Preview

Bonjour's Foundationalism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
894 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bonjour's Foundationalism
In his article "Foundationalism and the External World," Laurence BonJour explains that there are two elements in a situation of basic belief. First, there is a basic belief whose content pertains to some aspect of the experience. Second, there is second independent mental act that must supply the person's reason for thinking that the belief is true. "If second metal act is construed as cognitive and conceptual, then it is hard to see why it does not itself require justification of reason for thinking that the proposition is true" (BonJour 231). On the other hand, "if the mental act of immediate apprehension is construed as non-cognitive and non-conceptual in character, then it becomes difficult to see how such an act can provide reason for …show more content…
By proposing the justification of a meta-belief about an occurrent first order belief as well as beliefs about sensory experience, BonJour argues that the constitutive awareness satisfies the requirement for foundationalism and how its justification works in order to avoid foundationalist dilemma. He extends the idea of this justification to connect the foundation to a physical world. BonJour argues that an occurrent belief is a conscious state on its own and it is an intrinsic and constitutive awareness. For an ultimate source of justification, he argues that an apperceptive meta-belief about an occurrent belief has epistemic status required by foundationalism: it can be justified because it is an internally accessible reason for thinking that it is true without that reason depending on any other beliefs. In parallel to the first point, he also argues that a constitutive awareness of sensory content can justify foundational beliefs. BonJour draws an objection to what was presented by philosopher Davidson who proposed the idea that the distinctive content of a sensory experience is non-propositional and non-conceptual in character. According to Davidson, "there is no intelligible relation of justification …show more content…
He argues that these features of experiences justify an inference to the external physical world. Based on these features of experiences, BonJour concludes that these experiences need to be explained by the three-dimensional physical world, and calls this explanation as the quasi-commonsensical hypothesis. In order to provide the best explanation of the details of our sensory experience, he proceeds to support the quasi-commonsensical hypothesis. He divides the explanations into two categories: analog and digital. Analogue explanation explains the features of experience by appealing directly to the basic features of the objects in the hypothesized world. Digital explanation explains the features of experience by appealing to the combination of the representation of a world and some agent that produces experience in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this paper, I hope to effectively summarize W.K Clifford’s (1879) argument on the ethics of belief, followed by a summary of William James’ (1897) argument on the right to believe, and finally, provide an argument for why W.K Clifford’s (1879) argument is stronger by highlighting its strengths while simultaneously arguing against William James’ (1897) argument.…

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    PHIL 201 Study Guide

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Basing Relation- Specifies how the epistemic merit of our basic beliefs is to be transferred to out non-basic beliefs.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to argue that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence” (as cited on p190). The aim of this essay is to establish whether indeed this view offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is convincing. In order to do this I will consider the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that which to believe anything based upon insufficient evidence always does harm and so is wrong. Such a statement is in direct opposition to those religious believers who regard their blind faith as a virtue and for whom evidence is something that is unnecessary in order to believe. Along with discussing Clifford I will detail the responses given by James who disagreed with Clifford and in response attacked his views within his own paper “The Will to Believe”. James believed instead that it is more important to achieve truth than to avoid error. Both men, in my opinion, offer strong and persuasive arguments however I do not believe that either stands without criticism, therefore throughout I will offer my own views on the foundations of their arguments, which I hope will establish, that although many of Clifford’s points are valid in particular and specific circumstances they do not offer, as proposed, a convincing view of religious faith.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * P. 10 What are the kinds of issues that raise epistemological concerns? HOW WE ACQUIRE OUR BELIEFS, WHAT WE BELIEVE IS TRUE, WHETHER WE BELIEVE RATIONALLY, WHETHER WE OUGHT TO RECONSIDER BELIEFS THAT HAVE BEEN CRITICIZED---HOW TO TREAT CLAIMS PURPOSED FOR OUR ACCEPTANCE, HOW TO HANDLE IDEAS OPPOSITE OF OUR OWN BELIEFS---…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    William K. Clifford sets out to show in “The Ethics of Belief” that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence…” In this paper, I will show that his argument lacks key definitions needed in order to found his inference upon and that it begs the question as to what qualifies as “insufficient” evidence. Furthermore, I will show that the primary issue is not the belief but the results of the belief that is important and that all judgment and interpretation should be based upon said results.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    THEO 201 Final Essay

    • 801 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A foundational belief for all Christians is how we serve a God that loves His children unconditionally and has been approachable and involved in our lives and His creation. Throughout this essay I will approach the theology of creation, explain how God is actively involved throughout it all, and how His doctrine will impact whatever career path I chose to follow after college.…

    • 801 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I believe Jackson’s ‘Knowledge Argument’ is a successful objection to ‘Physicalism’ (the doctrine that the entire world is physical), consequently proving it is false. I am of this view because the argument is successful in establishing the claim: ‘There are truths about consciousness that cannot be deduced from the complete physical truth’. In my view the ‘Knowledge Argument’ as it stands, is without an objection that entails its falsity, as Jackson and other supporters of the argument have been successful in there endeavors to defend the argument against its numerous objections. This paper will briefly discuss how the ‘Knowledge Argument’ (in its most simplistic form) successfully articulates its objection against ‘Physicalism’. The more…

    • 2346 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes' argument that corporeal things exist exemplifies his use of, and basis in epistemological foundationalism. To clearly understand how Descartes argument reflects this, we must first explain what epistemological foundationalism is. In his essay, Epistemology, Richard Feldman explains that foundationalism is when, "The argument is sound. There are basic justified beliefs, and they are the foundation upon which all our other justified beliefs rest" (Feldman 51). He continues this line of thought by saying further, "All justified nonbasic beliefs are justified in virtue of their relation to justified basic beliefs." (Feldman 52). In other words, basic justified beliefs allow…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To achieve this, this chapter will have 3 sections; the first section will be devoted to explaining the mechanisms of how phenomenal content determines intentional content base on the adverbalist view . This view accommodates intentionality in terms of the non-relational intrinsic properties of experience; hence in the framework of the “phenomenal intentionality” program. This will pave the way for the conclusion that “the phenomenal character of intentionality” is the only source of intentionality, this is, original intentionality. This argument will be contrasted in the second section with Kriegel’s views of intentionality. Kriegel praises a ‘tracking account’, a theory of ‘experiential intentionality’, as the only way to naturalize intentionality (Kriegel, 2011, p. 6). This section will establish that this view is a non-starter: and here I will debate that there is no such thing as non-experiential intentionality or derived intentionality in the terms proposed by Kriegel. The third section will set up all objections and replies to the views defended, and conclude with a discussion about whether the phenomenal character of intentionality can be naturalized. This debate will at the same time provide an introduction to the discussion of the next chapter, about how the hard problem of consciousness can be explored from the base of intentionality view developed in this…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument for religious experiences is based on 3 premises. Premise one states that the experience of X indicates the reality of X. One problem with this premise is that the experience of X does not always indicate the reality of X as our experiences can easily be mistaken. Due to this premise one would be better phrased as ‘the experience of X indicates the probably reality of X’.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Final

    • 57372 Words
    • 230 Pages

    Bibliography: Sosa, Ernest [1980]: “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence Versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge.” In Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 5: Studies in Epistemology. Minneapolis MN: University of Minneapolis Press: 3–25. Stace, W.T. [1967]: “Science and the Physical World.” In Man Against Darkness and Other Essays. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Tye, Michael [2009]: “A New Look at the Speckled Hen.” In Analysis 60, April: 258–63. Yolton, John W. [1970]: Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.…

    • 57372 Words
    • 230 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The Ethics of Belief” written by W.K. Clifford. Explains the idea of belief and moral righteousness by coming up with the conclusion that it is morally incorrect to believe in a claim with insufficient evidence or to create a claim without sufficient evidence. Clifford brings about various analogies that prove his claim to be true such as the ship-owner and the religious group on the island. Although these ideas helped set out the theory efficiently, William James essay “The Will to Believe” believes in the opposite by stating that anyone can believe in anything without the sufficient evidence provided for a specific claim. James’s, the essay provides counterexamples to Clifford’s work as well as provides strong examples and positions to help…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tim Crane Perception

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (Crane 2.1) Concerning the first sort of claim, our “ordinary conception of perception [is] that its objects are mind-independent, public objects.” (2.1.1) Clearly in this respect, Strawson's exposition of common-sense realism relates it to Crane's “open to the world” view. In the “strict account” of perceptual experience free from any truth-claims about the external world, he demonstrates that even when not declaring the existence of the objects we take ourselves to perceive, we still cannot help but refer to these objects as if they do exist. Strawson asserts that the “strict account” of perceptual experience should be the same even in the case of illusion. (Strawson 93) Though we consider ourselves to be immediately experiencing objects around us, Strawson maintains that this does not require “that we take ourselves to be immune from illusion, hallucination or mistake.” (100) This point ties into the second of the “open to the world” view's claims, the conviction that the nature of a perceptual experience is a result of its relation to the nature of its object. (Crane 2.1.2) If we directly perceive external objects, it seems problematic for the common-sense view that the “strict account” of our experience would be the same if the experience was illusory, since we ordinarily understand our perceptual experiences to be related to their objects in the right way, or causally. However, Strawson argues that what our perceptual experiences indicate to us about the world around us does not entail that our resulting picture of its character is reliable, only that we take it to be. (Strawson…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Foundations are necessary for all of Jeanette’s beliefs and ideas, both theological and non-theological. Once Jeanette learns that views of her childhood can coexist with ideas based in her experience, she accepts china from individuals with different beliefs so that she learn more about these beliefs. This foundation enables Jeanette to find satisfaction in her life and develop a belief system of her…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sixth Sense Technology

    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages

    information enabling surfaces, walls and physical objects around us to be used as interfaces. 'Sixth Sense' frees information from its confines by seamlessly integrating…

    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics