The idealist concept views culture as the ‘informing spirit’ (Williams 1981, p.2). Williams (1981, p.2) mentioned that this view of culture is more apparent in ‘specific cultural’ activities such as language, art styles and intellectual works that manifest values into individuals. It is believed as the ‘realm of moral, spiritual and aesthetic values which exists largely independent of and above society’ (Dearman 2014, p.18). Matthew Arnold and F.R. Leavis were the critical figures of this view of culture. Arnold (1960 cited in Barker 2008, p.40) has described culture as ‘the best that has been thought and said in the world’. There is this distinction made between high and low culture, which has a selective characteristic because the idealist favours the high culture. Arnold assumed that high culture constitutes activities of ‘reading, observing, thinking’ which challenges the individual’s mind (Barker 2008, p.40), for example readings from William Shakespeare and Charles Dickens. This is also due to separateness from society whereby the
References: Adorno, T.W. 1964, ‘Television and the patterns of mass culture’, in C. Greenfield (ed.), ATS2450/3450 unit reader, Monash Print & Design Gippsland, Australia, pp.30-33. Adorno, T.W. & Horkheimer, M. 1977, ‘The culture industry: Enlightenment as mass deception’, in C Barker, C. 2008, Cultural studies: theory & practice, 3rd edn, Sage Publications, London.