Preview

Aristotle, Immanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
508 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle, Immanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill
Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill all discuss their philosophical systems, each striving to uncover the standard that guides morality. In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle outlines his system, beginning with the Chief Good towards which everything aims. The Chief Good is happiness, and is achieved through a life well lived. A life well lived results from performing our characteristic activity well, and humans’ characteristic activity is reason. Thus Aristotle uses reason to differentiate the higher from the lower life. Mill in his work titled Utilitarianism describes the standard of morality to be based on happiness; this standard Mill calls the Principle of Utility and it determines actions as right in accordance with the degree of …show more content…
According to Aristotle, the human soul is partly non-rational, which contains within it the appetitive part. The appetitive refers to the aspect of human nature that desires and seeks pleasure; from this part of the soul results the lower, pleasure-driven life. While humans share the appetitive with animals, Aristotle describes the uniquely human rational part of the soul. In Aristotle’s system, rationality is the characteristic activity of humans, which through performance leads to happiness. As Aristotle states, “…the virtue of a human being too will be the state that makes a human being good and makes him perform his characteristic activity well” (Aristotle, 29). Thus the notable characteristic of humans is their ability to reason. Aristotle goes further to distinguish the lower, pleasure-driven life from the higher life based on reason. In his words, “For we praise the reason of the self-controlled and of the incontinent, that is, the part of their soul with reason, because it urges them in the right direction, towards what is best…” (Aristotle 21). According to Aristotle, the rational life is higher because rationality enables humans to act contrary to desire and forego pleasure; it is through rationality that humans can live a higher life by overcoming the urges of the appetitive part of their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The most important part of the Mill’s utilitarianism chapter is the Greatest Happiness Principle. The Greatest Happiness Principle means the rule of human conduct. This…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke, Baron de Montesquieu, Voltaire, and Jean Jacques Rousseau were all enlightenment philosophers. Each of these men had a particular view of government, society, and its citizens and they were all passionate about their works. Locke (1632- 1704) was an English philosopher, his ideas had a great impact on the development of political philosophy and he is widely regarded as one of the most influential enlightenment thinkers. Montesquieu (1689- 1755) believed that all things were made up of laws that never changed. His most famous work, The Spirit of Laws, outlined his ideas on how government would work best. Voltaire (1694- 1778) was a poet, an essayist, playwright, historian, and above all, a critic of society. He was a great crusader for liberty and was twice imprisoned for his writings. Rousseau (1712-1778) generally recycled older enlightenment ideas but is well known for his passionate rhetoric, which enflamed a generation and beyond.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all, for Aristotle, humans are intended to be rational. Similarly for Epictetus “what it is to be a human being, is to be a rational mortal creature” (Graver, 2015). The term “rational” means to think things through over and over before deciding to do an action. Aristotle uses this term to explain that “the good is one whose actions as a rule are solidly based on excellent reasoning and who spends a great amount of time thinking” (SOMETHING).…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good And Evil Casablanca

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many different viewpoints on what is right and wrong and ethically and morally correct. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) and Jon Stuart Mill (1806-1873), both considered to be two of the best philosophers of all time, had different views on how one should live the Good Life. John Stuart Mill’s theory was called Utilitarianism and Kant’s theory, the Categorical Imperative.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant is recognized as the greatest philosopher since Plato and Aristotle (Wolff). He is most widely known for his work in the fields of metaphysics and epistemology (McCormick). Kant published many works regarding his epistemological views, but his most famous work is The Critique of Pure Reason (McCormick). He noted that Descartes had “simply accepted consciousness as an…inexplicable fact” (Wolff). Kant utilized this observation to refute Descartes’ famous quote, “I think, therefore I am,” with a slightly revised premise— “I am conscious” (Wolff).…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas More, Niccolo Machiavelli, and John Calvin are three theorists who share and justify their views on the relationship between the state and religion. More, the Catholic, Machiavelli, a critic of the Catholic Church, and Calvin, the Protestant, all believe that religion is a very important element of the state. However, More and Calvin also believe that religion can constrain rulers as well as support them, which ultimately leads to their conclusion that the arbitrary use of power by the state should have a limit. In the book Utopia, Thomas More describes what he believes an ideal society’s characteristics are by creating a fictional state, a Utopia. He builds the new world on paper. One of the more significant points in More’s piece is that religion is a…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An excerpt from Exploring Ethics, best exemplifies the comparison from Mill and Kant. Kant's ethical system concentrates exclusively on the reason for an action and does not take into account its results, Mill's system focuses only on consequences. Mill's explained "that this is the singularity is the basis in which you use to judge morality, with those being morally right being those that will manufacture the most happiness because in the end all humans seek happiness above everything else." He also argued that fame, money, and virtue could not replace happiness but could be used to obtain it. Mill’s believed that happiness is the guiding arch that drives…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Age of Enlightenment spanned from the Middle 18th century and on to the French Revolution. It is defined as the time when thinkers emerged believing in shedding the light of science and reason on the world in order to question traditional ideas and ways of society’s norms and established hierarchies. Many philosophers presented many theories and beliefs to form questions in the minds of people. These questions entertained elites and aristocrats to pass by the time. Eventually these thinking games evolved into more serious ideas emerged and began challenging those in power. Enlightenment thinkers created many concepts to question the status of the royals and gaining the fear of the upper class, afraid that it would lead to social chaos, and ultimately result…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Mills

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill suggests that a person's ethical decision-making process should be based solely upon the amount of happiness that the person can receive. Although Mill fully justifies himself, his approach lacks certain criteria for which happiness can be considered. Happiness should be judged, not only by pleasure, but by pain as well. This paper will examine Mill's position on happiness, and the reasoning behind it. Showing where there are agreements and where there are disagreements will critique the theory of Utilitarianism. By showing the problems that the theory have will reveal what should make up ethical decision-making. John Stuart Mill supports and explains his reasoning in his book, Utilitarianism. Mill illustrates the guidelines of his theory. Mill defines utilitarianism as the quest for happiness. His main point is that one should guide his or her judgements by what will give pleasure. Mill believes that a person should always seek to gain pleasure and reject pain. Utilitarianism also states that the actions of a person should be based upon the "greatest happiness principle". This principle states that ethical actions command the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Mill further explores the need for pleasure by noting "a being of higher faculties requires more to make him happy." . He acknowledges that some pleasures are more alluring than others are. He adds to this by making known that when placing value in things to calculate pleasure, not only quantity important but quality as well. Mill's criteria for happiness is easily understood, some statements that he gives are questionable. John Stuart Mill plainly laid out what he believes that the basis for ethical decision-making. First, the pursuit of pleasure is directly related to happiness. This idea can be easily accepted. It is natural for a person to focus his goals on things that will bring him pleasure. It would be absurd if someone's goal in life was to be poor and…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With this general happiness for everyone’s well-being, a persons priority or rights can’t take a lead or be more important over the general happiness of everybody (chapter II, p.17). This agrees with Aristotle’s, that the political functioning in a society through virtuous character are to benefit the community. Mill argues against Aristotle by claiming that because having security is the definitive right that is deserved by all people through law, certain actions, such as torture, are just in order to ensure that a person has security (Chapter 5, p.54). With this being said Utilitarianism follows a concept that is focused on the general happiness of everyone in the community, but also the happiness that comes to them through security. Mill states that there are certain qualities that show justice and injustice, and some of these qualities are that it is unjust for a person to be deprived of their legal and moral rights, but it is just that everybody should get what they deserve. According to this, torture of a person, can be justified because it will overall give people assurance of security and happiness. But, it is also unjust because it violates a person’s moral and legal rights. This is where the General Happiness Principle comes into play. The Greatest Happiness Principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness and wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness, which is pain (Chapter 2, p. 7). Happiness is the absence of pain or freedom of pain, which is the only thing that should be desirable as an end and people will always choose the end that is overall more desirable in pleasure (Chapter 2, p. 8). Mill clearly states, “…laws and social arrangements should place the happiness or the interest of…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle believes that there is only one goal, one ultimate end for every individual—that is eudaimonia, translated as happiness, not as a feeling but happiness as the highest human good or a life full of activity. He claims that a person should live a way of life distinct from the lives of animals, where they only live for the sake of living or pleasure.1 As human beings, people should use their power of speech to communicate and make rational decisions within a polity, striving to live their lives up to their full potential and to their full capacity for a happy life.2 The life of politics, the via activa, is thus the key to the chief good or the best life for humans; however, the life of action must be of certain type of quality, in accordance with reason, since different actions may lead to the good or the bad life. In other words, a person’s actions must be in line with arête, with virtue or excellence.3…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant and Emerson

    • 2207 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The readings of Immanuel Kant’s “Observations of Enjoyment” and Ralph Emerson’s pieces titled “Art “ and “ Circles” displayed a kind of similarity between the two very different writers. Throughout my essay you will see just how they are similar and what one would possible think of the others ideas. You see no ideas are necessarily right or wrong ultimately like in life people do not always agree…

    • 2207 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the enlightenment period there were many philosophers and thinkers. The philosophers were from all of Europe. They all had many ways of believing how a country should be ran and how people should have their own rights. I will be telling you about many philosophers including Thomas Hobbs, Baron de Montesquieu, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Adam Smith and more.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Mill

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This view forms the basis of the contrasting argument between him and Kant .Mill principle of `utility also known as the greatest happiness is that, when people act out of duty it justifies the utilitarian principle as a foundation of morals.It explains that actions are right in proportions and promote overall human happiness of everything or anything that can ;possibly tolerate pain.it focus on the consequence of actions.Not on rights or ethical sentiments.it is best to be cultivated and noble…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays