Gettysburg provides an excellent historical example for studying the link between decision making and the battlefield (Goss, 2004). The battle is a prime example of what was meant as a decisive battle that secured an advantage for the Union Army, yet neither the North or South gained decisive …show more content…
Lee and George Meade were seeking to crush their opponent’s army and win the war. Lincoln encouraged many of his commanders, including Meade, to use the Northern army’s sheer numbers to crush the Confederacy. While Lee hoped to crush the Union army’s morale with his own troops and superior strategy. With the victory of the battle of Gettysburg, the North gained a crucial boost in morale but lost many troops in a less than total victory. Inversely the South lost morale, the loss of confederate troops was underwhelming in proportion to the Union losses, the news of retreat and details of the battle cost the South morale.
The battle of Gettysburg was one of the bloodiest battles ever in American history with well over fifty thousand men dead in just three days of fighting. Both Confederacy and Union troops employed different tactics and turned the tides; however, in the end the Union had greater success which culminated in the defeated the Confederates. The greatest lessons from this battle are the importance of a good leader who encourages participation from their troops. Ultimately, the Union morale lifted by this victory and others went on to win the civil war and shape the United States as we know it