Arguments Against Genetically Modified Foods

When it comes to the topic of GMOs, many Americans assume that they are bad and detrimental to our health. I’ve always believed that to be true as well until I began researching the subject more thoroughly. The opinion genetically modified foods are strictly bad can be observed in our society with the movement to mainly eat organic produce and steroid free meat products from animals who were fed non-GMO feed. This way of shopping and consciously choosing alternative organic options is an ideal concept for many Americans who are concerned about the health of themselves and their families. There is great debate that has been brewing for the last decade about genetically modified foods and if they deserve to share a place and function in our world.
The greed of big businesses profiting off genetically modified seeds are eliminating the need for small farmers, some who desire to cultivate organically. For every argument against GMOs there is also a counterargument to defend the need for genetically modified organisms. On the other hand, genetically modified crops can help feed undernourished, impoverished countries that need nourishment, these GMO crops also prove to be more resilient and require less pesticides which is beneficial for the environment. Through GM technology the taste and health properties of food are also improved. I agree that GMOs are not perfect and there is room for improvement, especially where the political and business advocates are concerned. Overall though, the benefits for genetically modified food outweighs the negatives when it comes to GM technology and with time, the flaws surrounding them could be fixed to assist the world we live in to become a better version of