Preview

Articles Of Confederation And Tyranny Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
732 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Articles Of Confederation And Tyranny Essay
Why does our country run the way it does? Obviously, because of the Revolutionary War. We did not want any kind of ruler that had all the power, all at once. So, why is that? What did the found fathers of our country come up with in the 1700’s to protect the colonies from tyranny? After the war, none of us wanted to go back to the kind of monarchy that England had. But, the government we had established-- known as the Articles of Confederation -- had no central government at all. So, the delegates had to figure out how to guard the country against tyranny, while also forming a stable, working government. The founding fathers established a non-tyrannical government by setting up a separation of powers, establishing checks and balances, and splitting up the power held by big and little states.

The delegates were able to set up a separation of powers by realizing that, if all powers were run by a sole people/person, it would become corrupt. As James Madison said in the Federalist
…show more content…
As said in the constitution; article 1, section 2 The House of Representatives. “Representatives shall be apportioned according to [population]. The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one representative..” This may not seem very beneficial to the prevention of tyranny, but it’s fair, right? If the big states had gotten all that they wanted, we would have had tyranny; and vice versa. The point is also continued in article 1, section 3 Senate. “The senate of the United States shall be composed of two senators from each state, chosen by the legislatures… each senator shall have one vote.” In this excerpt, it negates the population of any state entirely. Every senator is equal in the sense that no one’s vote is more powerful than another because of their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    People elects a person to the house of representatives and supreme court, so person wouldn’t have too much power : dangerous for the U.S. They divided the gov’t powers into three independent parts to prevent tranny. In Document C there aim was to divide and arrange the several offices into the three branches, so they won’t be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other. Tranny was prevented by giving each branch powers to block the other branches. I’m showing that without the three branches in the constitution the branches would make any rule they want without having someone telling them…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the system is organized and equal for all states. There is no favoring the big states over the small states. This created equal power among the states, no matter how big the population…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. "From 1781 to 1787 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." Using the documents and your knowledge of the period, evaluate this statement.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is understood that the US Constitution was written to form a more centralized form of government, a federation, which could protect and regulate the rights of the US citizens. While the Articles of Confederation was avoiding this type of government affected by the British experience, the constitution encouraged it. The main difference between these two documents is the balance and centralization of powers. How did the constitution change the role of national government in the life of US citizens?…

    • 1180 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The last guard against tyranny was the Big States versus the Little States which means that each state will have certain amounts of senator’s ( The bigger the state, the more senators). Articles in the Constitution state that a certain amount of representatives will be chosen for the amount of a states population.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    powers. The idea that power needed a limit came from the Magna Carta 1215/ if all the…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Population)…” But, on the other hand small states would have a disadvantage of representation in the House like, Rhode Island. Big state v. small state guarded against tyranny because we came up with a compromise of two senators for each state. Through the compromise no one state gains more control and has more power than the…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then, the constitution created the “separation of powers” to guard against tyranny. The “Separation of Powers” was the government separated into three branches so that they can spread out the power so that one branch of government can have more pull in what happen in the decisions made for the well-being of the country. For example, the legislative branch is the senate and House of Representatives, the executive branch consists of the President, and the judicial branch belongs to the Supreme Court. (Document B) Separation of powers protects against tyranny. One way that the documents show the way that the constitution uses the separation of powers to guard against tyranny is when it has the…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In May, 1787, 55 men from 11 states gathered in Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention. The object of the meeting was to frame a government that was strong enough to hold the states and people together, but also could guard against tyranny. At the time, the Articles of Confederation was in use, but it wasn’t working. So the framers were stuck with a big question. How could the new constitution guard against tyranny? Now, we know that the constitution guards against tyranny because it has federalism, checks and balances, separation of powers, and how representation is set up.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a perfect world, this would lead to effective representation for each state. Normally a bicameral congress issues an abundant say to both houses in deciding laws. Furthermore, the founders vied for this in efforts to smother and hinder any sort of dictatorships on U.S. soil.” Larger states wanted representation purely by population. Smaller states did not appreciate that method, because they felt it lessened their say. They would have minimal say in national government, and fewer representatives. A compromise was eventually agreed on every state would have two representatives in the Senate and have representatives based on population (the house).…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But the question remains, “How did the Constitution prevent too much power from getting into the hands of one person or group?” The Constitution was defended from tyranny through a variety of different ways while being made at the Constitutional Convention by using federalism, having a separation of powers in government, having a system of checks and balances, and having a…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was the United States in a crisis under the Articles of Confederation, or was the “crisis” exaggerated by the Federalists to justify their movement?…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government was set up under the Articles of Confederation, America’s first constitution. The founders were so afraid of a strong central government that they gave all power to the states, rather than set up an over-seeing national government. The Revolution was fought to get away from an overbearing and unfair ruler, so it is understandable why they wouldn’t want another monarchy to take over. The problem was that the Articles of Confederation gave little to no power at all to their national government, causing distress and non-compliance between the states. The Articles of Confederation denied the government the ability to take care of the states and the union. An influential philosopher at the time, Hobbes, believes that it is the sole purpose of the national government to enforce peace and laws; thus making life, liberty, and the pursuit of property possible. Another influential philosopher at the time, Locke, also believes that a central government is necessary to promote public good, to protect property and promote…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison was also concerned that certain rights were needed to protect the minority from the self-interests of the majority. Madison contended that this Constitution would remedy this by enforcing the Electoral College instead of the popular vote. The Electoral College gave some weighted influence on the smaller…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After many long and hard years of constant fighting, turmoil, and endless bloodshed, the thirteen colonies finally separated itself from England. The country of America now had a new problem at hand, setting up an effective government that would be much better than the oppressive rule of the British. The first step, of course, is setting up a constitution. The Articles of Confederation, ratified in 1781, was the first constitution of America. The Articles of Confederation was strong in that it gave the central government the powers to conduct foreign affairs, regulate western lands, and set up departments. This constitution was weak in that the central government was unable to impose taxes, control international trade, or enforce laws, and it was difficult to pass any law. Even though the Articles of Confederation had its strengths and weaknesses, its weaknesses outweighed its strengths rendering the document useless in governing the new country.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays