Preview

Belgian Imperialism: King Leopold

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1138 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Belgian Imperialism: King Leopold
In the mid 1800’s Europe was an extremely powerful force who were trying to extend their empire by taking over profitable land. As European imperialism spread the available land became minimal, except for the mostly unexplored African continent. Belgian Imperialism was driven by ambitions, nationalist pride, and most importantly discovering vast new economic resources. Most of the unclaimed territories had been taken over by other European Countries so the only other option was to head into the vastly unexplored continent of Africa. The man who would be come to be called King Leopold was the one who started that exploration that would forever change the economy of the Republic of Congo (page 10). Leopold was excited about the opportunity to …show more content…
In the years that followed Stanley would work the native people endlessly in an attempt to build up a transportation system for the natural resources being harvested. He would go on to build several stops along the Congo River that could be used as different trading poss as well as a road that would later evolve into a railroad line. Unfortunately the workers were in a very different class than the European explorers, they were forced into the labor, and even those who chose that line of work were shamed and forced into chains making it clear that they were lesser of importance or value than the explorers. Since slave hunters had constantly been raiding villages in the past, the tribes were too weak to try and resist and here was not centralized government or military to stop the intrusions. (page 39) Although these ports were able to transport goods and brought lots of profit to the Leopold, the local people of the Congo never saw a penny of the money they worked …show more content…
I believe that the key to stimulating the economy was his ability to enforce his reign. Without the military Leopold put together there would be no one to force the laborers to harvest the rubber vines or work in the mines. As Adam Horchild said in his book ‘King Leopolds Ghost’ “A village which refused to provide rubber would be completely swept clean. As a young man, I saw soldier Molili, then guarding the village of Boyeka, take a big net, put ten arrested natives in it, attach big stones to the net, and make it tumble into the river.... Rubber caused these torments; that's why we no longer want to hear its name spoken. Soldiers made young men kill or rape their own mothers and sisters.” (page 166) The native people lived in complete fear of the military and their brutality. With all the money Leopold was making on exports he was able to import even more guns, such as the rifles that made the brutal control so much more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adam Hochschild's "King Leopold's Ghost" is a lost historical account starting in the late 19th century continuing into the 20th century of the enslavement of an entire country. The book tells the story of King Leopold and his selfish attempt to essentially make Belgium bigger starting with the Congo. This was all done under an elaborate "philanthropic" public relations curtain deceiving many countries along with the United States (the first to sign on in Leopold's claim of the Congo). There were many characters in the book ones that aided in the enslavement of the Congo and others that help bring light to the situation but the most important ones I thought were: King Leopold, a cold calculating, selfish leader, as a child he was crazy about geography and as an adult wasn't satisfied with his small kingdom of Belgium setting his sites on the Congo to expand. Hochschild compares Leopold to a director in a play he even says how brilliant he is in orchestrating the capture of the Congo. Another important character is King Leopold's, as Hochschild puts it, "Stagehand" Henry Morton Stanley. He was a surprisingly cruel person killing many natives of the Congo in his sophomore voyage through the interior of Africa (The first was to find Livingston). Leopold used Stanley to discuss treaties with African leaders granting Leopold control over the Congo. Some of the natives he talked to weren't even in the position to sign the treaties or they didn't know what they were signing. And probably the most influential person in the book, E.D. Morel. Morel, an employee of a Belgian company that handled shipments to the Congo, noticed that the shipments coming to and from the Congo seemed really suspicious.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1876, King Leopold II of Belgium began plans for international benevolent committees for the people of the Congo region. Though originally accepted as multi-national, scientific, and humanitarian propositions, they have of late become anything but. Soon after their conception, Leopold used these organizations to establish a sphere of influence and eventually Belgian sovereignty in the Congo Basin. The region is rich in ivory and rubber, and Leopold made use of those resources and others in expanding trade. Now, rubber is the colony's most profitable industry. However, the Congolese people benefit little from this.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A little more than a quarter of a century ago, a great genius for evil, having achieved in rapid succession a series of diplomatic master strokes, stretched out to reach the scepter which was to give him power over life and death of over 20 million human beings.” This great genius for evil, King Leopold II, was commonly known for the atrocities he committed in the Congo Free State. Leopold’s ability to gain control over the lives of the Congolese was due to the deceit and use of persuasion over head powers for a lucrative business. Specifically, in the Congo Free State, King Leopold II’s approach to governing, in an effort to gain the most profit, lead to violent atrocities and the deaths of many natives.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the world approached the 20th century European countries were in a race against each other. This lead to the trans-Atlantic slave trade however, when the British outlawed the trans-Atlantic slave trade and than slavery outright they turned to imperialism. The European countries endeavours toward the exploration of Africa were failing as they lost their lives in extraordinary numbers to malaria. However in the early 1880’s King Leopold of Belgium acquired a private “country” in Central Africa; he called this private “country” Congo Free State. This private country was 95 times larger than Belgium and he intended to utilize it to earn money.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    colony of Belgium; trading stations established in 1879, and Leopold II was given control of the Congo; the Belgian rulers savagely treated the indigenous peoples in their quest for rubber and ivory; Leopold's incursion into Congo basin raised the question of the political fate of black Africa (south of the Sahara); as did Britain's conquest of Egypt…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “strong humanitarian veneer” (Hochschild 42) that Leopold used as the false justification for the harsh methods employed to control the Congo. This veneer contained a myriad of reasons that gave Leopold, and other Europeans the ability to move freely throughout the undeveloped world, destroying the land and its people along their way with limited resistance.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout his reign as the King of the Belgians, Leopold II both followed and went against some of the ideas Niccolo Machiavelli lists in “The Prince”. One of the first things Leopold II did when he came into power in 1865 was pulling Belgium into neutrality in Europe due to recent shifts in the European balance of power. This goes against what Niccolo Machiavelli says in “The Prince” about what a prince must do to be esteemed. “A prince can also win prestige by declaring himself an ally of one side of a conflict. Neutrality alienates both the victor and the loser” (Machiavelli). He tells us in this quote that a prince should choose a side when making allies instead of staying neutral. He claims that the victor will see the nation as a “doubtful friend” while the loser will see them as a coward. Since Belgium was seen as a powerless country in Europe at the time, it probably would have been wise of him to choose a side with either France or Germany since they bordered Belgium and could have taken over at any time. In an instance where Leopold II did follow Machiavelli’s ideas, he lied in the Brussel’s Conference in 1876 by saying that by expanding into the Congo Free State, he was only “promoting scientific exploration of Africa for the advancement of knowledge and for the economic benefit of all humanity” (Blumberg, 161). Machiavelli states that “a prince who honors his word is generally praised by others”, but at the same time, he should be a master of deception by learning “how to fight both with laws and with force” (Machiavelli). Therefore, the best of all princes is one that keeps his promises, but knows when it’s the right time to lie. In this case, Leopold lied at the conference so that he could receive the Congo for his own benefit. Since Belgium was a Constitutional Monarchy in which the king had very little power over domestic affairs, he really didn't do much that would have affected the lives of his people directly. Therefore, by getting the Congo to…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ,geographers at the royal palace in Brussels (1876). Several years later he hired Henry Morton Stanley to be his right-hand man in Africa. For half a decade, Stanley traveled the Congo setting up posts, building roads, and persuading chiefs─practically all being illiterate─to sign treaties with Leopold. The treaties, some of which doctored to Leopold’s benefit, were then put to use by the Belgian monarch (Britannica). Rubber was booming during that time, and the Congo free estate had one lucrative source of wild rubber, and it was the Landolphia vines in the Central African rainforest.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Supporting Evidence #1: “However, he licensed companies that brutally exploited Africans by forcing them to collect sap from rubber plants. At least 10 million Congolese died due to the abuses inflicted during Leopold's rule.”World history: Patterns of interactions. (2009). p#774…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Belgian Congo Imperialism

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In some ways Imperialism made the life of the native people better by building and maintaining new infrastructure that the natives didn’t have before. With the new infrastructure the natives were able to lead longer and happier lives with more amenities provided by things like libraries and hospitals.In India the railroad system put in place by the British is still running and useful today as are many of the roads and hospitals. These services and India’s huge population has led to India being one of the premier economies in the world today. However in the Belgian Congo these improvements were more temporary with very few being serviceable today, and even the ones that are serviceable do not offer much of a service to the natives because of the enormous limits on where they can go and what they can do. This is…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Congo Free State, later named the Democratic Republic of Congo, drastically changed in 1876 when it was first colonized by King Leopold of Belgium. The colony of the Congo Free State was ruled solely by King Leopold, who used it for his own personal advancement. He took advantage of the country's well-known sources such as rubber. King Leopold of Belgium took all profits made off of the resources for himself and left the native people with nothing. In addition, King Leopold enslaved these natives and treated them poorly. They were forced to do hard and dangerous labor and if they did not meet the King’s standards, they could be killed. While the inhabitants of the Congo Free State could not do much to retaliate against the King, other countries…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Belgium saw them as an easy target with big profits and imperialized. Belgium, as a western nation, also agreed to the ideas of Social Darwinism, the belief that the white European was better than the rest of the people in the world, chiefly based on their physical features. Simply put, they were racist. Most Europeans fell into this belief, but the Belgian people took this to an extreme. They enslaved the native people of Congo in their own country and forced work upon them. Quotas and taxes were created to ensure certain amounts of raw materials were gathered and harsh punishments were put into action for those who didn’t complete or meet their requirements. According to Mark Twain, “The amount of rubber needed to meet the tax requires the men to work for up 25 days each month harvesting the wild rubber vines in the Congo forest” [3]. According to this that would leave only 5 days a month for “regular” life for the Congolese people. They did not have the time or resources to educate themselves, make money, or to develop. In 1908 the Belgian government gave the natives better treatment, by taking away the direct ownership of the nation from Leopold and they made it an official colony of the Belgian government [4]. This decision came through by putting humanitarian pressure put on King Leopold. Conditions improved, schools, hospitals, and roads were built, but the cruelty and racism was still their because of the history they had of it. Also, the punishment, crimes, and cruelty was all that the people understood because they were forced to live in it their entire lives, and it was a hard to shift back. Even in today’s world, this industrialization and these policies have left a scar on the Congos. In both the Republic of Congo and the Democratic Republic Of Congo there is still political unrest and constant violence. On December 17, there were 22…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism is the ideology that drives the Europeans in the “Heart of Darkness” towards the Congo for its ivory. In the Congo, the only things worth paying attention towards are those that provide monetary benefits, and this can be seen when Conrad states “Some, I heard, got drowned in the surf; but whether they did or not, nobody seemed particularly to care.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When a famous missionary and explorer by the name of Dr. David Livingstone vanished in the Congo Basin, he led a mission to find him. After Stanley's successful exploration of central Africa, king of the Belgians, Leopold II, wanted Stanley to carry out expeditions for him. Leopold was looking to establish a domain in Africa, and that is just what he did. Before long, the African territory held by Belgium had become infamous for the ghastly treatment of the native population. In King Leopold's Public Letter, the king writes to missionaries working for him in the Congo.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Whether it was for tires or waterproofing clothes, all Leopold knew was that there was a demand, and Leopold could provide it. Unlike other African and Asian countries that were attempting to catch up with the rubber boom, the Congo already had matured rubber trees, so Leopold wanted to stay ahead of the game while he still could (Hochschild 159). While in the past workers could be chained together and whipped to make them obey, rubber trees were scattered across the forest and vines were located in spots that required careful scaling of trees, so a new strategy had to be used (Hochschild 160). Making rubber was a difficult, painful process involving travelling deep into the forest in a desperate search for vines, cutting them open and waiting for the vines to tap, and then spreading the rubber syrup across one’s body to make the rubber dry; and the Congolese eventually realized this long, difficult process really wasn’t worth their effort. Europeans disagreed, knowing the potential profit, and established a forced labor system in the Congo (Hochschild 161). European soldiers would arrive in a village and then take the wives and children of the villages as hostage, refusing to give them back until the men met a rubber quota. Once enough rubber was collected to satisfy them, the soldiers would sell the women back for a few goats or other small…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays