Preview

Broadcaster Erwin Tulfo Sues Inquirer F

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
629 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Broadcaster Erwin Tulfo Sues Inquirer F
Broadcaster Erwin Tulfo sues Inquirer for libel

Philippine Daily Inquirer 3:35 AM | Tuesday, March 25th, 2014

TV5 News anchor Erwin Tulfo on Monday filed a libel case in the Quezon City Prosecutor’s Office against the Philippine Daily Inquirer, seeking P12 million in damages for reporting that he allegedly benefited from the diversion of congressional pork barrel funds, through a state agency, to dubious nongovernment organizations (NGOs).
Named respondents were Inquirer editor-in-chief Letty Jimenez-Magsanoc, managing editor Jose Ma. Nolasco, news editor Artemio Engracia Jr. and reporter Nancy Carvajal.
In the March 19 report, the newspaper named Tulfo and another radio news anchor as recipients of allocations in the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) coursed through the National Agribusiness Corp (Nabcor) and subsequently to NGOs.
The report was based on documents provided by former Nabcor officials Rhodora Mendoza and Vicente Cacal to the Office of the Ombudsman claiming that 83 lawmakers instructed Nabcor, an agency attached to the Department of Agriculture (DA), to release P1.7 billion from the PDAF to questionable NGOs, including those controlled by Janet Lim-Napoles.
Napoles is under investigation in connection with the alleged diversion of PDAF funds to ghost projects and kickbacks. Mendoza and Cacal are among the 38 people under investigation. They have offered to become state witnesses.
Speaking to reporters, Tulfo said that in filing the libel case he wanted to clear up things. He confirmed that he received in 2009 a check for P245,535 but that this was payment of the premiums for 3-minute advertisements on his 2-hour program then aired over DZXL-Radio Mindanao Network (RMN). He said there was nothing illegal in the transaction.
He said that as a radio broadcaster then, the 3-minute commercials were for the DA and not specifically for Nabcor.
“Maybe it was misinterpreted by the paper. The whistle-blowers had to come up with something new,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ameripride Case Summary

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On Aril 20,2012 the Court issued its Order determining issues raised at the trial, including the award of interest, adopting all undisputed facts of the Pretrial Order. The Court entered judgment orsering TEO to pay $9, 974,421.95 and issued a declaratory judgment holing TEO responsible for one-half of all future cleanup…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    investigation going on by the U.S. Attorney’s office for the central district of California in…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lieutenant Junior Grade Daniel "Danny" Kaffee (Tom Cruise), is an inexperienced U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General 's Corps lawyer who leads the defense in the court-martial of two Marines, Private First Class Louden Downey (James Marshall) and Lance Corporal Harold Dawson (Wolfgang Bodison), who are accused of murdering a fellow Marine of their unit, PFC William Santiago (Michael DeLorenzo), at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba, which is under the command of Col. Nathan R. Jessup (Jack Nicholson).…

    • 1500 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clark Jones won the libel suit against the WorldNetDailly.com in 2008. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff and awarded plaintiff $165,000,000 in compensatory damages on his libel claim and monetary damages on his business claims (WorldNetDailly, 2008. para.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the magazine either knew the story was false or acted with reckless disregard of the facts.…

    • 2540 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mathur was the National Research Council adviser who had duties that included; assisting the company for applying for government grants. Mathur’s wife Priti Mathur owned the company that had received the $300,000 in “consulting” fees from the private company. These had been unethical transactions that took place between 1999 and also 2003.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Boston Marathon

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    peeled away what was originally reported becomes evident that the reports were quick to judge.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Martin, Linda Jo. "Report of Georgia Senator Nancy Schaefer on CPS Corruption." Fightcps. N.p., 29 Feb. 2008. Web. May 2013.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case of Dow Jones & Company Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575, [2002] HCA 56 raised the legal principle of defamation and its application when committed over the internet. In this instance, an article published on 30 October 2000 in a weekly financial magazine, a magazine which in turn was published by Dow Jones & Company Inc (‘Dow Jones’). The article, entitled ‘Unholy Gains’ alleged that Joseph Gutnick (‘Gutnick’) was connected to a jailed money launderer and tax evader and was involved in these activities himself. The article was accompanied by a large photograph of Gutnick. The edition of the magazine sold 305,363 copies and 550,000 subscribers accessed the article online, with 1,700 of the online subscribers using an…

    • 2423 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question 1

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page

    About the first woman, the statement published by Orange Daily is “Tommy Wan has had sex affairs with several women, including an actress“ and “The first runner-up in the1987 Singing Contest held by HKTV” . This refer to the actress who had sex with Tommy. The form of defamation is libel which published through newspaper. It doesn’t matter whether the publisher didn’t intend that meaning. What matters is what ordinary readers or viewers will make of it. Therefore, when reader go through the record of HKTV Singing Contest, the identity of the first women is revealed. The ordinary readers familiar with this famous person, will understand the article to be referring to her. This means the defamation refers to the claimant indirectly.…

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    case digest 1

    • 1773 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The trial court found that the alleged donation by the deceased Simplicia Nepomuceno of the four parcels of land in question had not been duly proven, there being no written document to support it, and that therefore the said four parcels of land should be brought into collation. It also found that the alleged receipt by the plaintiff from his mother of P1,110 in cash and of P1,220 with which the plaintiff purchased the two…

    • 1773 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PDAF SCANDAL

    • 2388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PDAF or Priority Development Assistance Fund is a form of pork barrel which has been a very controversial issue in our country today. These are funds given or allocated to government officials in order to support and be spent on community projects and/or repairs and improvements. G. Luis Igaya of Institute for Popular Democracy defined pork barrel as…

    • 2388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    torts defamation

    • 1112 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Defamation according to Lord Atkin in the case of Sim v Stretch is a statement untrue whether oral or written, temporary or permanent, which injures the reputation of another by exposing him to hatred, contempt, or ridicule, or which tends to lower him in the right thinking member of the society or which tends to make them shun or avoid that person. There are two types of defation which are libel and slander. Libel is defamation in permanent form and usually addressed to the eyes either in written or printed. Libel is actionable per se where the plaintiff does not need to prove actual damage. There is case of Dato Syed Kechick bin Syed Mohamad v Dato Yeh Pao Tzu & Ors where the cartoons that the plaintiff was featured imputed that he was used his position with the Foundation to unlawful gathering of personal fortune and there was clear inference which could be drawn by ordinary men that pointed to him as dishonest and untrustworthy. Slander in the other hand includes the defamation in transient form such as in oral or spoken words. Referring to Daud situation, the defamation is actionable per se and falls under libel as the statement was made in written form in the magazine. In order to succeed in his action, there are three elements that need to be fulfilled.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Birds of Prey

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is defined as the communication that tends to hurt a person's reputation. The words used can be classified as ‘per quod’ which are indirect, ironic or metaphoric. This article served as an instrument to degrade the personality of the complainant. He (complainant) was exposed to public humiliation.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, in the actual implementation, these safeguards were circumvented or ignored. No checking of NGOs was made, no public bidding held and no bonds required. After a recent Senate committee hearing, an exasperated Sen. Francis Escudero blurted out that the PDAF was riddled with “ghost deliveries, fake receipts, NGOs that you can’t locate, and nonexistent suppliers.” The net result: The pork barrel, in the billion pesos, rolled into private pockets.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics