Preview

Austronesians

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1544 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Austronesians
The Austronesians as Viewed by Peter Bellwood, Wilhelm Solheim II, and Zeus Salazar
Prepared by Jezza Mae S. Dajac

The term Austronesian contextually refers to a population group present in Southeast Asia or Oceania who speaks, or had ancestors who spoke, one of the Austronesian languages. Apart from the Polynesian people of Oceania, the Austronesian people include: Taiwanese Aborigines, the majority ethnic groups of East Timor, Indonesia and Malaysia.
There had been several theories that posit the Austronesians as the origin of the Philippine population. Among the leading proponents of these ideas are Australian National University professor Peter Bellwood, American anthropologist and the most senior practitioner of archaeology in Southeast Asia Wilhelm Solheim II, and Filipino anthropologist Zeus Salazar. Their viewpoints are to be separately presented here.
Bellwood's Austronesian Diffusion Theory/ Out-of-Taiwan (OOT) Hypothesis/ Mainland Origin Hypothesis
Rather than believing that Austroloids were the ancestors of the Filipino race, Professor Bellwood argued that Austronesians were the roots of the population inhabiting most of the Asian territories today. His Out-of-Taiwan Hypothesis is based largely on linguistics and is mainly derived from American linguistic Robert Blust’ model of Austronesian diffusion, lately known as the Blust model. Bellwood incorporated archaeological data to Blust’s idea to arrive at his own theory.
He posited that between 4500 BCE and 4000 BCE, developments in agricultural technology in the Yunnan Plateau in China created pressures which drove certain people to migrate to Taiwan. This is what explains the term “Out-of-Taiwan Hypothesis”. Bellwood also believed that these people either already had or began to develop a unique language of their own, which he referred to as “Proto-Austronesian”.
By around 3000-3500 BCE, these groups started differentiating into three or four distinct subcultures, and by 2500 to 1500 BC,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Heritage Assessment

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Agoncillo, T., & Guerrero, M. (1987). History of the Filipino people. Quezon City, Philippines: Garcia Publishing Company.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 15 Outline

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    -Historians have debated for years about Polynesian people and their sailing.Despite traveling over the vast Pacific Ocean and not being able to navigateusing the land (because of their distance from it, they could not follow the shoreline) The Polynesians left no written records on how they navigated, andhistorians debate over whether they were actually able to navigate or whetherthey just got lost and found their way through the chain of Hawaiian islands, eventhough some were over 2000 miles away from their home ports. Others say thatpeoples from the Americas settled there instead of the Polynesians, however thenative language has ties to Malaysia, the Pacific west, and the Asian continent,disproving this theory. -In 1976, a Polynesian crew proved that it was possible to navigate the Pacificwaters using only observations of stars, currents, and land.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    16. In tribes which, as early as 3000 BCE, began to spread their language and agricultural…

    • 4373 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Polynesians constitute a small-scale test of how environment determines the path of society. Between 1200 BC and 500 AD, Polynesians scattered over thousands of Pacific Islands with great variety of area, isolation, elevation, climate,…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Later on, those people were conquered and killed by a second wave of Polynesians. This left behind almost no trace of their existence besides graves and temples that they had built before they were killed. The language and culture of native…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    (See Appendix A, Fig.1). There is no real evidence of who the orangutan’s ancestors were. The…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Annette B. Weiner describes her fieldwork in the Trobriand Islands of Papua New Guinea as entering a world without cultural guideposts. She was fully aware and expected to find difficulty with learning a new language and of letting go of her own cultural assumptions. Weiner studied the Trobriand Islands via the writings of Bronislaw Kasper Malinowski and thus her expectations were set by fieldwork performed sixty years earlier. Not to mention that Malinowski was a man, of a different time and therefore was almost of a different culture himself.…

    • 501 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Polynesian Origin

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The origin of the Polynesian people has been one of the most disputed scientific mysteries regarding ancient maritime migrations. The roots of the people of Polynesia had always thought to have been South Asia, namely the island nations like Indonesia. This was the common dogma until Thor Heyerdahl, a ethnologist at the University of Oslo, Norway, set sail across the Pacific ocean on a balsa wood raft to declare the true ancestors of the Polynesians to be the South Americans. Dr. Heyerdahl initially began to doubt the dogma of Polynesian origin when he was on his honeymoon in the Polynesian Islands. He heard a chieftain tell the creation story of the local Polynesian natives. The tale told of tall, fair-skinned, towheaded men that descended…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    migration originated from and there have been debates about it. Some state that the migration was from south east Asia, sailing from the west to the east, but many along with Thor Heyerdahl states that the migration was from east to…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From "(ca. 600,000-6,500 B.C.E)" (Kishlansky, Geary, & O'Brien, 2008, p. 7,10). the Paleolithic and Neolithic era occurred. The Paleolithic era evolved to the Neolithic era. The transformation of these eras are a big advancement in society, in the fact that the Paleolithic era focused on speech and religion while the Neolithic era focusing on the improvement in settlements, and tools. These four compelling transitions from the huntinggathering to food-producing society: Increased technology, advancements in management, the formation of a tiered society, and mercantilism…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Timeline of Fiji

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages

    |1500 BC |Fiji was suggested to have settled by Polynesians before Micronesian, but there lacks evidence that this happened either in oral and |…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    KaspilQ2

    • 793 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Robert Fox stated, in his theory of peopling, that there were already people living in the Philippine islands and the proof for that is the skull of a prehistoric man found in the Tabon Caves named the Tabon Man. Aside from the skull, there were also some artifacts that were discovered in the same place, hinting that there was already a civilization around the time the Tabon Man may had been alive. Fox claimed that people of different countries then migrated to the Philippines through the land bridges that once connected the country to other countries, like Borneo. According to Fox, the Filipinos, through migrating and the immigrants, were the mediators of different cultures. They disseminated various cultures into their own; thus, making a whole new different culture which is purely Filipino. The peopling theory of Wilhelm Solheim II, which is named the Nusantao Maritime Trading and Communication Network, however, mentioned that the Philippine prehistory could not be explained merely through migration. He based his theory on the similar pieces of certain artifacts found in the country and the surrounding countries and saw a pattern. He then came up with the idea that such happened because of trade. There were lobes that specified which countries were involved in such trades and in those lobes the circulation of cultures happened. To compare, both of these people agreed that there were already people in the Philippines then and they were civilized, based on the artifacts found. The difference is that Fox saw the development of the civilization, and its people, was because of the exposure of the Filipinos to new ideas through the immigrants. Solheim, on the other hand, made known to all that, as seen in the artifacts found, the trade between countries in different lobes was responsible for the spread and dissemination of culture.…

    • 793 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philippine History

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The oldest human fossil remains are found in Palawan, on the western fringe of the archipelago. These remains are about 30,000 years old, suggesting that the first human migrations to the islands took palce during the last Ice Age, when land bridiges connected the archipelago to mainland Asia and Borneo.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    * They colonized Marquesas, settled in the Hawaiian Islands, Easter Island, New Zealand, and mainland Americas.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pre Colonial

    • 2168 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Before the colonizer invades the Philippines our ancestors had already developed the oral tradition which is said to be the start of the Philippine literature. Even on the precolonial period, studies shows that early Filipinos had grew in accordance with what surrounds them and truly dependent to nature.…

    • 2168 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics