Arguments Against Charles Darwin's Theory Of Evolution

Evolution is a theory created by Charles Darwin, it is part scientific theory and part unconfirmed hypothesis. Darwin’s theory of evolution can be broken down into two parts: the theory of microevolution and the theory of macroevolution. “Microevolution is the theory that natural selection can, overtime, take and organism and transform it into a more specialized species of that organism.” Macroevolution is the hypothesis that processes similar to those at work in microevolution can, over eons of time, transform an organism into a completely different kind of organism.” (Wile and Durnell 268). I am against the theory of Evolution. Three scientific sets that go against the theory of evolution are the fossil records, intermediate links, and molecular biology. Fossil records tell us a great deal about why evolution is not true. The study of fossil records is called paleontology. “If macroevolution did occur, paleontologists should be able to find series of fossils that demonstrate how one species slowly evolved into another.” (Wile and Durnell 273). If it did occur we should find intermediate links, but we have not found any fossils that represent intermediate links. Evolutionists claim that Archaeopteryx and
An intermediate link is a link between one species and another. If Macroevolution did happen, there should be more definitive fossils of intermediate links found all over. There should also be a great deal more of fossils that are in between two creatures not just a few that could possibly be interpreted as intermediate links. Also if macroevolution is correct then it should have still been occuring today. After all the theory of Macroevolution comes from Charles Darwin who believed in the ideas of Lyell and Malthus. Lyell believed in Uniformitarianism which we would still be seeing effects of this in many things