enjoy its “sensual pleasures,” giving him skewed viewpoint in comparison to the lower class (Doc. 2). Another Chinese scholar who chose to remain anonymous also praises Buddhism by explaining how it subtly coexisted with Confucianism. He says plainly that Buddhism was little heard of simply because written works do not include all of the facts (Doc. 3). Additionally, he justifies the ways the monks, which in turn justify the Way of Buddha. Monks give up having wives and children to live by the Way and acquire pureness and wisdom (Doc. 3). A huge part of the Way of Buddha is the Four Noble Truths, all of which revolve around sorrow (Doc. 1). Preached by Buddha, the Four Truths say everything is sorrow, sorrow comes from desire, desire needs to be stopped, and one needs to abide by the Way (Doc. 1). Zong Mi is perhaps the most pro- Buddhism scholar. He describes Confucius and Buddha as perfect sages, establishing their ideas to reward the good and pure and punish the bad (Doc. 5). Mi believes both teachings will lead to a perfect society and should therefore be highly respected (Doc. 5). Despite all the praise it received for spreading, Buddhism was also highly criticized. Han Yu, a Confucian scholar regarded Buddhism as “no more than a cult of the barbarian[s],” (Doc. 4). Yu has very traditional Confucian views and thus wants to stop the spread of Buddhism. His viewpoint, however, is highly biased because he is working for the government and is afraid of losing power to religion (Doc. 4). Emperor Wu, another government official, authorized an edict on Buddhism saying the religion was slowly crushing the traditions of the country (Doc. 6). Additionally, the emperor believed Buddhism was wearing people out and draining their wealth. He says one man converting and not working caused another to starve (Doc. 6). Emperor Wu and his empire stand to lose money if Buddhism takes over so just as Han Yu, the emperor has a skewed viewpoint and fears the government no longer being on top (Doc. 6). Although all the documents are informative, each one is missing the opposing viewpoint. For example, the documents written by government officials would be more helpful with the viewpoint of the citizens as well. More specifically, after reading Emperor Wu’s decree against Buddhism, a peasant’s viewpoint would be very helpful to determine how they were affected. Was Buddhism as big of a threat as the government thought it was? Although there were both positive and negative responses to the spread of Buddhism, it really comes down to who is being asked because it affected everyone differently.
enjoy its “sensual pleasures,” giving him skewed viewpoint in comparison to the lower class (Doc. 2). Another Chinese scholar who chose to remain anonymous also praises Buddhism by explaining how it subtly coexisted with Confucianism. He says plainly that Buddhism was little heard of simply because written works do not include all of the facts (Doc. 3). Additionally, he justifies the ways the monks, which in turn justify the Way of Buddha. Monks give up having wives and children to live by the Way and acquire pureness and wisdom (Doc. 3). A huge part of the Way of Buddha is the Four Noble Truths, all of which revolve around sorrow (Doc. 1). Preached by Buddha, the Four Truths say everything is sorrow, sorrow comes from desire, desire needs to be stopped, and one needs to abide by the Way (Doc. 1). Zong Mi is perhaps the most pro- Buddhism scholar. He describes Confucius and Buddha as perfect sages, establishing their ideas to reward the good and pure and punish the bad (Doc. 5). Mi believes both teachings will lead to a perfect society and should therefore be highly respected (Doc. 5). Despite all the praise it received for spreading, Buddhism was also highly criticized. Han Yu, a Confucian scholar regarded Buddhism as “no more than a cult of the barbarian[s],” (Doc. 4). Yu has very traditional Confucian views and thus wants to stop the spread of Buddhism. His viewpoint, however, is highly biased because he is working for the government and is afraid of losing power to religion (Doc. 4). Emperor Wu, another government official, authorized an edict on Buddhism saying the religion was slowly crushing the traditions of the country (Doc. 6). Additionally, the emperor believed Buddhism was wearing people out and draining their wealth. He says one man converting and not working caused another to starve (Doc. 6). Emperor Wu and his empire stand to lose money if Buddhism takes over so just as Han Yu, the emperor has a skewed viewpoint and fears the government no longer being on top (Doc. 6). Although all the documents are informative, each one is missing the opposing viewpoint. For example, the documents written by government officials would be more helpful with the viewpoint of the citizens as well. More specifically, after reading Emperor Wu’s decree against Buddhism, a peasant’s viewpoint would be very helpful to determine how they were affected. Was Buddhism as big of a threat as the government thought it was? Although there were both positive and negative responses to the spread of Buddhism, it really comes down to who is being asked because it affected everyone differently.