the nature of their jobs, must exercise leadership in a number of different policy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pluralism works in the way that groups and coalitions are constantly fighting for power within the government to fit their agendas and the people they are vying for. This can be seen with the bike rack debate that has been presented in Sierra Vista’s city council. The special interest group is offering an award of being a bike friendly city to Sierra Vista in hopes of making people healthier, however public opinion support of the bike racks has been dismal at best. This is a local example but the NRA is an example of a larger special interest group where a lot more wealth comes into play as in a biased pluralism only adding fuel to the ruling elite…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is much easier to contrast the four contemporary theories of American democracy than to compare them, as pluralist, hyperpluralist, elite and class, and traditional theory each highlights the competitive foundation of politics. Each contemporary theory investigates the underlying question "Who governs our nation" yielding significantly different conclusions. While the pluralist theory emphasizes that politics is merely a competition among groups - a competition overwhelmingly controlled by the wealthy according to elite and class theory - hyperpluralism contends that these groups weaken the political backbone rather than support it. Pluralism and hyperpluralism are similar in that both agree that groups indelibly impact society and therefore the government by pressing their concerns through organized efforts, however they differ as to whether the impact is positive or negative, respectively. Hyperpluralism also contrasts with elite and class theory stating that many groups - not just the elite ones - are so strong that the government is unable to act. It asserts that there are too many ways for groups to control policy, regardless of their organization, topic, or funding. Traditional democratic theory is composed of key principles that an ideal democratic process should consist of: voting must be representative, a population must participate, civic understanding, citizen control of agenda, and inclusion. The majority rule - in which the will of over half the voters is followed - guarantees equality, control, and inclusion, guaranteeing rights to those subject to the laws that follow the policy making process. A key aspect to the theory is equal representation from each citizen, which under hyperpluralist and elite and class theory is thought of as endangered or nullified by the power of groups and the wealthy, respectively. Pluralism suggests that democratic theory is successful because…

    • 364 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A pluralist government is much like the opposite of the elitist government. In a pluralist government the power of decision making and policy making are based more on the wants and needs of many rather than just a few. It is said to be a government of the people, by the people, for the people.Everyones views are valued regardless of ones position in society. This is similar to the type of government we have…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Summary

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages

    They are referenced to as unions, trade and professional associations, civil rights activists all make the administration of laws and policy. The pluralists think that direct democracy does not exactly need to be desired, and that politics actually need expert attention. Pluralism is defined as the theory that there is not a dominant class or institution of people that have a dominant power. It focuses on groups (made naturally in any type of government), and shows easy group formation. During the 1950’s and 1960’s, the rise of different interest groups rose to power.…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pluralist democracy works with numerous organised groups who all have some political power in the decision-making setting. It assumes that it’s ‘neutral’ government who listens to, and acts on the outcomes of these competing interests. Thus the large number and operation of pressure groups is considered to be a vital element in the promotion of pluralist democracy.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The pluralist view is that power is spread equally throughout society. Pluralist base their argument that no one group holds more power than the other based on observations within liberal democracies. Pluralist contend that political equality and individualism is protected by the political rights to vote and the freedom of speech, the weakness of an individual within a society is often times compensated by the ability to organize groups, the overall state of the pluralist society holds neutrality, and the pluralist state is characterized by the plurality of the elites. The elitist view suggests that policy choice and change is dominated by certain social classes. Elitist believe that the primary role of the state is to ensure control of these…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 10, 11, and 6 Notes

    • 4053 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Pluralism: idea that citizens should be informed and should participate in democratic decision making to ensure the health and vitality of the system…

    • 4053 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A.)The 15th amendment gave all American citizens, no matter their race or wealth, the right to vote while the 19th amendment gave women the right to vote after hundreds of years of being cut off from society and their natural…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Problems and Promise in Pluralism,” Annalee R. Ward argues for academic freedom amongst communication scholars, and questions the separation of faith and life (1). Ward seeks to determine whether various denominations can have an “engagement of differences in creative ways” that allow for coexistence in scholarship (Eck 9). Does tolerance, hold the key to coexistence amongst various denominations? The author questions whether faith serves as a universal guideline for scholars’ lives and communication practices (2). Can a scholar maintain personal integrity and still taste the fruit of pluralism? Ward realizes the answers to these questions will face obstacles and roadblocks along the way. The first obstacle centers on the fact that most…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The belief that competition among all affected interests shaps public policy. ii. Pluralists believe that political tools such as money, prestige, expertise, and access to the mass media are too widely scattered fora single elite to monopolize on them. iii. Pluralists acknowledge that big businesses, cozy elites, or career bureaucrats may dominate on some issues, but not all. V. Is Democracy driven by Self-Interest?A. Some actions are independent of self interest, but others aren’t.i. Dependent on individual’s ideals, morals, and ethics. ii. A policy may be good or bad regardless of the motive behind it. B. The belief that people will usually act on the basis of their self-interest, narrowly defined, is a theory to be tested, not an assumption to be made.i. Some people act out of purely self interest while others do not. Most people lay somewhere in between. VI. What Explains Political Change?A. Many forces drive political changei. Economic interestsii. Powerful elitesiii. Entrenched bureaucratsiv. Competing pressure groupsv. Morally impassioned individuals vi. WarsB. Many historical things have happened in U.S history causing political changei. The Great Depressionii. The development of the federal government VII. The Nature of Politics A. The Importance of Power in Politicsi. Conjures up deals, bribes, power plays, and arm twisting. ii. Shared understanding, common friendships, communal or organizational loyalties can shape…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democracy, also known as democratic government, is essentially a government by the people. It is a form of government in which the supreme power is retained by the people, but sometimes exercised indirectly through a system of representation and delegated authority periodically renewed during elections.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There will be a small number of participants in that majority, and it would be much easier for them to work together to accomplish their ideas. In a large republic, there will be a greater variety of interests, which will make it much harder to find a majority. If a majority is found, it would still be hard for them for meet with each other and work to complete their goals, because of the massive number of people and the fact that they are spread out over a large amount of…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some arguments that are in favor of our Pluralist type of government is that a good government would encourage this. Interest groups mobilize and educate the public. It is felt that a lot of interest will prevent one interest from making the other interest go away. The basic assumption is that all the competing interests will regulate one another, producing balance (pg. 435). An interest group may lose one issue and then win the next, and most of society will have been represented by the government. It is also felt that if interest groups compete to be represented by elected officials, all groups will benefit; a group representing a minority will beat an apathetic majority on important issues to the minority (pg.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Republic Vs Democracy

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Significantly, the U.S Constitution established a new legal system in the United States with new fundamental laws and a national government in order for the country to remain stable. The document guaranteed certain basic rights for Americans as it was signed by delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in September 17, 1787. In particular, the Founding Fathers wanted a Republic U.S. government instead of a democracy for the federal and state governments. The seven figures chose this because they believe in preserving a stable government that protects the rights and liberties of all citizens. To point out, keeping a republic secure the rights to individuals and the government is constitutionally or legally limited. The Founding Father believed in a republic because even if sovereign power is held by the people, there is still a limit to that capability.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority is those individuals with power that control and are in charge of the government. The minority, put their vote towards those who they want to be ruled by and step back to follow without checking that what the government is doing is just and correct. According to Thoreau, when power is in the hands of the people, a majority is permitted to rule because they are physically the strongest (2). Society gives, or lets, the power be handled by the majority not because it is fair to them, or right, but just because they are stronger. The power is found in a few individuals because they are considered stronger in the eyes of the minority. These few individuals become the majority and govern over the actual majority, the people which are greater in number. The majority, being legislators, congressmen and those with power in the government, use the power they have to impose what is in their benefits over the minority. The minority, being all the people in the country, the tax payers, the average working class man and even those in lower classes should step up to make sure that the majority does what is in the best interests of the…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays