Aristotle's Contradictions Of An Active Citizen

speak are able to participate in their political community. In the political community, each citizen has a say or right to decide what is best for their society. Since they have the power and ability to alter their political sphere, they are an asset in liberating their fellow community members who do not have the entitled privilege to participate in a deliberative or judicial office. Aristotle's notion of freedom revolves around an active citizen because they are not necessarily capable of using their logic and reasoning to create a discussion in order to vote or make a heavy decision. Some possible changes include either upholding their constitution or changing it to benefit the community. Nevertheless, there are some contradictions with the active citizens because the active citizen does not have to be a good citizen.
Aristotle outlines the criteria between the good citizen and the active citizen. Even though the
He argues that slavery is natural and beneficial to both the masters as well as the slaves because they are instruments to one another (Aristotle 2). The superior would rule over the inferior just as the soul rules over the body. The masters hold the power while the slaves do not; nevertheless, they are needed in order to sustain the master's power and welfare. Slaves are necessary because they secure the livelihood of their masters as well as provide leisure for them (Aristotle 6-7). In addition, this relationship would also benefit the slaves as well because the slaves would be able to share the virtue of the master and elevate themselves (Aristotle 7). This is where the concept of being ruled and ruling comes into play. They both are assets to each other because they reciprocate certain benefits. Although, the slaves are a social necessity to their masters, they also contributed to their political rule (Aristotle