Preview

Assess The Difference Between Utilitarianism And Non Consequentialism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
327 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assess The Difference Between Utilitarianism And Non Consequentialism
Consequentialism pertains as to if or not the end result brought on by way of moves is morally big, or whether it is effortlessly the morality of the actions themselves that's major. A consequentialist view is referred to as utilitarianism, and a non-consequentialist view can be known as deontology. In line with utilitarianism, an action’s morality depends upon its final result or consequences. This policy holds that morally appropriate actions are those that provide essentially the most benefit to essentially the most men and women. When the hindrance of deforestation is examined via the eyes of a utilitarian, we are obligated to avoid deforestation considering the fact that this may benefit the most important quantity of individuals. Deforestation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A consequentialist theory which one decides an ethical decision should maximize benefits to society and minimize harms.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Consequentialists believe that whether an act is right or wrong depends only on the overall consequence of that act, where punishment should serve to promote good, contributing to crime prevention or societal welfare.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article, “Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism”, Louis P. Pojman explained the grounds on which utilitarianism has been attacked and showed some possible response to its defenders which imply his positive attitude towards utilitarianism [1] . In order to argue that thesis, Pojman’s one important premise is the response to the no-rest objection. He believed that the agent should aim at maximizing his or her own happiness as well as other people’s happiness and is best not to worry much about the need of those not in our primary circle.[1] .…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    British philosopher, John Stuart Mill, served many years as a member of parliament and worked diligently to bring forth liberal ideas. Amongst these ideas was the distinction of utilitarianism, or the act of doing what is right for the greatest number of people. Yet, just discussing the idea of right versus wrong for the masses was not enough, Mill’s determined there were two forms of utilitarianism; act, the direct form, or sanction, the indirect form. Much like formal logic with deductive and inductive reasoning, act and sanction utilitarianism strive for the same goal but have different ways of reaching it. Both forms of utilitarianism are seeking to find the best possible outcome for the largest number of people and using that as a measure of right versus wrong, yet by examining the differences of act utilitarianism and sanction utilitarianism, it will become clear that sanction utilitarianism is superior and more easily attainable.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    On this topic of gay marriage I’ve chosen the two ethical theories of utilitarianism and the Kantian ethics theory. On the pro side the utilitarianism theory plays a huge role when referring to this topic. Some may argue that it is constitutional and some may say that it just isn’t the right thing to do in this country. With this theory the actions are said to be judged in terms of promotion of human happiness. If someone is happy why it should matter what the law or government thinks. It’s important in addition with this topic because gay marriage is something that has been going on for a couple years now. The news and media has made it obvious, and with this argument there are two sides. Should gay marriage be acted upon as something normal…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    | Consequentialism: Decides what’s moral based only on the consequencesNon-consequentialism: Considers both the means and the consequences in order…

    • 4727 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In contrast, “Consequentialism” is a type of moral ethics where the belief is that a person should judge the morality of an action based purely on the good it will cause. Concerning the “Trolly Problem”, a consequentialist would pull the switch because it would save 5 people, while only killing one person. This would cause the greatest good that could come out of that situation.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Consequentialist theory is if the consequences are good, the action is right, if they are bad, the action is wrong and it base on the outcome of the action it is maximise happiness and minimise pain and it will depend of the consequences of the action it will get the greatest number even if the action is immoral but it can get a greatest number of happiness.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Consequential Theory or also known as, Consequentialism, in determining whether an act is considered as morally right or not, we rely solely on the consequence of the action itself. If the outcome of the action is positive, then the action is morally right. Based on consequentialism, we should opt for the action with the best overall consequences and we should always try to promote the best consequences. There are numerous types of consequentialism, however, we will focus mainly on egoistic consequentialism and utilitarianism. Egoistic consequentialism is where one only takes into consideration how the consequence of an act will affect oneself or a given group.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. A consequentialist principle holds that whether an act is right or wrong depends on the results of that act. It holds that the more good consequences an act produces, the better or right that act. The consequentialist view is that an act can be bad because it has a bad outcome for someone or bad consequences. This principle gives us the guidance when faced with a moral dilemma such as when a person should choose the action that maximizes good consequences.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Consider the argument that people may be acting out of duty/loyalty, it seems possible that people will act out of duty/loyalty to a cause rather than another person. Taking care of the environment can be a such cause. This means, firstly, that that WTP may not necessarily reflect individual well-being. Secondly, however, it is possible that individuals want environmental policy to take such moral duties into account. Individuals' WTP for environmental goods is a central concept in environmental CBA, but empirical data on this is not readily available from market prices.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A consequentialist theory of value judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based on the consequences that action has. ... A non-consequentialist theory of value judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based on properties intrinsic to the action, not on its consequences. Consequentialist means behaving in a manner that positive consequences which in a sense the ends justifies the means as well as what the rules say. However, when it comes to Non-consequentialist it is not based on consequences: therefore, it is not worry about consequences. Both consequentialist, and non-consequentialist are rooted by a sense of moral compass.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it possible for human beings to act from an apathetically objective point of view? People often attempt to create distance from their subjectivity to achieve goals within the world, but they cannot achieve true objectiveness. Engineers, natural scientists, judges and researchers all put aside their own biases to a degree in order to accomplish their fields, however they are not and cannot be entirely objective. Scientists—being the most publicly perceived objective figure—have human biases defined by their culture, history and language which they cannot separate themselves from. Even if they could separate from such things the pressures of career through competition and livelihood in the need to provide for themselves and loved ones creates…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every action has a consequence. Consequentialists believe that the level of good from that consequence determines the level of good of the action. To determine ethically who these actions are good for and which actions and decisions are important morally to the individual. Utilitarianism, what is morally good, plays a large role in determining this by achieving a greater good for everyone versus an individual greater good. Deciding what to do is the main point of moral assessment of acts. Consequentialism has three components to the theory: what makes acts morally wrong, procedure to make moral decisions, and the conditions that moral sanctions such as guilt and praise are appropriate (Hooker, 2011).…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianism was founded by Jeremy Bentham and further defined by John Stuart Mill to fully be developed into an ethical philosophy by the nineteenth century. In Utilitarianism, consequences are the only thing that matters. Motives only matter if the result is happiness being maximized. Utilitarianism has a foundation based on giving the majority of people the greatest quality of happiness. In order to do so, actions are never dependent on self-interest or self-sacrifice, and impartiality is often required.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays