Preview

breaker morant speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
623 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
breaker morant speech
Suicide bombings in Syria, car bombing in Pakistan, shootings in Iraq and September 11 attacks on the world trade centre. These horrific actions were committed by the followers of Osama bin laden, the leader of the Taliban. 1

But we can’t completely blame bin laden because he isn’t committing this actions himself. The followers of bin laden have a choice to kill innocent people or to walk away from causing such destruction to the world but choose not to. 2

Harry “Breaker” Morant is similar in this way as he has the choice to follow these so called orders given to him by Lord Kitchener which were to kill unarmed and innocent Boers. 3

If Morant had any moral values he wouldn’t of followed this orders which would be violating anyone’s moral principles to an extent. No one had any knowledge of these orders that Lord Kitchener supposably gave out to all soldiers. 4

The order given out was to “take no prisoners” but somehow Mornat received and understood it to be “take no prisoners while clearing the district of the Boers.” If these orders were true why is it that Morant was the only one with any knowledge of it? 5

These are the question we always seem to ask but never able to get the truth. The first case was that of the shootings of the Boer commando, Visser, who was captured after the death of Captain Hunt and executed on Morant’s orders for allegedly being in possession of item of hunt’s uniform. 6

Morant pled not guilty. The prosecution witnesses were called and they testified about the death of hunt and Visser. Under cross examination, several testified that captain hunt had given them orders to take no prisoners. 7

Morant then testified that Hunt acted on orders to take no prisoners while clearing the district of Boer commandos. After hunts death he has assumed command, and decided to carry out orders.8

Would someone have the courage to kill an innocent man just because he is in possession of clothing? Morant is a cold blooded killer

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of the evidence was he was that, “there was no random discharge of firearms, the officer gave the orders. “ (Simon Winship) Simon describes how the Commander officer tells his men,”Halt, load and prime.” After that…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Afterwards, Monteith wrote to General Oliver Otis Howard, commander of the U.S. Army’s Department of the Columbia, which had jurisdiction over the Wallowa country. Monteith’s letter called the killing ‘willful, deliberate murder.’ Yet he advised Joseph to let white law determine justice. ‘I told him to keep his people quiet and all would end well.’…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amritsar Massacre Dbq

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On April 13, 1919, in Amritsar, India, a great tragedy occurred that day. The massacre that killed at least 379 people and the wounding of at least 1,200 others was committed by the British general Reginald Dyer (Cavendish). Many protests and riots preceded the massacre and resulting from them were the arrests of two leaders by the British ("Amritsar Massacre"). This caused many Indians to form mobs, which looted businesses and killed five British people (Cavendish). General Dyer was sent to Amritsar to restore order in there ("Amritsar Massacre"). What happened after he got there is why you, the Jury, are all in court today to decide General Dyer’s fate.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kilgren Raid Analysis

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages

    General George Meade was asked by the Robert E. Lee, a Confederate general if the assassination of President Davis was authorized by the United States Government. Meade then turned the investigation over to Kilpatrick. Kilpatrick replied to Meade saying that he wholeheartedly agreed with Dahlgren’s written orders except for the mention of assassination. “[...] he wrote Meade, ‘save as far as it speaks of exhorting the prisoners to destroy and burn the hateful city and kill the traitor Davis and his cabinet. All of this is false” (Aron 84). Kilpatrick also interviewed survivors from Dahlgren’s troops from the night of the raid, all urging no notice about the terroristic orders. In hindsight, whether or not if the orders were given to the troops, it does not necessarily mean the orders did not exist. In secrecy, Meade was suspicious of Kilpatrick's considering he did take everything in his power to get the raid initiated by the president and the secretary of war. “Indeed relying on Kilpatrick was, as historian Stephen Sears put it, ‘equivalent to ordering the fox to investigate losses in the henhouse.’ Kilpatrick, after all, was Dahlgren’s superior officer and may have given him the orders. If so, Kilpatrick had every reason to deny they were authentic” (Aron 85). Kilpatrick’s superiority status can affect the actions of Dahlgren and his soldiers. There is the underlying assumption that…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, later said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows, with Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie (Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony about the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the episode Join or Die, everything starts at the point of the Boston Massacre, due to the Coercive Acts, and most of the hour is spent on debating and choosing sides in court. After the event occurs, John Adams is asked to represent the English guards in the Massachusetts court of law. After hearing their story, he decided that representing them would only be right and just to the law. The viewers do not get to see John Adams’ planning process in the case, other than accepting it, since it jumps directly to the court scene. Here, the people of Massachusetts proceed in saying that the commander of the English guards, Captain Preston, told his men to fire upon the crowd of civilians. Adams opposes this and provides facts and evidence that contradict every part of the civilian argument, which is how he earns acquittal for the case against the guards. Later, Adams is offered a prominent position in the name of the King, but turns it down, which results in his appointment to the Continental Congress. This is where the episode ends, with Adams leaving his family and riding off to join the Congress.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All Quiet Study Guide

    • 5005 Words
    • 21 Pages

    12. What different attitudes about war were held by the “poor and simple” and those who were “better off”? The “poor and simple” knew the reality of suffering and so were not deceived by the talk of courage and heroism like the “better off”.…

    • 5005 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams was asked to defend the soldiers and their captain in court the day after the shootings. The soldiers had the odds against them. They were in an American court, with an American judge, and an American jury. No one else was bold enough to take on case as precarious as this case was. McCullough went on to state that John accepted this case because he strongly believed that no man in a free country should be denied the right to counsel and a fair trial (92). Adams knew what troubles he was getting himself into taking on a case like this and the repercussions it had. It would not have been his first difficult case, as he took on a similar case that involved four American sailors killing a British naval officer in self-defense that boarded the American ship. The captain was given a separate trial from the soldiers. Adam’s argued that it couldn’t be proven whether or not the captain gave orders to fire, and with a virtuoso performance given by Adams, the captain was found not guilty.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The policemen of Reserve Battalion 101 did meet their end and consequences. After Hitler committed suicide and the Allied officially ended the war in Europe, many of the policemen returned to their prewar occupations. Some of them, such as Hoffman and Wohlauf, remained in the police career while others were able to find postwar jobs. But, none of them were able to live freely as they were before World War II. Being on of the battalion that killed many Jews, they got interrogated and tried. Some policemen and Major Trapp all charged against their crime of killing seventy-eight Poles during their killing period and sentenced to death and executed while some got thrown into jail from three or more years (144). Around late 1962 and early 1967, most of the former members of the battalion got interrogated as well. Consequently, most of them ended up in jail for more than five years while only a few lucky ones did not go to…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For the men of Reserve Police Battalion 101 their first mission came in the summer of 1942 in the Polish village of Józefów and it entailed “shooting some 1,500 Jews.” Major Wilhelm Trapp who was in charge of the battalion at the time of the mission gave a speech to his men. In his speech he said in regards to what they were about to do, that it “was highly regrettable, but the orders came from the highest authorities.” Trapp admitted that he didn’t like the mission, however, he was instructing his men to commit the mass murders. Why would Trapp instruct them to do this if he thought the instructions were ludicrous? He instructed them to carry out the orders because of where the commands came from.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We were to clear the marketplace of all Jews, load them onto trucks, and shoot them all in the hidden forest. We were to immediately shoot those considered immobile, including infants and the elderly, at the marketplace then return to shoot the remaining Jews. Major Trapp continued speaking when I heard him proclaim “any of older men who did not feel up to the task that lay before them could step out” (57). My mind consumed a mass of information to fully comprehend the proposal. My immediate action included not to step out when suddenly the first man broke rank. At that same moment, his Captain grew furious and lashed out at him for one of his men were first to break rank. It was evident at the moment to not appear cowardly despite not participating in devious…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ordinary Men

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If one were to take anything from Christopher Browning’s Ordinary Men it is that even the most ordinary, normal men have the capacity to kill. The 101st Reserve Police Battalion executed at least 6,500 Jews at the Polish cities and villages of Jozefow, Lomazy, Serokomla, Lukow, Konskowola, Parczew, Radzyn, Kock, and Miedzyrzec and participated in the deportation of at least 42,000 Jews to the gas chambers in Treblinka (Browning, chapter 14, page 121). There were most likely even more killings that were never documented and much less remembered by the members of the 101st. These men had their first taste of death at Jozefow where they massacred 1,500 Polish Jews (Browning, chapter 8, page 74). It was a brutal and harrowing event where men, women, children, and the elderly were all executed, many in their own homes and even more in the forest surrounding the town. But out of this horror and chaos also came a sliver of hope for the souls of the men of the 101st when Major Trapp offered an interesting option; whoever did not have the stomach to participate in the executions could step out before the massacre was underway. Ten or twelve men accepted his offer (Browning, chapter 7, page 57). This would eventually lead to many men stepping away from executions in coming “actions”. Before the war these men were ordinary lower class workers who no doubt enjoyed many of the simple pleasures that we still enjoy today. These were ordinary men who found themselves in an extraordinary situation. They were ordinary men who became extraordinary killers.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Osama Bin Laden changed the world on September 11, 2012, when he orchestrated the 9/11 bombings on the World Trade Center in New York City. He has also formulated many other attacks including the October 2000 attack on the USS Cole, and attacks on the US embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania in 1998 (Encyclopedia of World 1). Osama Bin Laden had a negative influence on societies, economies, and religion throughout the world because of his actions in masterminding many radical terrorist attacks, and because he created and funded al-Qaeda.…

    • 2644 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    economy by these attacks. “While suicide is associated with hopelessness and depression, the actions of the bombers are seen as a matter of heroism and honor” (Borum, 2003). This lone wolf mentality showed the United States that their security measures were lacking in stopping their goal of boarding aircraft and creating such destruction and mayhem. Bin Laden’s goal was to show the Muslim Nation that the United States could be attacked and U.S. actions in response would prove its weakness as a…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, this is not the surprising aspect of the briefing. After briefing about the task, the points meant to reassure that it was absolutely “okay” to kill these innocent men and women. Trapp, further says that “if any of the older men among them does not like to do the task can move out. This chapter leaves the reader in desperately knowing whether any of the men from the battalion stepped out from taking part in the genocide. I thought definitely people would have moved out avoiding to be responsible for execution of thousands of innocent people. But rather than knowing my answer, story moved to the second…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays