Preview

Arundel Partners: The Sequel Project

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2725 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arundel Partners: The Sequel Project
Table of Contents Introduction 2 Question 1 2 Part 1 2 Part 2 3 Question 2 3 Method 1 – Using an Option Pricing Model 3 Method 2 – Using the Projected Financial Performances 5 Comparison 6 Question 3 7 Advantages 7 1. Time Value 7 2. Capture Value of Options 7 Disadvantages 7 1. Assumptions Made 7 2. Tax Effect 7 3. Historical Data 8 4. Selection Bias 8 Further Assistance/Data Required 8 Question 4 9 Problems/Disagreement 9 Contractual Terms and Provisions 9 Appendix A – Per Film Value Using Financial Projections 11

Introduction
In 1992, Paul Kagan Associates, Inc. came out with a new business idea. The idea was to create an investment group, Arundel Partners, to purchase the sequel rights associated with films produced by one or more major U.S. movie studios. As owner the rights, Arundel would wait to see if a movie was successful, and then decide whether or not to produce a second film based on the story or characters of the first.
One of the unique features of the new idea was that Arundel would purchase sequel rights before the first films were even made and released. Another feature was that the investor group would not make artistic judgements or attempt to select the rights for particular movies based on predictions of a possible sequel’s success. Lastly, Arundel’s advance cash payments for the rights, at an agreed-upon price per film, would help finance production of the initial films.
Whether Arundel could expect to make money depended heavily on how much it had to pay to purchase a portfolio of sequel rights. Hence, to ensure that the new business idea would be profitable, the company appointed Mr. David A. Davis, a movie industry analyst to value the sequel rights using the proprietary data on industry cash flows that the company has gathered.
Question 1
Part 1
Arundel Partners will be interested in buying movie sequel rights as it enables them to defer the investment without losing the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Though increasing the movie company's advertising budget could potentially lead to higher sales, there are many leaps of logic made by the author that make a large return on investment a premature conclusion.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arundel Partners

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Arundel plans to agree on the number of films and price per film before either the studio or itself knows which films would be produced. This prevents the studio from increasing the price of the sequel right if it predicts that a particular movie will be a hit. Thus, Arundel is aiming to earn handsome profits from movies that eventually turn out to be a hit, since it would have paid a relatively low price for the call option on the movie. This is an important point as Arundel’s profitability heavily relies on how much it has to pay for the sequel rights. Although most of the movies will not have profitable sequels (hence rendering the option’s payoff as zero), the few hit movies will bring about a huge payoff such that overall, Arundel predicts to profit from this idea.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We assume that the past data reflects the future probabilities of sequel production and success of movies.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arundel Partners

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If the first movie was a success they would exercise their right and make the sequel or sell it to the highest bidder. Otherwise they would just write it off their investment schedule. The chances of making a profitable business would largely depend on a good estimate of the rights present value at the contract date. To less would not tempt the studios (inquiries indicated not less than USD 2 million per movie) and too much would not make the business profitable.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Arundel Partners' believe that they can make money on this project as it allows them to capitalize on the idiosyncratic risk of the motion picture business. Producing and distributing motion picture films is a risky business due to the uncertainty of moviegoers' tastes and a studio never knows if they have a blockbuster on their hands until after the movie has started production or even later after it has been released. The financial resources of even the largest studios often become strained. Arundel's value proposition, to purchase the rights to movie sequels in a sequence of payments during the producing of the first movie, is to provide funds to the movie studios when they most need it. Arundel benefits from this arrangement as the greatest risk is taken by the movie studios when they produce the original film. Almost all sequels follow successful films and in the last 10-20 years it has become common for successful films to spawn one or more sequels. Arundel will be able to determine the success of the first movie before they decide if they would like to make the sequel so there is a limited down side as they can always choose not to produce a sequel if the first movie performance is poor. In addition, Arundel also has the option to sell the sequel…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some movie sequels could be delayed until 2009 and be pushed into production too soon to get them to the public faster. The quality of the movie could suffer.(www.nytimes.com)…

    • 2314 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A group of investors (Arundel group) is looking into the idea of purchasing the sequel rights associated with films produced by one or more major movie studios. Movie rights are to be purchased prior to films being made. Arundel wants to come up with a decision to either purchase all the sequel rights for a studio's entire production during a specified period of time or purchase a specified number of major films. Arundel's profitability is dependent upon the price it pays for a portfolio of sequel rights. Our analysis of Arundel's proposal includes a net present value calculation of each movie production company. In order to decide whether Arundel can make money buying movie sequel rights depends on whether the net present value of the production company's movies is higher than the estimated 2M per film required to purchase the rights.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since movies are an expensive business that requires up front capital, Arundel’s offer of providing cash pre-production will be attractive to movie studios, giving Arundel an advantage in contract negotiation. Depending on how well they negotiate their contracts, the amount of successful returns needed to see a return on investment will vary.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are only three studios that Arundel would make a profit out of their sequel right which are Sony Pictures Entertainment, Warner Brothers and The Walt Disney Company as you can see in table 2. There are only six films that Arundel would make a profit if he exercises their options as you can see in table 1. I suggest that Arundel starts the negation of the sequel right in value between $1-$2 million and don’t exceed the maximum the call option price for the individual studio since they need. Moreover, I suggest the studio have rights for subsequent sequels in order to keep the studio committed to the success of possible sequels.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) List 3 ancillary products will you create for this movie, give the pricing and target market.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After a serious consideration, Knox decided to produce Frazier’s movie with $50 million budget agreement. John Connor, one of Knox’s trusted vice presidents, act as the studio’s liaison with Frazier and to be executive producer on the film. Connor was a veteran of many years experienced in working with directors and budgets.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    b. Next, is figuring out the budget, knowing their budget determines how the film will be produced.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tangerine: Movie Analysis

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Obviously, those movies are in a different genre however, you can still tell where the money was spent on; amazing the audience with innovative…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Universal Pictures, or Universal Studios, has been around for a little over a century and it is currently regarded amongst the top six movie studios in America. It grosses billions of dollars in revenue annually and produces major hits and movie stars. Universal is also owned by a giant media conglomerate known as NBC Universal, which is quite different from its humble beginnings. This paper will provide a brief insight into the relationship between Universal Pictures and its impact on the movie industry along with how Universal became a big name in Hollywood.…

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study

    • 611 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cook and Kenneth Anderson who joined cook’s firm. Cook’s firm invested another $ 1.7 million in to the development of programs in that way Cook and his company made another investment in to the video rental business because the players are not so much dominant in this business.…

    • 611 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays