Out of those reason there were some European nations that believed would gain a political advantage by taking territories in Africa. Prince Leopold, future king of Belgium, during a conversation…
The 19th century was one of the most important time periods that helped shape the world into what it is today. Western European powers, such as Great Britain, Germany, and France, strongly believed in the notion that in order to gain more dominant global power, they would have to conquer new lands across the globe and exploit the territories’ resources. Throughout the early and mid 1800s, the nations of Western Europe upheld imperialism, conquering and exploiting foreign lands in Asia and South America. Unfortunately, one major problem remained in the way of global imperialism; Africa, a continent rich in resources, could not be infiltrated because of strong resistance by the natives, foreign disease, and difficult terrain. Nevertheless, in the 1880s, Western Europe became more advanced and had the capability of conquering Africa; the scramble for Africa was on. In 1884-85, the Berlin Conference was held in Germany; this was a diplomatic meeting where the nations of Western Europe divided Africa among themselves. Each nation was given separate holdings in Africa, and the issue of land in Africa was solved. However, a major problem overlooked by the Europeans was that Africa had no say in the Berlin Conference. This resulted in many problems that would terrorize Africa for years to come; because Africans had no say in the dividing of their land, religious and political strife arose, and places such as the Congo faced detrimental and uninvited changes.…
“A little more than a quarter of a century ago, a great genius for evil, having achieved in rapid succession a series of diplomatic master strokes, stretched out to reach the scepter which was to give him power over life and death of over 20 million human beings.” This great genius for evil, King Leopold II, was commonly known for the atrocities he committed in the Congo Free State. Leopold’s ability to gain control over the lives of the Congolese was due to the deceit and use of persuasion over head powers for a lucrative business. Specifically, in the Congo Free State, King Leopold II’s approach to governing, in an effort to gain the most profit, lead to violent atrocities and the deaths of many natives.…
colony of Belgium; trading stations established in 1879, and Leopold II was given control of the Congo; the Belgian rulers savagely treated the indigenous peoples in their quest for rubber and ivory; Leopold's incursion into Congo basin raised the question of the political fate of black Africa (south of the Sahara); as did Britain's conquest of Egypt…
Before the 1800s European nations had barely touched Africa, but when they learned about Africa’s raw materials they raced to gain a piece of the continent. In the beginning European nations just traded with Africa at coastal ports. Then they began exploring more of the continent. Belgium conquered the Congo. Britain took control of Egypt, what is now South Africa, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, and parts of eastern Africa.…
The intention of colonialism, though cloaked with moral justification, was clear from the beginning: in order to assert oneself as a dominant power, a country must steal, ravish and exploit the land, people and culture belonging to another. The belief that taking of foreign land was justified because a particular country had the power to do so with little genuine resistance was so prevalent during the late Nineteenth, early Twentieth centuries that it significantly, and tragically affected those colonized land. In Adam Hochschild’s novel, King Leopold’s Ghost, he details chronicles that events that shaped King Leopold of Belgium’s rule over the Congo in Africa, but also illustrates that what went on was not aberrant. Rather, it was example of a broader problem that plagued many Europeans countries in the decades leading up to World War One that led to the death of millions.…
Nicholas Defreitas Professor Herman WHO 1030 10/20/15 King Leopold and the Congo Takeover In the 1800’s, European countries all scrambled for African territory. The first to put his foot down in the territory however would be King Leopold ll. “I do not want to miss us getting a slice of this magnificent African cake” said Leopold to a London ambassador shortly before his invasion of Africa.…
Between 1880 and 1914, Africa was a great place to acquire colonies if necessary. Almost everyone in Europe was very supportive of this movement. Prince Leopold of Belgium was for this movement because he said that colonies are very useful in that they help the mother country gain wealth, natural resources, and power. (Doc. 1) He also believes that it is a great way to prove to everyone that Belgians are imperial people capable of dominating and enlightening others. Since Prince Leopold was heir to the Belgium throne, he wanted to make sure that his country had the most money and power it could get. Another European who loved the acquisition of African Colonies was Joseph Chamberlain. (Doc. 4) He believed that without the use of colonies, a country couldn’t survive. He believes that the mother country is highly dependent on its colonies raw materials and natural resources and without them half the population would starve. Another proponent to the acquisition of Africa was George Washington Williams of Belgium. (Doc. 6) He believes that not only is it good that they are acquiring land and wealth, but it is very easy to do so.…
Between the late 17th century and early 18th century, almost all of Africa was under European rule. This was in great contrast to 1880, when close to none of Africa was under direct rule of the continents. This stark change in power was due to the interest in raw materials, new trade opportunities, political gain over other countries, and Europeans feeling the need to spread Christianity, democracy, and capitalism. (Spielvogel and McTighe 230-233). Although European imperialism helped to "civilize" the people of Africa and develop the continent, this justification is far outweighed by the facts that Africans were treated with immense oppression and a disregard for their culture. After imperialism, African nations were better able to prosper…
During the 1800’s, seven European nations were taking land from Africa for themselves without the consent of the Africans. This is known as Imperialism; imperialism is an action by a strong nation to take control of another country. In this case Europe was the strong nation, and it was taking control of Africa. Many asked themselves why the Europeans were engaging in Imperialism. The European nations were engaging in imperialism for political factors and cultural causes because they wanted to gain power and spread their culture. However, the primary cause for engaging in imperialism was economic. European nations competed against one another to exploit Africa’s natural resources for financial gain.…
The Congo Free State, later named the Democratic Republic of Congo, drastically changed in 1876 when it was first colonized by King Leopold of Belgium. The colony of the Congo Free State was ruled solely by King Leopold, who used it for his own personal advancement. He took advantage of the country's well-known sources such as rubber. King Leopold of Belgium took all profits made off of the resources for himself and left the native people with nothing. In addition, King Leopold enslaved these natives and treated them poorly. They were forced to do hard and dangerous labor and if they did not meet the King’s standards, they could be killed. While the inhabitants of the Congo Free State could not do much to retaliate against the King, other countries…
Economic motives created by the Industrial Revolution played the most important role in Imperialism in Africa in the 19th Century. One very important economic motivator was the need for resources for production. As Africa had been barely touched by Europeans, there were many opportunities for finding…
As a result, the Congolese people were very slow to trust those of non Congolese descent. Needless to say, native peoples were very poor, tired, and unhappy. They weren’t gaining much from working for King Leopold, and they lived in a constant state of exhaustion from working long days. Along with being physically injured, they were psychologically beaten down. Families were being torn apart and constantly surrounded by violence.…
After World War II, the people of Africa fought to end the effects of European imperialism in order to achieve political independence and reclaim African culture. However, tensions caused by artificial political boundaries established by European powers exacerbated preexisting tribal and religious divisions. The newly ‘freed’ African states were unstable and struggled to deal with these conflicts, often resulting in civil wars and genocide. During this struggle, Africa received very little support to help develop African economies or governments from the very countries who caused Africa’s weak infrastructure. 19th-century European imperialism was a major factor in causing the political weakness within African states, but the fact that the solution…
Throughout history, nations have tried to ‘compete’ with each other in almost every respect, trying to become the biggest world power. One way to do this is by developing colonies: this increases land supply as well as the abundance of resources, thus improving the economy. Africa was a generally underdeveloped continent with weak, decentralized political structures that could be easily conquered by western militaries, who wanted to colonize there to use the raw materials and human labor to improve their economy. While Belgians who were imperializing the Congo in the 19th century believed and justified their actions by saying they were helping the conquered peoples to advance and “catch up” to the West technologically and culturally, in reality…