The first argument states that without such a misunderstanding how could a handful of Spaniards conquer the great Aztec state. The only way these so called mighty conquerors could have pulled off this unbelievable conquest is that the Aztecs were fooled in the worst way. The Aztecs fell victim to their devoutness and calendric coincidence and that could be the only reason that the mighty Aztec s feel to the quite lucky Spaniards. If the Aztecs had not been confused by the major coincidences, they could have blew the Spaniards off like other Native American tribes, like the South Sea Islanders did with Captain Cook. Cortes just happened to be in good fortune to land on Aztec soil at this time.…
In Burying the White Gods: New Perspectives on the Conquest of Mexico, Author Camilla Townsend describes the interaction between the Conquistadors and the Natives during the time of the Conquest. Townsend argues that the tale of Conquistadors being seen by the natives as Gods is a fabricated lie of history by the Conquistadores themselves, but what rather happened is they were seen for what they truly were men with superior technology. Camilla Townsends’ sources are those as follows. One source of which the origins are known, that being the Letters of Cortes. Two more sources from other conquistadors, Francisco de Aguilar and Bernal Diaz del Castillo.…
The Victors and Vanquished is a book that was edited by Stuart B. Schwartz in the year 2000. From reading the acknowledgements I gathered that Schwartz preparation with the book involved the help of his colleagues too. He even attended Yale University as a Professor and gave a seminar of the conquest of Mexico. However, Schwartz is not a researcher in Mexican ethnohistory, but a man whose goal is to spread new discoveries to people who enjoy culture’s past. The document that Schwartz presented the perspective of the Spaniards and Nahua during the conquest of Mexico.…
Anderson also shared his views of Miguel Leon-Portilla’s book The Broken Spears. According to Arthur J.O. Anderson even though Miguel Leon-Portilla’s book is mostly of the defeat, the chaos, and grief the Aztecs endured, it is also a story that wanted to remind Spain of their debt they owe to the Aztecs . In my opinion, I also felt that this story was written to make the Spanish aware of their dark history and chaos they brought to ancient Mesoamerica. The book is written in the Aztec perspective and it depicts the Spanish as greedy, careless men who tried to annihilate any trace of Mesoamerican culture and tried to enforce their own way of life. So I do agree with Anderson and feel that the Spanish do owe a huge debt to the natives of Mesoamerican. Anderson also discussed how many natives after the conquest of Mexico were taught by Spanish Francian friars to read and write Spanish and Latin as well as to put their native language into Latin. Unos annles de la nacion Mexicana written in 1528 put native accounts written in Nahuatl with Spanish translation from the Franciscan fathers into one source. The Broken Spears included writings which traced back to the first transliterations such as Unos annles de la nacion Mexicana or The Codex Florentino and many other accounts. Anderson deeply appreciated the energy, artistry and poetry that went in Miguel Leon-Portilla’s book. He felt that Leon-Portilla selected a decent background of the Aztec culture and used effective sources that told the descriptions of the natives very well. He felt that the reader would find Leon-Portilla’s work to be interesting, accurate, and useful to…
For example Montezuma and his lords and nobles doesn't touch the ground or kiss the earth when greeting Cortes and his men. Another difference is the necklace that was placed on the neck of Montezuma by Cortes himself. Actually, it was Montezuma who gives and place a necklace of gold and stone on Cortes ( Nahuatl Accounts of the Conquest of Mexico 115). But this account also depicts Montezuma subjecting himself to Cortes while saying the land belonged to Cortes because when Montezuma gave a speech or spoke to Cortes he said "you have reached your land, your settlement, your home Mexico"(Nahuatl Accounts of the Conquest of Mexico 117). In addition that Montezuma was a temporarily ruler only sitting at the throne until Cortes…
The Spanish conquests of Montezuma and the Aztecs were both a Spanish conquest as well as an Indian civil war. The thing that ties them both together is the Conquistador Hernan Cortes. You could argue for both sides as to which played a more significant part in the fall of the Aztecs, however, I feel they both played an equal role in the defeat of the Aztecs and the fall of Tenochititlan to the Spaniards.…
The Broken Spears written by Miguel Leon-Portilla is a book that goes into depth about the conquest of Mexico starting in 1519 from an Aztec point of view. The book discusses everything in depth about what occurred during this time period of the conquest. It discusses when the Aztecs first take news of the arrival of Cortez and the Spaniards comparing it to small floating mountains off the Mexican coast, all the way to the revolt of the Aztec people that lead to the end of the Aztec civilization. This book portrays the story from an Aztec point of view so it is clear that the author is on the Aztecs side.…
Diaz’s narrative is questionable considering that he had produced it not only at the ripe age of eighty four, but he had also done so over forty years after the events had taken place. Reasonably, bias would play a role in his narrative, seeing as he was involved in the events as a soldier and he would most likely want him and his people to not seem like villains in the eyes of others. The presentation and tone of Diaz’s narrative was kept was kept more so light. He did not try to paint the Aztecs as villains, which would cause one to determine that there is some truth to his word, the only question being what parts are accurate and which are filled with bias. Some of his claims such as that their reasoning behind capturing Montezuma was due to fear of facing attack seems questionable. It should be noted that the Spanish came to this decision following their trips to the marketplace where they had seen its enticing success, although that may not be their actual reasoning as to why the choice to do so. With all this considered, the document did include details such as the perspective of a Spanish soldier as well as which would still be relevant in today’s time to create a base of the events that occurred back in…
When discussing the importance of Spanish alliances, it is important to discuss Matthew Restall’s interpretation of “the myth of the white conquistador”. A common myth in regards to the Spanish Conquest is that the Aztecs were conquered by a small group of white Spanish men. Within Restall’s book titled “Seven Myths of the Spanish Conquest”, he debunks the myth of the white conquistadors. Restall’s argues that “there is no doubt that the Spanish were consistently outnumbered by native enemies on the battlefield. But what has so often been ignored or forgotten is the fact that Spaniards tended also to be outnumbered by their own native allies. Furthermore, the invisible warriors of this myth took an additional form, that of the Africans, free and enslave, who accompanied Spanish…
Looking at the Spanish account it seems somewhat biased considering Cortes was trying to please his king. The Aztecs had no one to please, they were just writing their account to explain what happened. On page 400 of our textbook it says “ Montezuma met with Cortes in the hopes of avoiding war.” Which corroborates with the Aztecs account which states, “Our lords, that is enough! What are you doing? These people are not carrying shields or macanas. Our lords, they are completely unarmed!” this means they were unarmed. Which is a direct counter to the Spanish account written by Cortes which states the the Aztecs were pointing spears at him and his…
Hernan Cortes landed on the east coast of the Aztec empire where the natives mistaken for Quetzalcoatl. Cortes ran with it and told his men to shine their armor so they will reflect the sun making them to appear to have a Heavenly glow. This worked well even convincing the leader of the Aztec empire -Montezuma II- that Cortez and his men were deities. On Cortez's way to the capitol, Tenochtitlan Cortes gained allies among the natives under Aztec control. Montezuma II made the mistake of sending big loads of gold and silver to Cortez as tribute, still under the belief that he was a deity only encouraging Cortez for there to conquer for more treasure. Cortez ended up taking the capital hand going down in history as one of the biggest contributors…
When Cortes showed up, the Aztecs welcomed him with open arms. They treated him very kindly. However, knowing that the Aztecs had a lot of gold, The Spanish continually pestered Montezuma for more and more gold. Most of the gold in the city was given to the Spanish. it is estimated that by May they had collected eight tons of gold and silver.…
Montezuma was an aztec ruler. He is often referred to Cortez. Montezuma opened the aztec empire to Cortez in open arms. He believed Cortez was basically a god because the aztecs believed a god will come with white skin with new advancements. Montezuma opened the city to Cortez only to be betrayed. Cortez and his men ended up destroying the aztec capitol city of Tenochtitlan and one year later renaming it "Mexico City, New Spain." Montezuma was a very harsh ruler, and also perceived as a fool for letting Cortez in the city.…
we will continue living, we will awaken this will make us happy” (Nezahualcoyotl). It all began in 1519,the Aztecs and the Spaniards will cross paths which will end in catastrophe. The Aztecs had a peculiar religion that would worship gods and sacrifice in favor for their gods. The Spaniards, the ones who ended up destroying one of the strongest civilizations at the time, the Aztec empire. The arrival of the Spaniards to Central America negatively affected the indigenous people of the area.…
What made their lives so different? Todorov argues that unlike Montezuma and his people, Cortes was well-versed in the cultural world. Living in Europe, he was situated geographically close to multiple cultures and languages; but perhaps he was most familiar was the Moors, whom he fought in 1571. At an early age, Cortes was able to recognize the Other, and used this to his advantage while battling against Montezuma. This is specifically shown when Cortes fired the bomb because Cortes was aware that the Other, in this case the Aztecs, had never heard or even seen gunpowder. Additionally, Cortes grew up in a literate culture that could compare different languages and histories in books, something Montezuma never had access to. Because he grew up in a literate society, Cortes was very informed about the world and was thus able to recognize cultural diversity. Due to this and his far superior information bank, Cortes managed to manipulate and wield Montezuma and his people. Thus, Cortes had huge advantages that helped him to defeat Montezuma and grasp power over the Aztec Empire. In sum, Todorov claimed that because of proximate cultural and underlying linguistic factors, such as his awareness of diversity and access to historical and informational texts, Cortes was able to manipulate and defeat…