Chapter I takes on beliefs. Boso challenges faith as Christian simplicity. He seeks from Anselm sufficient truths that gratify. Thus, he seeks faith through the conviction of reason. Boso states, “There never was a time since man was created when there has not been some one gaining that reconciliation without which every man was made in vain. So that we rest upon this as not only proper but necessary” (page 48). Boso’s argument of man uses the faculty of the mind; he and others can logically come to rational conclusions …show more content…
For you will sooner convince me that deeper reason is concealed.” Anselm responds, “I see I cannot escape your importunity, but I have any power to explain what you wish, let us thank God for it” (page 40). Analysis suggests from this exchange that it is at this point there exists a proper dialogue between issues of faith as truth not requiring evidence and the rationale for a natural or logical reasoned conclusion. Therefore, clarifying a relationship between doctrines and