Preview

Baxendale V. Pickford Case Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Baxendale V. Pickford Case Summary
The case is about Hadley who owned a mill, which used a steam engine manufactured by W. Joyce and Company to make corn into flour. The engine crank shaft broke and in order to get the engine running again the broken shaft needed shipped back to Joyce and Company so they could create a replacement. Then Hadley contacted Pickford and company, which is owned by Baxendale. Hadley paid Pickford to ship the broken shaft to Joyce and Company ASAP and was promised to deliver it by the next day. However, it took longer to deliver because of Pickford and work was unable to continue. Hadley then sued Baxendale for breach of contract for the damages and for the revenue that was lost due to the mill being shut down. Baxendale argued that the money lost had nothing to do with the shipping contract. Hadley won and Baxendale also had to …show more content…
Without this case serving a vital purpose when it comes to American law I can only imagine the amount of breach of contracts that would hold people liable for things they had no clue were even possible or that could take place. This is why the case of Baxendale v. Hadley was such a huge impact. The case let it be known for future cases that when it comes to the law many things are circumstantial especially when it comes down to who is held responsible. Had Baxendale also not made a counter argument and accepted the ruling then the case would not have made history and could have greatly impacted any future cases in relation to the contract law concept of foreseeable damages. After reviewing the case I see a lack in communication can also be a big factor in the ruling of a case. Had there been an open window of communication between Hadley not being able to continue work with his mill and Pickford not being able to deliver the part on time then no one might have looked into to suing one

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This case is an interesting one because it gets right into the core of the confliction between the proprieties of contractual agreement. This case is focused primarily on Osborne Development Corp. and the multiple defects customers are experiencing with their homes. These upset customers are suing this Corporation in attempts to collect reparations for the discrepancies faced. The homeowners who purchased homes form Osborne Development Corp. (ODC) negligently purchased these homes. According to the Home Buyers Warranty ( HBW), “ Any and all claims disputes and controversies by or between the Homeowner, the Builder, the Warrant Insure and/or HBW…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Description: Terry Fedrick appeals from a take nothing judgment following a bench trial. In one issue, Fedrick argues that he was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law in light of factual findings made by the trial court. We affirm. * * * Fedrick is a truck driver, and he owns a commercial truck manufactured in 1994. The truck apparently developed a short circuit in the wiring and caught fire while it was parked outside Fedrick's home. Fedrick was able to extinguish the fire, and had the truck towed to Nichols's repair facility. Nichols agreed to attempt to repair the truck. One of his employees began the repair job, but could not complete the repair because a part had not yet arrived. The truck was parked outside Nichols's facility overnight when it caught fire again and was burned beyond…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case begins with the relationship between California and Hawaiian Sugar Company (C&H), the purchaser, and Sun Ship, Inc., the contractor for the design and delivery of a vessel to ship raw sugar for C&H from Hawaii to California. Sun Ship went into contract with C&H on November 14, 1979 and agreed upon the delivery of the vessel on June 30, 1981, one and three quarter years, for the agreed upon amount of $20,405,000 . According to Cheeseman (2013) a liquidated damages clause, defined as “damages that parties to a contract agree in advance should be paid if the contract is breached”, was included and called for $17,000 per day for each day that the vessel was not delivered. Additional details from Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1986 indicate that C&H went into another agreement with a company by the name of “Halter” for the purchase of "one oceangoing catamaran tug boat" that was, unbeknownst to Sun Ship, supposed to connect with the vessel that Sun Ship was contracted to deliver. Sun completed the vessel, which was…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: In February 2001, Speelman moved into a BHA subsidized apartment with her two minor children. The following month Speelman’s probation was revoked, and she was sentenced to 75 days in jail. BHA was aware Speelman was on probation. She then arranged for her 19 year old daughter, Audrey Larson, to care for her children at her apartment. BHA was not notified Speelman had been incarcerated or of the new occupant in the residence. Office Lowell English, BHA’s police liason, was responding to a complaint about Speelman’s children running around the apartment complex at night. After his visit, officer English found Speelman was incarcerated. On June 2, BHA sent a notice stating Speelman’s voucher payments will be terminated as of July 31st. The letter also states Speelman has the right to appeal the decision by writing a request for a hearing within 14 days. Even though Larson had access to Speelman’s mail, she was specifically instructed only to open mail from the children’s school. Speelman returned to her apartment on June 17th to find the termination letter, and sent a request for a hearing on June 23rd, which is seven days after the deadline. BHA denied the request stating her response was untimely, and she lost her funds.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Taxpayers could deduct expense they substantiated with receipts and showed were related to their activities. But taxpayers were denied deductions for expenses they didn’t substantiate or show were related to…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Smith v. United States, the plaintiff, John Angus Smith, was convicted of engaging in drug-trafficking, which would have granted him a five year sentence had he not “used” a firearm in regards to the incident. As stated in statute 924(c)(1), the use of firearm in relations to a drug-trafficking crime enhanced the sentence, and turned it into a 30-year sentence. The argument at hand is whether the term “use” was to be taken from a broad dictionary definition or in the ordinary meaning. The majority of the court argued that the term “use” should not be limited to the intended use of the firearm (as a weapon) as they exemplified cases of which the firearm was used as a bludgeon even though that was not it’s intended purpose, yet…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Florida v. Bostick was a felony drug trafficking case which set precedence to the legality of random police searches of passengers aboard public buses and trains pertaining to said passenger’s fourth amendment rights. Shortly after boarding a bus departing from Miami headed for Atlanta, Terrance Bostick was approached by members of the Broward County Sheriffs department acting as part of a drug interception task force and without particularly suspicion was questioned by officers. Broward county sheriff officers advised Mr. Bostick of his right to not consent to a search of his personal belongings and then asked his permission to carry out the search. Terrance Bostick granted sheriffs officers request by consenting to the search which revealed a felonious amount…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    legal summary

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page

    Facts: the case between the two cases were intense, Lionel was trading Mikes Trains House Secrets, Once Mikes Train House Inc. found out in they began arguing in court on June, 7th 2006. The court took almost 6 months to come to the ruling. Defendant Lionel, L.L.C., is found guilty and liable for misappropriation of trade secrets and the use of blueprints, awarding the Plaintiff, Mike's Train House Inc., over $40 million in damages and $11 million in lost profit. MTH identified its "trade secrets" the joint and liability of the amount of the damage awarded. Lionel also appeals the court, granting MTH's request for order, Because Lionel argues that the court admitted expert testimony.…

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Grutter v. Bollinger was also a case in which race was still used as an admission factor. This case involved the admission process to The University of Michigan's law school. Just as the University of Texas they used the hard data and soft data process to admit different students into their program. Race was used as a plus factor under the soft data category and the law school was seeking critical mass by becoming more diverse within its student population. Yet, the question was how did the university know the race of the person? As they did not have a so called race check box. They asked different questions such as where the students are from or what language was spoken within their homes. The court again said this was ok, as they school was…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts: This lawsuit involves Dred Scott, an African American slave and his owner due to the passing of his previous owner Dr. Emerson, John F. A. Sanford. John F.A Sanford is the brother to the wife of Dr. Emerson. Dred Scott sued for his freedom in the Missouri Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis on April 6, 1846 . Dred Scott’s legal suit is for assault and false imprisonment: “A slave could be punished and kept as property, but a free person could not.”…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In tort law this is a groundbreaking case in our nations history. It helped launch an idea of proximate case. This new meaning would consider that a defendant is only liable the harm if it is reasonably foreseeable. Proximate cause is now has a boundary on the range of tort liability. I believe that the majority opinion is stronger because of their argument for proximate cause. If the box did not have explosives in it the accident would not have occurred so there was no way the workers could have foreseen the explosion because they thought it was a normal…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before 2004, courthouses and other public buildings differed from how they are today. There was one thing that these buildings did not have, a handicapped entrance. At this time, it could be very embarrassing to be handicapped because you could do nothing for yourself. If you wanted to enter a public building, you had to ask someone to carry you in, or even worse, you might have to crawl up stairs to enter! This was a definite problem that had been around for years, however, no one addressed it.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Texas V Johnson was a supreme court decision involving Gregory Lee Johnson and the state of Texas. This decision happened in 1989 on June, 21. The court ruled that flag burning is protected under the first amendment therefore it is not considered illegal. This decision is important because it sets a precedent for the future of protest and free “speech” including non-oral speech in the first amendment. I am interested in this case because I believe flag burning should be illegal and punishable by jail which is opposite of the ruling in this decision. I am interested in learning the other side of the argument and expanding my knowledge beyond just my opinion. (Texas v Johnson, Wikipedia)…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court accepted that the “critical mass” concept was not an “outright racial balancing”, where race was used as a factor in the admission process (Alexander 151). Therefore, the Court held that diversity is a compelling interest for the University of Michigan Law School as long as race is not the only factor considered for admission. In addition, the Court concluded that the “benefits of diversity are substantial” and “promotes cross racial understanding, helps to break down racial stereotypes, and enables students to better understand persons of difference races” (Chemenrisky 772). Moreover, “the Court accepted the university’s argument that the education of all students is enhanced with a diverse student body”…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This case is about Robert Allen who was trying to sell Bayfield a Drive system to work with a shearing line that they had recently purchased from Mangna Machinery. Allen lost the sale and was reviewing his call reports to see where he went wrong. The Exhibits shows that Allen did certain thing right, and he could’ve done more to keep the sale and to seal the deal so to speak. According to the text Allen built a good relationship with the engineers and the decision makers at the plant. He also contacted Magna and got the specifications for the shearing line, which was good move so they can tailor a custom system to better fit the shearling line. However, could’ve used that contact at Magna and involved them more in the process. Perhaps build and alliance with them and have them declare Lawford as a preferred partner.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays