In the first disaster Zeebrugge, the company would be prosecuted for corporate manslaughter. Although five people had told management there concerns, the board was never made aware of the issues. The incident would never make it to trail. In the second tragedy was the Dorset Canoe incident in which two instructors warned them about the problems with the canoes. In Dorset canoe tragedy there was a conviction of corporate manslaughter and an individual was …show more content…
A school counselor walked in. The school had a chain of command that had to be followed. That protocol did not involve calling the authorities. In fact the chain of command had warned the principle of the counselor’s accusations through an e-mail. They told the principle that there was no need to worry. She realized there would be no consequences for the principle following Tulsa Public Schools investigation. In this case she made an ethical decision to expose the principle to the parents of the child. She had decided to resign her post has she knew she would surely be fired for her insubordination after she called the child’s parent three days after the