Preview

Kennedy V. State, 323 S.E.2d 169 (Ga. App. 1984)

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kennedy V. State, 323 S.E.2d 169 (Ga. App. 1984)
Title: Kennedy v. State, 323 S.E.2d 169 (Ga. App. 1984)

Facts: A fire was evolved on September 23, 1981 in a log cabin due to a hot plate. The hot plate was left on with an accelerant and kerosene near by. The owner of the cabin, Henry Xavier Kennedy was convicted of Arson as he obtained an insurance policy for $40K on the cabin five days prior to this fire and police found evidence that the construction business owned by Mr. Kennedy was losing money, and Mr. Kennedy's alibi was insufficient to eliminate him as a suspect.

Issues: Throughout the trail process on behalf of the court the inquiry for exceptions to the charge inaccuracy developed regarding instructions. The appellant was seeking a claim based of the defense of his alibi.

Decisions:
a. The court did not find any errors in the defense's response to exceptions, as counsel did not state any exceptions when inquired. During this inquiry defense counsel stated, "I don't believe..." which can be interpreted as an attempt to find error in exceptions to charge. Yet Georgia law indicates error cannot be found when induced by the appellant. Regardless, the court found no error in the charge of exception by the trial court.
b. Appellant believes the court hindered his ability to provide a defense based on his alibi that he was not present at the scene of the crime when the fire occurred and that he claimed the fire resulted by way of accidentally leaving a hot plate on. The prosecution proved the appellant conspired to ignite the fire later when he was not present. Prosecution also proved that by pouring the accelerant around the hot plate with the power on, is not indicative of an accident. The defense must prove "impossibility of the accused's presence," for which the court found no basis for error in the original trial.
c. Appellant claims error regarding his defense of accident using the prosecution's wording as a basis for the charge. The trial court indicated the reference of the fire as



References: 172 Ga.App. 336, 323 S.E.2d 169 Justia.com (2013). Larceny-theft. Retrieved from http://www.justia.com/criminal/docs/uniform-crime-reporting-handbook/larceny-theft.html USLegal.com Inc. (2013). Breaking and entering. Retrieved from http://definitions.uslegal.com/b/breaking-and-entering/ USLegal.com Inc. (2013). Burglary. Retrieved from http://definitions.uslegal.com/b/burglary/ USLegal.com Inc. (2013). Home invasion. Retrieved from http://definitions.uslegal.com/h/home-invasion/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the case of White v. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, Mrs. White is suing Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern in the death of her husband, Mr. White. Mr. Edward Hard was a patron of the tavern the night of the accident with Mr. and Mrs. White. Mr. Hard was in a relationship with Mrs. White before she married Mr. White. Mr. Hard saw Mr. and Mrs. White leave the tavern on this night and followed them out the door. Mrs. White observed Mr. Hard drinking several alcoholic beverages while they were there. When Mr. and Mrs. White where leaving Mr. Hard confronted Mr. White telling him that “she should be my wife” and “this is not over.” After Mr. and Mrs. White got in their car and were leaving the establishment, Mr. Hard followed them driving recklessly. He was swerving across the road, driving in the opposite lane, and hitting mailboxes. His recklessness and inability to drive due to being intoxicated resulted in him crashing into Mr. and Mrs. White’s vehicle ultimately killing Mr. White and severely injuring Mrs. White. This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, Jordan Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court decided that plaintiff's complaint states a cognizable cause of action against the defendants for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Accordingly, the defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint is denied.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Issue No. 1: In the appeal you state Lt. J. Ratliff was your hearings officer and that he had prior knowledge regarding details of your offense. Response: Alternate hearings officer Lt. Ratliff would have had knowledge about your offense due to preparations for hearing of this infraction; which would deem this issue irrelevant.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Haugen Vs Ford Summary

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Haugen v. Ford Motor Co., the requirement of Article 2-302(2) that the court required an affording opportunity for the buyer to present evidence to aid the court in making a determination. In this case, Plaintiff buyer challenged the judgment of the District Court of Williams County (North Dakota) that granted summary judg-ment in favor of defendant manufacturer dismissing the buyer's damage claim based on a liability exclusion for damage from fire. The buyer filed a complaint against the man-ufacturer when the car he bought burst into flames while he drove it. The manufacturer was awarded summary judgment dismissing the buyer's claim based on a liability ex-clusion for damage from fire included in the limitation of liability. The court…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. McCleskey was a Black man, that was convicted of two counts armed robbery and one count of murder in the Supreme Court of Fulton County, Georgia. His convictions were due to the robbery of a furniture store and the killing of a white police officer while the robbery was occurring. There was evidence presented at trial that proved one of the bullets to be from a .38 caliber Rossi revolver, which fit the description of the gun McCleskey was carrying, and two witnesses who had heard McCleskey had admitted to the shooting.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    X

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both Duplechin and Allstate contend that the trial court erred: in not finding that Bourque assumed the risk of injury by participating in the softball game; and in failing to find that Bourque was guilty of contributory negligence. Defendant Duplechin also contends that the trial court erred in finding him negligent and in finding that the injury to plaintiff Bourque occurred four to five feet away from the second base position in the general direction of the pitcher's mound. Allstate further contends that the trial court erred in finding coverage under its policy which excludes injury intended or expected by the insured.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justin King Answer

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Answer to Paragraph 2. Defendants do not have sufficient information or belief to enable them to answer said Paragraph and, on that ground, deny each and every allegation contained therein.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yunker V. Honeywell

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    4. The court allowed for the negligent retention issue to go to trial because of some evidence found on the record, which showed a number of…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The firefighters tried to imitate radiologists by coming with the conclusion that the fire started on the floor and that arson was poured in order to excite it. Given the time period, it is understandable that they could find closure so quickly given that arson had just recently been discovered and not much had been known about it. But even that doesn’t excuse how the court refused to take into account Hurst’s testimony that the fire was caused by some other means.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977), held that the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution forbade the death penalty for the crime of rape of a woman. While serving several sentences for rape, kidnapping, one count of first degree murder, and aggravated assault, Ehrlich Anthony Coker escaped from prison. Coker broke into Allen and Elnita Carver's home near Waycross, Georgia, raped Elnita Carver and stole the family's vehicle. Coker was convicted of rape, armed robbery, and the other offenses. He was sentenced to death on the rape charge after the jury found two of the aggravating circumstances present for imposing such a sentence: that the rape was committed by a person with prior convictions for capital felonies, and that the rape was committed in the course of committing another capital felony—the armed robbery. The Supreme Court of Georgia upheld the sentence.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first person to claim not guilty was charged with speeding. I tried to get as many of the details of the case as possible. The facts of the case were as follows: While driving on Bogus Avenue, the defendant was stopped by an Officer and was charged with violating CVC 22350. The charge was driving 40mph in a 25mph zone based on laser evidence. The defendant stated he believed he was driving approximately 35 mph at the time of the stop.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gregg V. Georgia 1976

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Jury found Troy Gregg guilty of committing an armed robbery and murder. In accordance with Georgia law, the trial was in two stages, a guilt stage, and a sentencing stage. At the guilt stage of Georgia's bifurcated procedure, the jury found the petitioner guilty of two accounts armed robbery and murder. At the penalty stage, the judge instructed the jury that it could recommend either a death sentence or a life prison sentence on each count and the jury returned the verdict of death. Challenging his death sentence, Gregg claimed that his capital sentence was "cruel and unusual" punishment, violating the 8th and 14th amendment.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hurst Error Analysis

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Despite the fact that this Court has found the Hurst error harmless in some cases without evidentiary development, this Court has never done so when a defendant has proffered evidence and been denied a hearing. Appellant requested a hearing based on a substantial evidentiary proffer showing the extent of the Hurst error in his case. This proffer cast doubt on what the outcome of his penalty phase would have been without the constitutional error. In light of Appellant’s proffer, the circuit court should have held an evidentiary hearing on harmless error. This Court should remand for such a hearing.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff was standing on a platform of defendant 's railroad after buying a ticket to go to Rockaway Beach. A train stopped at the station, bound for another place. Two men ran forward to catch it. One of the men reached the platform of the car without mishap, though the train was already moving. The other man, carrying a package, jumped aboard the car, but seemed unsteady as if about to fall. A guard on the car, who had held the door open, reached forward to help [*341] him in, and another guard on the platform pushed him from behind. In this act, the package was dislodged, and fell upon the rails. It was a package of small size, about fifteen inches long, and was covered by a newspaper. In fact it contained fireworks, but there was nothing in its appearance to give notice of its contents. The fireworks when they fell exploded. The shock of the explosion threw down some scales at the other end of the platform, many feet away. The scales struck the plaintiff, causing injuries for which she sues.…

    • 2346 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bolton, Jr. of Hampton VA forced his way into a side door and took jewelry and electronics.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays