Preview

Argumentative Essay: Do People Have Rights For Themselves?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
736 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay: Do People Have Rights For Themselves?
How can a person live without having rights for themselves? We started off fighting for the rights we have today back in the slavery. I think to myself how the United States would be if the people didn’t fight for rights. The most important rights in my eyes are freedom of speech, right to bear arms, a person shall be held under a fair trial of peers. Freedom of speech is very important because I feel like people should be able to say whatever is on their mind and not be ridiculed. For example a teacher at Kenwood academy was suspended for speaking his mind on the internet via YouTube. He was speaking on religious things which should have not been a problem. He is now fired from his job and probably will have a problem finding another. Freedom of speech is a very …show more content…
Right here in Illinois there is a case about the right to bear arms. State law barred "anybody of men, other than the organized militia of the state and the troops of the United States, from associating as a military company and drilling with arms in any city or town of the state. They stated in the Presser V. Illinois “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." I think that some people shouldn’t have the right to bear arms. Because if they are not in the right state of mind you could pop off on anybody. Why not try and stop the people from getting guns illegally. I would never actually think that some people would get the right to carry and then actually kill people without somebody threatening them. People that are actually getting this bear to carry right are felons and they were convicted for having a weapon and using it for bad reasons. As a country we can’t let this law be passed because just like somethings we pass they won’t have rules for the person but a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Over the last several years there has been an ongoing debate on how to interpret the Second Amendment and whether or not we should have gun control. With the Second Amendment specifically grants that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The controversy of it being that in the Second Amendment doesn't specify who "the people" are. This being said it leaves room for the legislative bodies and court to pass laws and interpretations that influence the way this Amendment is applied and enforced.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is quite clear that by looking at criminals intentions and the overall protection of our country's people gun control should not be administered. Since the establishment of our great nation guns have played a central role and have been of great importance. Though some may think that guns are weapons of war, crime, and violence our Founding Fathers realized they were an essential right that needed to be preserved for the citizens. In the Bill of Rights the Second Amendment of the Constitution reads "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Gun control proponents have…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The right to bear arms is the the Second Amendment in the United States constitution. What says a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The right to bear arms has been around this country long then it's been a country. Putting more restrictions on guns just goes against what our founding fathers intend the nation to be like and infringes against the right to bear arms.The second amendment supports my claim which is anti-gun control laws and how putting restrictions on gun makes it…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution is supposedly the law of the land, right? Well America will soon find out how true that statement actually stands. “The right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed,” is part of the second amendment developed by the forefathers of this country (constitutioncenter.org). In the recent debates about gun control, the government is talking about taking away the rights that amendment gives citizens. This has recently become an issue because of all of the public shootings and crimes around the U.S. While something should be done to stop violent crimes and shootings, guns are not the issue and people refuse to understand is that it’s the person behind the gun that pulls the trigger not the gun itself.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens of the United States have different views on gun control. Some citizens demand it because they think that all the violence will stop. Others think they will be safe if they are armed. Both stances are some what correct and they are both similar. If criminals that people are armed they might not try to rob or mug the citizens or committee crimes. But it also not good to have everyone armed. That's why it should be States rights so the people choose not the Government. This is popular sovereignty, it's government for the people by the people also their individual rights.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Voters

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I think for the safety of others I think that it is necessary for a person who wants to have a permit for a fire arm should go through some requirements and training. A firearm should not be given just to anyone. I agree that busy public places should do background checks on guns for the safety of everyone. One of the most important places to have background checks would be at schools, especially since all this shooting have been happening at schools. I agreed with the second article when it said that felons and mentally ill people should not have the possession of a firearm. In my point of view, I disagree when it said that possession of a fire arm for the safety of your life and the life of your family at your own home is necessary. We should be able to protect ourselves in case of an intrusion or a robbery or some kind of assault against a person who is putting our lives in danger. Of course that I agree that in order of having a firearm a person should have special training before getting one not only for their own safety but for the safety of others. What I think is that if it is necessary for a person with a permit of a firearm should carry a concealed gun. So far I really haven’t seen anything done by the government that keeps this from happening. All I see in the news is more and more people dying because of firearms but nothing important is being done about…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, it is clearly stated in the second amendment that people are allowed to freely have guns on them. However, I believe that it is right for us to have gun control laws. Guns are good for protection and hunting for resources but it goes bad at the point that people do not know how to properly handle a gun and do not use them responsibly. These last few years we have especially seen an increase of heart-breaking tragic gun related events that could have been avoided if these certain people had not been allowed to have a weapon. Everyone should be eligible to obtain a weapon but should then have to go through certain tests to show that they are capable enough to own a…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Essay Example

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is a major debate going on in the U.S. on gun control. Should people have the right to carry a concealed weapon or should they only be allowed to have a gun in their home? Another question is if the government were to ban guns would that be doing us law-abiding citizens more harm then good? Or maybe they should only allow guns in the hands of people that have had background checks and our licensed to handle them. [C]itizens in Missouri, North Carolina, and Texas are asking their state legislatures for the ability to defend themselves against violent criminal attack regardless of where the attack takes place”(Swasey 175).…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Gun Control

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States has a law called The Bill of Rights, and in these rights one of them states the following; “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” They label it as the Right to Bear Arms. The American dream means different things to different people. To many people, freedom is possession and owing a gun of any kind. Gun Control is strict enough with the requirements for even getting a gun. Society benefits from firearms in the hands of responsible citizens. Attempts to keep firearms away from these citizens do more harm than good; gun control needs to be less strict and more basic.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The person who holds the gun is who harms the other person. If the government is trying to prevent any more casualties than there absolutely has to be, just by banning guns they are not going to succeed. What the government should do is when someone tries to apply to get a concealed weapon permit or just a license to own a weapon the should have to go through a series of tests to test their mental status in case the doctors have not diagnosed them with any mental illness that might be apparent. These mental status test should happen to an existent of being tested about every two years or so to renew their license. The people of the U.S should be allowed to have weapons as self-defense but the people should use a proper gun safety and use a gun cabinet to store their guns in and keep it out of the reach of children. I also think that the Second Amendment was put into place for a reason, we the people of the United States are letting our government have too much power and that can be very consequential we are already starting to feel the negative effects of letting this happen. If we let the government have as much power as they have and even more we are going to lose our rights because once the…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans have a natural right with the Second amendment. Nelson Lund, a Professor at George Mason University School of Law, once stated how, “The right to self-defense and to the means of defending oneself is a basic natural right that grows out of the right to life and many gun control laws interfere with the ability of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves against violent criminals” (Gun Control - ProCon). People have a right to safety, and a right to defend themselves. Many citizens acknowledge and defend this right. By implements stricter gun laws the only thing being done is taking away some people's ability to defend themselves against others who won't follow any laws put into place. This walks hand in hand with the second amendment, which “protects an individual’s right to own guns” and states that guns are needed for self-defense from threats ranging from local criminals to foreign invaders. Along with the fact that gun ownership deters crime rather than causes more crime (Second Amendment). America was built upon freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and even the freedom to own guns and protect oneself from whomever may pose a threat. Bad people with guns can only be fought against by good people with the same abilities to have guns. Along with this the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the fundamental right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense (Second Amendment). The second amendment is not the only amendment that protects a humans right to bear arms, here are other amendments this country was built upon that protect an american's right to protect…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Gun Culture

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states that, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (U.S. Const. Am. 2). This amendment guarantees American citizens the right to have firearms. Since this amendment is very indistinct, it has remained a matter of debate and discussion in the United States. Many people are asking whether every citizen should have the right to possess a gun? There are many advocates of gun control people who wish to have strict laws to prevent certain groups of people from buying a gun. And there’s also those who disagree with gun control laws, and feel there should be a more tolerant gun control to…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Chicago's ban on the sale and transfer of guns was declared unconstitutional by a federal judge, saying that while the government has a duty to protect its citizens, it's also obligated to protect constitutional rights, including the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense”(Herbert G. McCann). During my primary research I found through a questionnaire that most of my classmates did not know whether the right to bear arms was a civil right or not and that's not only here according to Youth Speak Out “I read that although gun controls differ from state to state, the courts have permitted the government to limit some rights of gun manufacturers, owners and sellers. I guess it’s confusing because we don’t know whether the right to use and buy guns belongs to individuals or only to a militia”(Harley Machi). If a man had a weapon and was arrested does he have the right to that weapon? "if the sawed off shotgun had been a militia weapon, then, on this reading, the defendants would have had a constitutional right to possess it”(Michael C. Dorf…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This country is gifted with so many rights. Most of the people take these rights for granted and don’t know it. If some rights were repealed, trying to make things equal would be a struggle. To me the first amendment is the most important, and what makes this country what is is today.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anyone who wants to defend their self and wants a gun should be able to have a gun because when they're right to bear arms is taken away people start to lose their sense of safety.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays