Preview

battle of salamis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1041 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
battle of salamis
As much as The Battle of Salamis was a significant victorious accomplishment for the Greek Navy, it was equally as important to the Persians as subdue against their Empire. As the reader embarks on a journey into a review on one of the greatest battle of all times, here is a brief summary about the Author, his background and the battle of Salamis through his eyes. Barry Strauss is currently the professor of history and classics at the prestigious Cornell University. He has been published countless times in well-known books and scholarly journals as well as in The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times.

In his Book, The Battle Of Salamis- “The Naval Encounter That Saved Greece—and Western Civilization”, Barry Strauss illustrates scenes on Ancient Greece that bring the Story to life. Strauss informs the reader on the account leading up to the battle, the events instantly preceding the battle, the battle itself and the repercussion. Strauss’s objective is clear and supported with evidence throughout the text; to persuade the reader on the content of the encounter that saved Greece and the Western Civilization, and to inform the reader why this battle was so significant for the growth of Greece and western civilization. To exemplify this, an excessive amount of Supporting details are suggested.

In the text, the reader is left wondering with a very small amount of information on the battle of Salamis and how the conclusion came about. Despite the limited number of sources Strauss attained to support the evidence in the text, Strauss makes up for it with a vast figure of speculation on action, motives and conclusions. With the information he does exhibit, Strauss organizes his material in sections. The depiction leading up to the battle, the events after the battle, the battle itself and the outcome, therefore infers a logical causal sequence. Each section is a number of chapters in length, and each chapter begins with a picture of one of the key individuals

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In Chapter 1, the author assesses the unique and eternal achievements of 5th century BCE Athenian culture. She introduces several basic dichotomies that define her understanding of the writers and events of the period in the later chapters.…

    • 4035 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article states that the Greeks probably did not use a burning mirror which is often believed to have been used to defend themselves from attacks by the Roman navy about 2,200 years ago and provides three reasons of support. The professor, however, explains that the reasons are not compelling and refutes each of the author's reasons.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With background knowledge of the Persians tactics and strategy, Miltiades was able to devise certain tactics which enable the victory of the Greeks. He ordered that the Athenian army was situated with strong wings and a weak centre marching the length of the Persian 's army; the Persians processed a strong centre but weak wings. This enables the Greeks to attack the weak Persian wings. Another tactic developed by Miltiades was that the Greeks were order to charge at the Persian army to neutralise the Persians archery; one of their main tactics. In the end the Greek won a decisive victory against the Persians; seven ships were taken and 6400 Persians troops were killed in comparison to 162 Athenians.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Final Study Guide

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The great Persian invasion under Xerxes was a crucial factor in cementing the ties of Greek ethnicity and a sense of separation from other peoples. It is no accident that the great playwright Aeschylus asked that his tombstone be engraved only with a mention of participation in the war and was content to omit his dramatic victories. What were the causes of this invasion? What was the Persian strategy? How did the Greeks respond to the threat? What were the crucial battles in the war and finally why did the Persians fail?…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reasons for the Greek victory against the Persians in 490 to 480/479 BC was a mixture of exceptional leadership, skilful tactics and strategy, superior weapons and soldiers, and Greek unity. Strong leadership was the most important aspect of the Greek defence, as without the intelligence and bravery of the leaders, the Greeks would have been easily defeated. As a result of the excellent leadership; Greek tactics, strategy, and unity were greatly strengthened. Combined with their better weapons and soldiers, the Greeks held the advantage and seized opportunities at the perfect moment. Also, with each victory the Greeks grew more confident of success and defiant of the Persian attempts to invade. The poor organisation and disarray of their enemy led to an undermining of the Persian might and further improved Greece's chances of success.…

    • 2672 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greek offensive, although contributed to Miltiades as a brilliant strategic decision, is an important historiographical issue for modern historians. Herodotus tells us that opinion among the Athenian commanders was divided with some opposed to attacking with their heavily outnumbered force. Others, especially Miltiades supported an offensive strategy. Miltiades is credited with persuading the war archon Callimachus through a stirring speech to cast his deciding vote in favour of an offensive strategy. Herodotus in his narrative has Miltiades say ‘If we refuse to fight, I have little doubt that the result will be bitter”. However it has also been suggested that the Greek offensive was based on the apparent absence of the Persian cavalry which Herodotus fails to mention. This is puzzling as most modern historians acknowledge that a Persian cavalry force had already disembarked from the fleet onto land and Herodotus said the Persians chose Marathon because it was “the best ground for cavalry to manoeuvre in.”. It has also been assumed that Miltiades deployed the Greek phalanx with strong wings and a weak centre, a strategy that secured…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On thermopylea and platea

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Today I shall be arguing and elaborating upon the thesis that the battle at Thermopylae was instrumental in insuring the victory at Plataea against the Persian army as it allowed for Greece to build up its army’s in preparation for the upcoming battle. I shall attempt to prove this statement by discussing various aspects of the battle of Thermopylae and the battle of Plataea such as battle tactics, size of the Greek and Persian armies and the overall intent and outcome of both battles.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If there was one thing Sparta wanted out of the Peloponnesian War, it was to bring down Athens. Given Athens' rising strength and its ability to acquire an ever-larger navy of vessels from contributions paid by its dependents and allies, Sparta appeared to be concerned (Cartwright, 2018). As a matter of fact, Athens was becoming stronger and winning more and more wars thanks to its allies. Furthermore, Sparta believed that if nothing was done, Corinth, another major Greek state, was going to be forced to go along with Athens (Cartwright, 2018). When discussing ancient Greece, we frequently concentrate on Athens and Sparta, two of the principal towns.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: 1dkennedy.org. (2004, July 15). The Greek Myths: 1 - Robert Graves. Retrieved from dkennedy.org Book reviews: http://www.dkennedy.org/C2025243227/E518045992/index.html…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Themistocles was responsible for the Greek victory in the Persian wars to a considerable extent. The key to Athens' strength in the 5th Century BC was in this general and statesman and therefore, as Greek victory relied so heavily on Athens, Themistocles vitally contributed to the outcome of the Persian king’s invasion of 480-479 BC. His early life reflects the character and skills developed that were responsible for these contributions. Five pivotal roles he undertook were of varying degrees responsible for Greece’s success against Xerxes. Themistocles possessed an incredible foresight and began to prepare against the inevitable Persian invasion early on, his political leadership to a domestic level in Athens contributed to the state’s naval strength, and similarly, his political leadership in the conception of a united Greek defence was a significant achievement. As well as this, Themistocles’ strategy in key battle such as Thermopylae, Artemisium and Salamis were vital to to war effort.…

    • 4252 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Athens and Sparta, were the strongest cities , Athens and Sparta competed with the supreme political influence of Greece . Athens and Sparta's men always trained to be ready for war. Sparta's main strength lay in its ground troops, while Athens's powerful navy controlled the seas. The tide was turned in the Persian Wars when the legendary 300 Spartans led by King Leonidas slowed Xerxes' advance at Thermopylae. The Persians were later ultimately defeated at the Battle of Salamis by the superior strategy of…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thermopylae Speech

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Armies of the past : Going to War In Ancient Greece, by Adrian Gilbert, (Franklin Watts, 2000)…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pericles calls on his people to focus their anger on the true enemy, for he is the same man that he was at the beginning of the war. Athenians want to surrender now that their backs are against the wall, but when they were on top and had no quarrel they wished to fight. Pericles believes that the people are not in the right state of mind to be making such rash claims against him, “now that this great reversal has come upon you in so short a time you are too low in your minds to stand by your decisions, for it makes your thoughts slavish when something unexpected happens suddenly and defies your best-laid plans” (Woodruff, 53).He does not want the Athenians to be so dismissive of their greatness, they are still great and should in the face of disaster remain great without giving up. Pericles reassures the assembly that their navy is still their greatest advantage and that no one, not even the King of Persia, could stop their navy. For this was key in gaining back what they had lost, “what you should remember is that it is more shameful to lose what you have than to fail in an attempt to get more” (Woodruff,54).…

    • 2100 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athens Vs Sparta Essay

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In conclusion, Greece’s life was impacted by an intense fight between the two city-states, leaving a big mark in history. All just because of Athens and Sparta’s different ways of teaching, forms of government, and the treatment of women, can affect Greece entirely. Wow! It’s surprising that jealousy can rise up between two city-states, and start a huge battle. Although, was it really worth it? This war only led to having them more open to attack to other cities, and lots of citizens ended up dying or being severely injured. The city-states lost everything, and was almost completely wiped off the…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In her conclusion Glynn puts forward the idea that the motif of a Herakles and Triton locked in battle is connected to the “Athenian amphibious success”, in regards to the battle for possession of Salamis. This in turn, she argues, is connected to “Peisistratean Athens”, and the tyrannical family that held the city at the time. Suggesting that Peisistratos skillfully manipulated this and other myths so that they were more suited to his own purposes. Creating, in a sense a different iconology that better reflected this time in…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays