SECTION ONE: Argument 1.A In the first argument 1.A , …show more content…
There are very few if any explanations provided by the plaintiff in explaining Eratosthenes laying naked on Euphiletos ’bed with his wife Melanthia. Furthermore, in Euphiletos’ testimony he states that an old woman who confronted him stated that "Eratosthenes…has not only seduced your wife but many other women, too. It's his specialty." (9). In this assessment, not only is Eratosthenes portrayed as an individual who committed a heinous crime, but he is also a repeat offender. Thus, there is an effort on the part of Euphiletos to rid himself and his community of someone who is a detriment to Athenian …show more content…
As stated in Euphiletos’ testimony, he had no material or personal gain from killing Eratosthenes (44). There would have to be reasonable doubt at the least of the idea that Euphiletos would premeditatedly murder Eratosthenes. The Council in evaluating any and all evidence on the matter should realize that there is great ambiguity with the limited evidence presented to them. The possibility of him being innocent can be as high if not greater than that of him being guilty. On balance, the state of Athens would commit a greater injustice in punishing an innocent man than in freeing a guilty man. Due to this particular case having only access to Euphiletos’ testimony and the laws at hand, it would seem preferable for Euphiletos to be not punished in the court of law.
Overall, the defense has won on all three arguments (1.a,1.b, 2.a) in the case of the The People of Athens vs. Euphiletos of Oea. The defense has helped established that Section 11 of the Law of Athens permits the lawful killing of a seducer. It asserted that Euphiletos of Oea was justified in the laws provided in the killing of Eratosthenes. The defense also was persuasive in arguing for Euphiletos to not be punished for his actions. On the whole, the Council of Athens should rule in the favor of the