Bibliography: • Canada, Environment. "Energy and The Canadian Economy." Economic Scan of Canada’s Energy Sector 1 (2008): 22.Environment Canada. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. Edmonton Sun. "B.C. 's environmentalists are cool to the Northern Gateway, but the province 's gas and mineral industries are booming." Edmonton Sun. N.p., 28 Sept. 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. . "Enbridge defends ad campaign on pipeline safety - Calgary - CBC News."CBC.ca - Canadian News Sports Entertainment Kids Docs Radio TV. N.p., 9 Aug. 2012. Web. 20 Oct. 2012. . Enbridge. "Benefits for Canadians - Northern Gateway." Enbridge Northern Gateway Project - Northern Gateway. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. . Ipsos. "Views on Canadian Oil and Gas."Ipsos North America. N.p., 3 May 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. . Lee, Marc . "The Economic Cost and Benefits of the Proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline." Enbridge Pipe Dream and Nightmares 1 (2012): 26.www.policyalternatives.ca. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. Mallinder, Lorraine. "Viewpoint: Canada 's green image tarnished by new policies." BBC News. N.p., 15 May 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. .…
ANALYSIS: The meeting was an information session for residents living in Mahwah, Allendale, Oakland, and Ridgefield to understand the history and current status of the Municipal Pipeline Group (MPG). The Municipal Pipeline Group was started by Mahwah Council members after town residents raised awareness of the Pilgrim Pipeline Project. After drafting and approving both a resolution and ordinance, town officials in Mahwah decided to contact neighboring towns and cities who would also be impacted by Pilgrim Pipeline. In order to fight a potential legal battle, the Municipal Pipeline Group was created with each town/city contributing $5,000.…
This week for PLN I read Dakota Access Pipeline: What's at stake? by Holly Yang. Why this topic is blowing up is because where Native American tribes live the government approved a pipeline to be built and where the pipeline is going to be constructed invades the native American's land. Some background of the Dakota Pipeline is it is a 1,172-mile pipeline would stretch from the oil-rich Bakken Formation to the southeast into South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois. The Army Corps of Engineers approved the project then Standing Rock Sioux tribe sued the Corps because it would threaten the tribe environmentally and economically. Some people are arguing that they need the pipeline because it will be an economic boom but on the other hand, people are…
Hundreds of tribes and supporters from all over the country, have gathered to join the Standing Sioux in their fight to raise awareness and permanently stop construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. While Energy Transfer Partners grow impatient, the Army Corps continue to do discuss the full environmental effects. Since the Corps was accused of violating several federal statutes by environmental specialists, the final decision will be weighed carefully. Construction has been halted momentarily, but the pipeline awaits the final easement, allowing workers to begin drilling under Lake Oahe. This will result in the completion of the pipeline by the end of 2016. Resulting in a severe violation of native rights the tribe is entitled to. The Sioux tribe will not only face cultural devastation, but the constant risk of losing their only water source. Yet protests show no sign of losing momentum, and the tribe strongly hope for a stop to the 'Black Snake; running through the land, threatening to poison its'…
The Keystone Pipeline has been in news for several months and has been the subject of scrutiny, political bantering and environmentalist activism. Keystone Pipeline is a transcontinental synthetic oil project that runs from Canada to the Gulf Coast. Construction of such a pipeline bears many risk associated with ecosystem disruption and environmental hazards. President Obama blocked the pipeline’s extension noting several studies that the pipeline would have adverse impact on air and water supplies.…
Nebraska has more groundwater than any other state. The Ogallala Aquifer underlies about 174,000 miles of the High Plains. In some places it can get up to 1,000 feet deep. It spans across eight states, including South Dakota, Nebraska, New Mexico, Wyoming, Colorado, Oklahoma and Texas. It is being pumped by close to 200,000 irrigation wells. This water is so important to American Agriculture. It helps hydrate America, so think what would happen if it were to run out?…
A key stakeholder against the construction of this pipeline is the BC Environmental Network who has substantial claims that the environmental risks involved will negatively impact the local community. These significant risks involve major threats to wild life and the growing health concerns of communities living around the pipeline.…
"What You Need to Know About the Dakota Access Pipeline Protest | Breaking News & Views for the Progressive Community." Common Dreams, www.commondreams.org /views/2016/09/09/what-you-need-know-about-dakota-access-pipeline-protest. Gail Ablow shares what is happening among the Sioux and the Dakota access pipeline with her personal analysis, to inform individuals what they should know about the event. She clarifies the threats and dangers that the Dakota Access Pipeline can bring to the Sioux Native Indian tribe. Also, the protest between the two and how it’s affecting the state of North Dakota. She also explains about the Dakota Access pipeline and the intentions of it being put in place. She goes into various details about how the pipeline…
There should never have been a problem with the Dakota Access Pipeline, and it should be built. The pipeline has many benefits, and few, if any, actual problems. Nodaplsolidarity.org, a site dedicated to opposing and protesting the pipeline, avoids the issue of what the problems with it actually are, saying that the pipeline is a violation of the United Nation’s Declaration of Universal Human Rights, and a violation of the United Nation’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, without actually naming what it is about the pipeline that violates these declarations. Since there appear to be no actual issues violated (and they are declarations of the United Nations, not the United States) these problems can be dismissed, leaving us with…
The Alaskan National Wilderness Refuge has been the topic of political debate for decades. A large, beautiful piece of the world, ANWR as it is often referred to, is not a only a refuge for hundreds of species of birds, fish and mammals, but also a political battleground that is used to ignite the debate on America’s dependence on foreign fuel sources. The possibility of drilling for oil in ANWR brings with it the promise of jobs, dependency from unstable countries for our fuel needs and a boost to our declining economy. However, drilling in this land also brings the possibility of destroying the habitat of birds that migrate to this area yearly, caribou that use this haven as a calving ground, fish that fill the rivers and lakes, as well as grizzly bears, wolves, elk and hundreds of other species that depend on this habitat for food, shelter and safety. There is no debate that there are passionate debates, important facts and amazing possibilities that concern both sides of this argument. And even if it were possible to remove political agenda from the table, it would still be a very difficult debate to win for either side. My hopes are to come to a conclusion that would benefit both parties involved. I strongly feel that any drilling in this area would be detrimental to the surrounding area, as well as bring possible harm to the countless animals, birds and fish that use this safe haven yearly for migration, calving and egg laying and feeding. The decision to either drill or not to drill may not have a direct impact on us now, but in the years to come, good or bad, we will all see the changes that this decision will have resulted in.…
There are many issues in my community that affect the citizens. One issue of my local community that affects the citizens is the administration of roads and highways. A current issue for my township is the PennEast Pipeline. The PennEast Pipeline is a 118-mile underground pipeline that will stretch from Luzerne County, Pa., to Mercer County, N.J., is proposed to go through Upper Nazareth. This pipeline is expected to affect six miles of township roads in my community and neighboring communities. My local community will be voting on whether or not to allow the creation of this pipeline. I chose this issue because it will have a major impact on the area in which I live.…
Tap water isn’t supposed to catch fire. It does in Dimock. Josh Fox, the director of "Gasland," chronicles his search to discover what gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale might do to his beloved Delaware River watershed should he and his neighbors sign the leases they received in the mail. That search takes him first to Dimock and then across the United States, where he meets people struggling with unexpected consequences of gas drilling in multiple states. He spent time with citizens in their homes and on their land as they relayed their stories of natural gas drilling in Colorado, Wyoming, Utah and Texas, among others. He spoke with residents who have experienced a variety of chronic health problems directly traceable to contamination of their air, of their water wells or of surface water.…
What would you do if the government denied your rights, threatened to harm your land, and threatened your primary source of water? Would you let them get away with it, or would you fight for what is right? The Dakota Access Pipeline is said to be “the safest and most environmentally sensitive way to transport crude oil from domestic wells to American consumers” (Dakota Access Pipeline Facts). It’s a pipeline that was built under Lake Oahe, which is located upstream of the Sioux tribes’ land. It would also would save a lot of money and energy to transfer oil across the nation. The Dakota Access Pipeline should have been stopped because the Sioux tribes have rights, the pipeline could damage the environment, and the government needs to care…
The current controversy that exists within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is based on how well they can react and respond to a crisis. Using examples such as Flint, Michigan’s lead introduction into the drinking water system, the EPA is put to the test on not only how well they can contain the situation, but also how they respond and react to the situation at hand. This article was written by Rebecca Leber, a political news editor, where she focused on climate and environmental policies. Leber is a liberal political journalist based out of Washington DC, who has been featured in The Guardian, Wired, and Huffington Post. In this article, her primary argument is based around the fact that the Environmental Protection Agency did not…
First, congress has unsuccessfully tried to regulate fracking by passing the Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act in 2009, 2011, and again in 2013. Second, oil and gas industry leaders continue hampering regulations and oversight by spending more than $747 million in the last 10 years on lobbying and political campaign efforts (Browning and Kaplan). Third, the incomprehensible fact is that hydraulic fracturing continues operations without restriction while the U.S. Geological Survey concluding that earthquakes near Youngstown, Ohio were manmade, when evidence shows no manmade activity in the area except fracking (Bambrick 2) and a recommendation by Environmental Commissioner Joe Martin to ban fracking due to unresolved health issues (Esch). Fourth, a Boston College review about communities in the dark reveals rural property owners are approached by companies offering huge royalties for land rights promising safe practices and stating that no harm will come to them; however, when numerous reports of illness occur these large entities hide the chemicals they use by citing trade secret laws; meanwhile, the near-poverty-level individuals lack the finances to fight back (Fisher 100). Consequently, even those who have damning evidence tend to settle out of court, leaving no help for others suffering, because litigation is sealed or accompanied by a statement of confidentiality. If Sunshine Law mentality applied to private litigation, transformation of inept practices would progress more rapidly, including standards and policies for safe drilling, safe waste disposal, safe storage of fracking chemicals, and requirements for well…