Battle Of Blenheim Analysis

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Battle of Blenheim and identify how the application, utilization, or availability of intelligence assets from both sides of that time, would likely result in an alternate outcome to produce a well thought out analytical paper. If French Commander Tallard had used his intelligence assets as used by John Churchill Duke of Marlborough, the results of the battle would have likely resulted in the French winning the battle. Having experience in French tactics, intelligence collection and the use of revolutionary civil consideration, led John Churchill to become an expert battlefield tactician, allowing the Duke of Marlborough to defeating the powerful French army.
In 1674, at the age of 24, John Churchill served under the great French Commander Henry de la tour d'auvergne, Vicomte de Turenne. In the book Marlborough and the riser of the British Army, it says, " It is true that there is more than one close parallel between Turenne tactics and those by which Marlborough” (Atkinson, 1921, p. 53). “Thirty
The greatest loss of the battle comes from the second and third order effects of the battle of Blenheim. Bavaria lost their chance at one of the crowns up for grabs, and France's leader Louis XIV could no longer hope for German princes to switch to his side. The powerful French military was no longer undefeated and would continue to lose territory and dominance.
The greatest loss of the battle comes from the second and third order effects of the battle of Blenheim. Bavaria lost their chance at one of the crowns up for grabs, and France's leader Louis XIV could no longer hope for German princes to switch to his side. The ruling French military was no longer undefeated and would continue to lose territory and