Without this case serving a vital purpose when it comes to American law I can only imagine the amount of breach of contracts that would hold people liable for things they had no clue were even possible or that could take place. This is why the case of Baxendale v. Hadley was such a huge impact. The case let it be known for future cases that when it comes to the law many things are circumstantial especially when it comes down to who is held responsible. Had Baxendale also not made a counter argument and accepted the ruling then the case would not have made history and could have greatly impacted any future cases in relation to the contract law concept of foreseeable damages. After reviewing the case I see a lack in communication can also be a big factor in the ruling of a case. Had there been an open window of communication between Hadley not being able to continue work with his mill and Pickford not being able to deliver the part on time then no one might have looked into to suing one
Without this case serving a vital purpose when it comes to American law I can only imagine the amount of breach of contracts that would hold people liable for things they had no clue were even possible or that could take place. This is why the case of Baxendale v. Hadley was such a huge impact. The case let it be known for future cases that when it comes to the law many things are circumstantial especially when it comes down to who is held responsible. Had Baxendale also not made a counter argument and accepted the ruling then the case would not have made history and could have greatly impacted any future cases in relation to the contract law concept of foreseeable damages. After reviewing the case I see a lack in communication can also be a big factor in the ruling of a case. Had there been an open window of communication between Hadley not being able to continue work with his mill and Pickford not being able to deliver the part on time then no one might have looked into to suing one