Preview

Beef Cows: The Importance Of Deforestation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
775 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Beef Cows: The Importance Of Deforestation
There are many misconceptions regarding deforestation and pollution. Beef cattle are often the last that comes to your mind.

Water/food - beef cows use 1000 gallons of water are used to make 1 gallon of milk.
2500 gallons of water are used to produce 1 LB of beef. 77 gallons of water are needed to produce lb of eggs. almost 900 gallons of water are needed to produce 1 lb of cheese. World wide cows drink 45 billion gallons of water per day. Animal agriculture consumes 34-76 trillion gallons of water annually.At 50 degrees a cow many consume 5-7 gallons of water if it was 95 degrees they would drink up to 24 gallons of water. an average quality hay is 24 pounds per head and the hay that they are consuming is 88% dry matter. 1,200 pound cows consume 27 pounds per head per day on an as-fed basis. growing feed crops for livestock consumes 46% of water in the US grass fed is more demanding on the land than grain feed it has more impact on the environment because it takes eight more months for it to be ready to be slaughtered that's more waste and water. It only takes 15 months for grain and 22 month for grass because with grain they get fat faster. the government kills other animals for more land. (wild horses are caught elephants were killed. ) cattle alone eat 45 billions gallons of
…show more content…
it takes 4500 acres to produce 80,000 pounds of meat the average american eats 209 pounds of meat per year. if that was all grass fed beef only 382 people could eat that meat. 11.7 acres per person times 314 mil acres in usa which adds up to 3.7 billion acres to raise enough grass for that year and this is only grass fed beef. we would need 3.9 billion acres unfortunately there are only 1.9 billion acres in the us it would take 3 times the amount. so grass fed beef is not sustainable. there is no way to we could use grass feed all the time. We just don't have enough land to use. even if we did we would still be using it all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Lisa Hamilton’s “Unconventional Farmers; Let Them Eat Meat”, she justifies the issue of raising livestock for food causing greenhouse gas emissions. Should we be eating less meat or actually eating more? Hamilton’s research found many interesting points that would interest any human beings that consume meat or any other type of consumable goods.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    THESIS: “Today the most serious environmental harm associated with the cattle industry takes place on the feedlot.” (70).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Only Way to Have a Cow" by Bill McKibben tries to inform humans to decrease the intake of meat eating and how this habit could harm our environment. Cow would release harmful substance like methane when they fart or belch. These actions could actually lead to a bigger problem, global warming. Turning into vegans could make environment more friendly. Eating grass fed cows are more healthy that eating corn fed cows. However another problem forms, grass fed cows are more expensive then corn fed grass which causes people with low incomes couldn't afford to eat…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Merriam-Webster, a feedlot is defined as a plot of land on which livestock are fattened for market. Feedlots have vastly taken over America in the past few years. “Almost all beef found in grocery stores come from cattle fattened up in large grain feeding operations” (Robbins video). John Robbins describes these feedlots in the film clip Diet for a New America (meat consumption). The point of this essay is to explore the negative and positive arguments made by John Robbins in the film clip Diet for a New America (meat consumption). Throughout the video it describes how bad feedlots are. They are unsanitary, overcrowded, and inhumane. They are also contaminating the nearby water sources. Manure is going into the ground contaminating the water in ways that can be destructive. Fertilizer is also getting into the water as well.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill Mckibben, author and environmentalist, explains why being a vegetarian is beneficial for the environment in the article "The Only Way to Have a Cow." He argues that the manufacturing of corn and beef releases harmful gasses into the atmosphere. Eating less meat would decrease the amount of those gasses and improve the environment. I believe there is some truth to what McKibben is saying but his tone is slightly like that of someone who is or thinks they are superior.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Annotated Biblography

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Commentary: The article by Marye, helps identify that these cows are herbivores. The author doesn’t mention anything that has to do with non-grass fed cattle. Everything she says is totally natural for the cows and pure healthy for them and us.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Welcome To Lagos Ethos

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not only is it a source of food it is also stripped and sold for all its parts. Besides the hair which gets thrown away, no other part of the cow goes to waste. The first thing sold is the digestive system. Secondly, hoo’s get sold to shoemakers. Horns get turned into plastic for television stands.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People often buy small ranches only to discover that all of their free time is now devoted…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Agriculture Satire

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal agriculture is ruining our planet. Scientists say that animal agriculture is responsible for more than 18 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions, which is more than the combined exhaust gases from all transportation in the world. Therefore, this means that riding your bike, walking or taking the bus will not help if you want to be kind to our earth. Although I do understand that some people might enjoy eating meat and that they might not feel complete without it the consequences of it has no mercy.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Animals/Peeta

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Secondly, if we aren’t buying and raising the livestock where would they be? Is keeping an animal in a closed environment with plenty (if not more) food and water…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even though one of the main reasons for having pollution in our atmosphere is carbon dioxide emissions, studies have shown that there are many other culprits. One of these many culprits is the production of meats as well as maintaining the livestock itself. Scientists found out recently that “raising animals for food generates more greenhouse gases than all the cars and trucks in the world combined” (Top 10 Reasons Why It's Green to Go Veggie). Livestock also contributes to global climate change due to the fact that they cause the destruction of the land and the pollution of water…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    People have to water the animal clean the stall give it space to roam and people have to feed it. Over one point three billion tons of are consumed by farm animals(walsh). In poverty stricken areas cows eat up to ten times the feed of richer areas(walsh) which takes even more land. Two thirds of all farmland is being used to feed livestock(brooks). Which to give people an idea is forty percent of the world’s land surface(walsh). Not to mention the the deforestation that goes on from the country the food is from(brooks). Not to mention that meat production is projected to double by two thousand and twenty(brooks). Live stock is estimated to use thirty percent of land space(matthews). Almost thirty three percent of arable land is used for livestock feed(matthews). On top of that twenty percent of pastures are considered lessened because of overgrazing(matthews). Animal agriculture also creates ocean dead zones(brooks). Animal agriculture overall is a bad thing because of land useage. Plus there are not enough people with animal agriculture degrees to put in good environmental legislature(grandin). In animal agriculture the government does very little practical research(grandin). So even though it’s estimated that eighty percent of tax revenue comes from exported grain(grandin) which is one of the main ingredients in animal feed. So even though that it provides that much tax revenue. It is not worth it. Our…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The California Drought

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    indicated that cows drink up to 23 gallons of water a day when humans drink up to only 4…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Naked Economics Chapter 4

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cattle is land intensive in other countries too if the ratio of land to labor in cattle production exceeds the ratio in wheat production in that country. A comparison between another country and the United States is not relevant.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays