Technology
Decision 5. Chris’s current counselor deferring him back to Teresa (for involuntary assessment) without Evelyn’s consent. No Parental consent: Unethical ACA
B.5.b. Responsibility to Parents and Legal Guardians AMHCA
2. Informed Consent (c) ASCA
B.1. Parent Rights and Responsibilities (a,b,c,d,e,f)
Similarities and Differences of applicable codes
Altogether, the codes all share and address a common importance of dual relationship which Teresa and Chris participated. The ACA went in further details regarding of conflict of interest as compared to both the AMHCA and ASCA which didn’t. Confidentiality was also elaborated in each codes and its prevalence in case 4. Not to mention, the codes also share technology usage for long distance counseling purposes.
Overarching decision or most important ethical issue to be addressed
The overarching or since most important ethical decision for case 4 is Teresa’s decision to provide counseling services to her close friend’s son Chris which is considered conflict of interest and not effective due to counselor’s subjectivity. Problem: Teresa participated in a dual relationship with a close friend’s son, which impacted her competency as an effective