Preview

Atomic Bomb Justified?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1658 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Atomic Bomb Justified?
Was the Atomic Bombing Justified? The Atomic Bomb made a very serious statement at a time when the world was in disarray (“Manhattan”). World War II was one of the most destructive times in history causing over 50 million deaths and leaving behind mental and physical casualties of war. (“World War II”) It started in September, 1939 when Germany invaded Poland and continued on a destructive path through Europe. Britain and France declared war on Germany. Two years prior in 1937, the Sino Japanese War was in full swing. Japan wanted to dominate China from a political and military standpoint and benefit from China’s many assets (“Sino”). United States, Britain and France aided China with financial aid through war supply contracts, which aggravated Japan to no end. In addition, the United States stood as a firm roadblock to Japan’s grander plans by stopping shipment of aircraft gasoline airplanes and airplane parts.
Since the war there have been numerous debates whether the use of the Atomic Bombs was justified. Well, it certainly was justified. The United States and Japan were at war for several years, along with many other countries. The Pearl Harbor bombing was unforgivable, sneaky, and claimed too many lives. It clearly conveyed that Japan would go to any extreme in an effort to gain power and control. Making the decision to move forward and bomb Japan is extremely hard to imagine, but it was the best solution and quickest answer to ending the war quickly, thus, saving further loss of lives.
Was it the right thing to do? If Japan’s invasion continued, Winston Churchill predicted that over one million Americans and British would have died. “We estimated that if we should be forced to carry this plan to its conclusion, the major fighting would not end until the latter part of 1946, at the earliest. I was informed that such operations might be expected to cost over a million casualties to American forces alone” (“Carroll, Doc. 11”).
On December 7, 1941, The



Cited: Fatman, The Manhattan Project Heritage. Preservation Association, inc. (22 March 2002) http://www.mphpa.org/classic/HISTORY/fat_man.htm Japanese nuclear weapon program: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_nuclear_weapon_program J. Robert Oppenheimer: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Robert_Oppenheimer , April 2, 2012 Little Boy, The Manhattan Project Heritage Pacific War: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_War April 3, 2012, Creative Commons Attribution Sino Japanese War, www.infoplease.com

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    World War II was a global war from 1939 to 1945. Japan surrendered on 15 August 1945, which brought the total victory of the Allies. Right before Japan’s surrender, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima and another one on Nagasaki. The atomic bombs caused great damage to Japan and killed estimated 129000 to 246000 people. However, the bombings helped to bring the war to an end. Whether President Truman should make the decision to drop the bombs is still a topic to debate. Due to the fact that it was the best decision Truman could make, the bombs ended the war, and reduced the loss at that time, President Truman was justified in his decision to drop the bombs on japan.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In August of 1945, the United States launched two atomic bombs on Japan; the first, in Hiroshima on August 6, and the second in Nagasaki a few days later. Despite the obvious diplomatic advantage to implementing one of the most intimidating weapons of that time, the United States’ tactics and goals behind dropping the atomic bombs were purely military oriented; the political benefit was merely an added bonus. The atomic bomb was necessary due to the Japanese’s refusal to surrender and the hundreds of thousands of lives at stake.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The reason that the bomb was dropped on Japan was because President Truman thought it was the best to get Japan to surrender. Japan was have given two different chances to surrender. But they just ignored them and went on with what they were doing. So bombing both Hiroshima and Nagasaki finally got them to surrender. Another reason was because it saved the American lives and to sped up the end of the war. With Japan surrendering, it saved 100,000 American Soldiers lives and 1,000,000 Japanese lives.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1945 began as a year of increasing tensions between countries as the war extended onto its sixth year. Military groups of the various countries involved were now beginning to seriously consider the conclusion of the war in terms of how the global ceasefire would be carried out and frankly, who would win. After the defeat of the Axis Powers in Europe, the focus had been turned towards the war in Asia and the Pacific Regions in which the Allied Forces of Great Britain, Australia and the USA were in conflict with the Axis power of Japan and her partners. Following the urge to end the war, the ‘Big Three’ made up of the three leaders of the major Allied Forces; Churchill, Stalin and Truman met for what is known as the Potsdam Conference to discuss ‘post-war world’ and as a result, the Potsdam Declaration was written giving the Japanese an opportunity to surrender or face “prompt and utter destruction”. Despite this opportunity, the Japanese chose to ignore the warning, thus, the US decided to administer the use of their newly developed nuclear weapons and drop the atomic bombs on Japan with both hope and belief that the Japanese would be forced to surrender and thus, ending the war on American terms. At the time, there was massive speculation surrounding the attack. However, the USA had entirely justifiable reasons behind the attack; therefore, they should have dropped the bombs on Japan. Firstly, Japan had been given the opportunity to surrender on peaceful terms but refused due to military being in control of the nation. Secondly, the only alternative was an invasion on Japan; however this action would not end lightly with predictions of huge casualties on the Americans’ part. Furthermore, the Japanese surrendered within a week of the dropping of the bombs proving the effectiveness of the USA’s actions.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not everybody, however, believe that Truman’s decision was right. Documents 2 is President Truman’s Chief of Staff, Admiral William E. Leahy, memoirs. In his memoirs he writes about why the bombing was so barbaric. He writes that he knew that Japan was ready to surrender and wars cannot be won by killing women and children.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wars have occurred for various different reasons all around the world, each nation involved using their best means of defensive and offensive attacks. Weaponry has been updated as time went on, leading us from arrows and bows to powerful guns. In the 1940s during World War II, however, one weapon in particular left a huge impact. The United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II was not justified due to the fact that it was ethically wrong, an excessive use of force, and unnecessary.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atomic bomb is the subject of much controversy. Since its first detonation in 1945, the entire world has heard the aftershocks of that blast. Issues concerning Nuclear Weapons sparked the Cold War. We also have the atomic bomb to thank for our relative peace in this time due to the fear of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). The effects of the atomic bomb might not have been the exact effects that the United States was looking for when they dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on Hiroshima and Nagasaki respectively (Grant, 1998). The original desire of the United States government when they dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not, in fact, the one more commonly known: that the two nuclear devices dropped upon Hiroshima and Nagasaki were detonated with the intention of bringing an end to the war with Japan, but instead to intimidate the Soviet Union. The fact of Japan's imminent defeat, the undeniable truth that relations with Russia were deteriorating, and competition for the division of Europe prove this without question.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Japan had an estimated army of 5,000,000 men, they were on the verge of imminent collapse and the two atomic bombs that were dropped on them were not necessary to obtain Japan’s surrender. America’s primary reason for using the atomic bombs on Japan was to intimidate the Soviet Union so that the Soviet Union would stay out of the war with Japan and to demonstrate our world dominance, rather than dropping the bombs solely to induce Japan’s unconditional surrender.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the summer of 1945 the United States was entering the final stages of World War II. One could assume that ending the war quickly was a priority. President Truman was demanding “unconditional surrender” from Japan. In a statement he released on May 8th, he described unconditional surrender as “Our blows will not cease until the Japanese military and naval forces lay down their arms in unconditional surrender. Just what does the unconditional surrender of the armed forces mean for the Japanese people? It means the end of the war. It means the termination of the influence of the military leaders who have brought Japan to the present brink of disaster.… Unconditional surrender does not mean the extermination or enslavement of the Japanese people. (Alperovitz, Gar (2010-12-29). The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb (p. 39).)” So if the war were to end the Japanese would have to unconditionally surrender, secretary of state James Byrnes said as much, “For instance, in his 1947 book Speaking Frankly, James F. Byrnes declared without qualification: “Had the Japanese Government listened to [Ambassador to Soviet Union] Sato and surrendered unconditionally, it would not have been necessary to drop the atomic bomb. (Alperovitz, p. 34)” The Japanese refused to surrender because of the terms they would be conceding to. They wanted a guarantee that their emperor would be protected and they felt unconditional surrender would put him in jeopardy. “The reality is that as the summer of 1945 progressed, most U.S. leaders fully realized that the only serious condition Japan’s leaders sought was an assurance that the Emperor would not be eliminated. (Alperovitz, p.34)” One could conclude that the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of Japan’s refusal to unconditionally surrender. There is also belief that the atomic bomb was dropped to intimidate the Soviet Union. As historian Barton Berstein put it, “The combat use…

    • 1235 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    To the dismay of many people on August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was used in the history of mankind as a part of warfare. Many people died as a result of these bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and because of the bombings, Japan knew it had been defeated, so it soon afterwards surrendered to America. I believe that the bombings were necessary in order to make Japan surrender because Harry Truman, the President of the United States of America, knew that the Japanese military was not going to slow down on its war effort unless the Commander in Chief reacted in an extreme manner to cripple the Japanese war effort enough so that Japan had no…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the history of the United States, people have been debating over the issue of US using the atomic bomb on Japan. Some may feel that United States was justified and others might feel that US was not justified. The usage of atomic bomb in Japan might seem wrong today, but it was the best option during the war. The United States was justified in using the atomic bombs against Japan in World War II.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Truman and the U.S. was not justified in using nuclear weapons to force Japan to capitulate. President Truman’s goal was to get Japan to surrender without thinking about the repercussions that Japan would face after the bombings. Many people died that day, and thousands were exposed to the harmful radiation from the bombs. People either died from the radiation or they are facing the aftermath of the heavy exposure of radiation. Numerous principles from the “Just War” doctrine were broken in order to get Japan to forfeit. People were considered objects that could be thrown aside. Though the U.S.’s motives were acceptable, its ways of executing it were unethical and…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I'm not trying to justify that what Japan did to the United States was ok. All I'm trying to prove is that there could’ve been better ways to end the war with Japan. Atomic bombs are not good thing. They can seriously harm the environment in which you live, forcing you to move out of your own home. In worst cases it can harm you. Let's just hope they won't ever be used…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays