Marquis C. Saddler
Professor Nolan
SCI115
February 26, 2013
The title of this article is, “How Hard Would It Be for Avian Flu to Spread?” In this article two teams of scientist genetically altered a deadly flu virus (H5N1) to make it more contagious. The two teams consisted of scientist from Erasmus Medical Center, in the Netherlands, and the other at the University of Wisconsin (McNeil & Grady, 2012). Some argued that the research should have never been done, while others believe that the research may be beneficial for finding vaccines and antiviral drugs to combat the virus. There is one point on which the factions agree: The ability of a virus to spread easily from person to person is the key to determining whether it can cause a pandemic (McNeil & Grady, 2012). The main risk factor for catching bird flu is working at a chicken farm or a live bird market (McNeil & Grady, 2012). According to McNeil & Grady, (2012), “The rare cases of apparent human-to-human transmission have usually involved long, close contact, like a mother caring for a sick daughter with the flu”. The new virus which has been tested by both teams was used in …show more content…
ferrets, because the flu behaves almost the same in humans. There is one reassuring note in the unsettling findings from the two teams. Fearsome though it may be, the new virus appears to be vulnerable to existing vaccines and flu drugs (McNeil & Grady, 2012).
This article is related to this course because not only is everything around us related to biology one way or another, but in our text books it talks briefly about how viruses affect humans. In the text book, “Biology Today and Tomorrow without Physiology”, there is a section in chapter 13, Early life Forms and the Viruses, which talk about H5N1 and other new flus. The text gives great insight as to how hard it would be for the avian flu to spread from human-to-human. According to Starr, C., Evers, C.A., & Starr, L. (2013), fortunately person-to-person transmission of H5N1 virus is exceedingly rare.
Picking this article for me was a no brainer, because I’ve always been interested in things such as virus that could potentially take out half of the world’s population in one fell swoop.
I have read many stories in history books and television about the Bubonic Plague killing a third of the world population before they figured out how and why people were getting sick, and figured out a cure. My health and my family’s health is important to me, so naturally knowing that there is a new strain of flu that can potentially harm us would be important to know. I often wonder if something like the Plague would come along again and how long would it take for the world to find a cure. Hopefully the people of the world will never have to find out, because this time it could be way
worst.
Research to find the cures for such viruses should be funded by the government. We the people pay taxes, so we the people should decide how it is spent. It would not hurt for a little extra private funding to come from somewhere else other than out of the taxpayers’ pockets. Something as serious as people’s lives should not be debated upon, because it doesn’t matter where the money to fund such research is coming from it just matters that a cure can be found for viruses and disease that can catastrophic to the world’s population.
Reference:
Starr, C., Evers, C.A., & Starr, L. (2013). Biology today and tomorrow without physiology (4th ed.).
Belmont, CA: Brooks / Cole Publishing Co. (Cengage Learning)