Bex And Walton: Preponderance Of Evidence

Based on the facts above, Bex and Walton believe that the totality of the evidence would show that there was a preponderance of evidence tending to show that defendant was indeed negligent, for at least two reasons: 1) the burden of evidence ended with defendant, who failed to satisfy it; and 2) the greater weight of testimonies and object evidence supports the explanation provided by the plaintiff. Judging by preponderance of evidence, the defendant would be found liable. If it were judged by clear and convincing evidence, however, the plaintiff would not have won, despite these two reasons. This is because the only thin advantage that the plaintiff had over the defendant was a challenge to the latter’s last evidence given, after which the