Preview

Arguments For Atheism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
792 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments For Atheism
Atheism is the belief that no God can exist. Atheism comes from the Greek word ‘Atheos’ which means ‘Godless’. Atheists can be split into two different categories ‘Strong Atheists’ and ‘Weak Atheists’. ‘Weak Atheists’ simply believe that no God does or can possibly exist, nothing more, nothing less. ‘Strong Atheists’ also believe that no God does or can possibly exist but they go as far as using logic and evidence to prove a God can exist. This essay will explore the arguments for Atheism.
One of the fundamental arguments for Atheists is there is no strong evidence of a God’s existence there is also no logical explanation for the existence of a God. Atheists use science and theory as the main way of studying the world around us and how the
…show more content…
Occam’s razor is a philosophical idea, which was recognised in the 14th century by a man named William of Occam. Occam’s razor is simply: “Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily.” Which simply means the simplest answer is the best answer. Atheists can use this as an argument for Atheism since the whole universe can be explained by scientific cosmology and the theory of evolution, why must we create the idea of another being called God?
An argument used quite frequently by religious believers is the “First Cause Argument.” This is the idea that everything that happens has a cause. The universe must have had a cause and that cause must have been God. Atheists can easily respond with: “What was the cause of God?” and a religious beliver could respond with:”God is perfect, God didn’t need a cause.” Well if that is the case then why did God create the universe? What benefits does he get from creating the universe? The “First cause Argument” is flawed and can easily be
…show more content…
The definition of omnipotence is to have unlimited authority or power. As God is said to be omnipotent this means he/she falls under the omnipotence paradox. The omnipotence paradox is a family of paradoxes that contradict the overall definition of omnipotence. If a God is omnipotent then they should be able to create a task that they are unable to do which contradicts the definition of omnipotence. Some of the paradoxes include: Can God create a stone so heavy that even himself cannot lift? If God has the ability to live an eternal life, he cannot have the ability to kill himself.
It is also said that God is Omniscient, which just like Omnipotence make him/her fall under the Omniscient paradox. The definition of Omniscience is to know all things. If God was to know everything, then he/she can’t forget and if he/she can’t forget then he/she doesn’t know what it’s like to remember

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Another argument that provides evidence for the existence of God is the Anthropic Principle. This idea states that the cosmos (i.e. the universe) was created for the sole purpose of creating and supporting intelligent life. F.R. Tennant proposed the idea, he summarised his opinion of the universe into one key quotation “as we look out into the universe and identify the many…

    • 984 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting off, the atheistic view of the beginning of the universe occurring by chance is irrational and irreverent in many ways. The thought of the universe just existing from no cause, let alone not a personal cause is just illogical. This universe has a contingency for God and the Kalam cosmological argument proves this. The Kalam cosmological argument is a well-organized argument for God that has been developed from Muslim philosophers al-Kindi and al-Ghazali, and has been reinvented by philosopher William Lane Craig. The Kalam argument is very simple and straightforward. It is dealt with as a series of dilemmas. Those dilemmas starts with since the universe exists, is there a beginning or no beginning, is that beginning caused or uncaused, and is that cause personal or impersonal. The first premise states that whatever begins to exist as a cause. This premise if very logical and denying it is only possible to have things come from a cause is counterintuitive. The second premise of the Kalam cosmological argument states that universe began…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The weaknesses of the Ontological Argument give support to Atheism. Discuss this claim (12 marks)…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Christianity succeeds where atheism fails, atheism is ultimately death an exercise in futility. God’s existence enables us to live happy lives with a hope for things yet to come . These arguments, defenses, and theodicies all serve as ways for a person to understand in part, none by themselves offer indisputable proof of God’s existence. They do however make the existence of a necessary being, a first cause, probable. Building on this this first cause, the God of theism, becomes more evident, this finally gives the suggestion of the God of Christianity, the God of the Bible. This God who reveals Himself in the Bible, as one who created, sustains, loves, and died for His creation. The problem of evidence evaporates for the one who accepts this God, the true God. He reveals Himself to those who seek Him in faith, ones who truly believe. Craig rightly quotes Francis Schaeffer “If God is dead, then man is dead too.” The atheist must live the noble lie to find any meaning to life, this often fails…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    It goes without question, that human beings will always question the existence of “God”. Whether these questions are formed in support or denial of an omnipresent creator they are important in helping shape our morality. H J McCloskey and his article “On Being and Atheist” is very critical of theists. It thus presents several arguments on how believers are incorrect in their belief in “God”, cosmological and teleological. McCloskey also focus’s on the existence of evil and how one can find comfort in atheism when facing evil.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Examine some of the key principles of the argument for the existence of God based upon religious experiences…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The anthropic principle proposes that the reason and purpose for the universe is the support of human life: ‘As we look out into the Universe and identify the many accidents…the Universe must in some case have know we were coming’ (Freeman Dyson, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle). It also demonstrates that the design argument need not reject the principles of evolution in order to assume a designing God. However, theistic supporters of evolution argue that scientific principles alone are not enough to explain a perfectly balanced natural order that…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In February of 1968, H. J. McCloskey’s published an article called, “On Being an Atheist.” In this, he argues that atheism is a more comfortable, logical and realistic than theism. He mentions the evil that is in the world and how it doesn’t make any sense to find comfort in a God that purposely causes pain, disease and natural disasters. McCloskey also mentions it is unreasonable to live by faith in this world. In this article, he argues the three theistic proofs including, the argument for design, the teleological argument and the cosmological argument.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Response Paper

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1968, a article was published by a man named H.J. McCloskey called “On Being an Atheist”, in which an attempt to present arguments against the existence of God is made. In his work, McCloskey attempts to provide readers with the argument that atheism is more “reasonable and comfortable (McCloskey,1968)” compared to the alternative theistic view. In his article, McCloskey attempts to make arguments against the three typical theistic proofs of God which includes the cosmological and teleological arguments, along with the argument from design. McCloskey uses the existence of evil and the irrationalness off faith against the theistic view of God. At the beginning of the article it seems that an intriguing argument will be made regarding the theistic view point of God, yet as McCloskey continues the argument becomes more biased in attacking spiritual beliefs which questions his validity.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God is one of the most famous of all philosophical arguments that address the existence of a supernatural being who created the material universe. The supernatural being whom created the material universe is the logical core of what is commonly meant by the word God within the classic theistic religious traditions of Judaism, Islam, and Christianity with reasoning that constitutes a philosophical argument for the existence of God. Many cosmological questions on religion have intrigued human beings across all cultures since the beginning of recorded history and continue to interest us today. The Cosmological Argument is also known as the First Cause Proof that addresses that something must require a first cause to be brought into existence. Although many philosophers and people are skeptics of this theory based on the unbelief of God existence and logically thinking that God would need a cause to existence. The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God is not the strongest argument for religious groups to prove reason for the existence of God.…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This was propounded by St Thomas Aquinas, and the ideas to this argument are found in his book Summa Theologica. He takes the universe as his starting point, because he knows for definite, that exists. However, he also says the universe is the end of his chain. Aquinas describes this chain as a ‘domino effect’ because once a causer causes something to happen; this then causes something else to happen, and so on. The causer here is God, and he is the Uncaused Cause, because God has always existed. Aquinas argued that the universe was created by a series of causes and effects, hence why he uses it as his end point in his theory. If you traced all of these causes back to the creation of the Universe, you would result in God; the First Motion (Unmoved Mover), First Cause (Uncaused Cause) and the First Being…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Response Paper

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages

    H. J. McCloskey, a renowned philosopher in the mid 20th century, wrote a provocative article in 1968 titled, “On Being an Atheist”. McCloskey argues for atheism as the preferred and better belief system based upon his refutation of the theistic arguments. He argues against the existence of God by attempting to refute the cosmological and teleological arguments; as well he endeavours to discredit a God based upon the presence of evil. In doing this, he extends the boundaries for arguing God, whilst opening the floor to debate free will and the apparent comfort of the atheistic belief system. However, through careful analysis of the arguments for God, and an insight into the mysterious free will that God has given man; we see that a theistic belief is logically more sound and preferred.…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the argument for the existence of God based on religious experience. (18) 2. ‘The argument merely indicates the probability of God and this is of little value to a religious believer.’ Discuss. (12)…

    • 2406 Words
    • 69 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Supporters of this argument emphasize its logical depth and its ability to provide a robust defense for the existence of God. This argument also fits well with the idea of a perfect God, because it says that God is the ultimate source of all causes and effects in the universe. Some people have raised objections to this argument, like the idea that there needs to be a good reason for everything, or that we can't go from things that exist to saying that God must exist. However, defenders of the argument have responded to these objections and shown that the argument is still valid and makes sense. In conclusion, both the ontological argument and the argument from causality give us important ideas about existence and God, and they contribute to a deep philosophical discussion about whether God exists.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays