Preview

BULGARIA SLOW TRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3896 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
BULGARIA SLOW TRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY
BULGARIA SLOW TRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY
By
Presented to
Javier Rodriguez
Political Actors and Behaviors I
Universidad Carlos III
Monday, May 13, 2014

Introduction
Following the revolution of 1989, communist countries started the challenging road to the consolidation of democratization. These countries that had been under the communist regime for several decades have to reorganize the country under specific policies and structure.
Historical and Socio-economic context of Bulgaria are explored as they are for post communism indicators of the how well democratic consolidation is done relative to other central eastern European countries. In Bulgaria, the absence of opposition party before 1989, the structure and orientation of the political institution, the presence of a substantial ethnic minority, the weak parliament and the lack of experience of the personal are all factors that impact Bulgaria’s transition to democracy. Furthermore the development of the Bulgarian Communist Party is monitored until it became recognized as a democratic center left party. Indeed, in late 90’s this party was viewed as illegitimate and discredited however it still was in power for several years after the fall of communism and returned to power in the 21st century. This party has been in the political sphere since 1944 had a notable impact on party politics and on government policies and reform efforts and its development is a valuable indicator of Bulgaria position within its transition to democracy. Also is analyzed the development of democracy within Bulgaria after 7 years of status-quo. And the new way to the NATO and European Union. The political actors will be introduced and the election results after 1997.
Literature Review
During the WWI, Bulgaria was allied with the axis power but couldn't provide them with much help in regards of resources and troops. In September 1944, Russia declared war on Bulgaria however this was perceived as a friendly takeover of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2: Russia become involved in WWI after Austria declared war against Serbia, because Russia had made itself the guardian of all Slavic and/or Eastern Orthodox peoples, particularly the south-slaves in the Balkans who has for centuries been under Muslim- Ottoman domination.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Paul Seary Case

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages

    ‘The best managed of these transitions was the Hungarian one where, almost until the end of 1989, the local ruling party managed to control the process. Hungary’s communists were well aware of the growing crisis of authority. The younger better educated membership looked to recast the basis on which the party exercised its authority by seeking an alliance with political traditions outside the party – especially nationalism. Pozsgay and nationalist intellectuals founded the country’s first non-communist organisation since 1956.....by Spring 1989, Hungary’s Communists were formally committed to a multi- party system and the introduction of a market economy to replace the socialist economic system...At the same time, an increasingly organised opposition grew in strength – they brought 150,000 people on to the streets of Budapest on March 15th, 1989, the anniversary of the outbreak of the 1848 revolution. They were increasingly unified, forming an opposition round table and demanding negotiations with the government over the nature and timing of democratic transition- negotiations that began in the summer and which had led by September to basic agreement over most of the details of Hungary’s transition.…

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting with the free elections in Poland (1989) along with the collapse of the Berlin Wall (1989), the communist party found it difficult to hold on to many of the eastern and central European countries that wanted self rule.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In April 1986, Mr. Gorbachev began the perestroika, translation “reconstruction”, which was to end the Cold War that effectively brought down the Iron Curtain. The split between West and East not only partitioned the world into two parts, but also divided the European family for over 40 years. With the fall of the Soviet Union came many changes that affected much if not all of Europe.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When comparing the communist nation of China with the democratic nation of Australia many differences are apparent. The application of the legislative (law making and modifying function), executive (administrative function) and judiciary (law enforcing and dispute resolving function) is vastly different between the two nations as can see when we compare and contrast the underlying principles of each system of government. Firstly, both nations claim to uphold the concept of the rule of law, although due to corruptive forces surrounding the Chinese court system, this concept is often thwarted and equality before the law is not upheld. Within the constitutions of both nations the basic principles of separation of powers have been applied; however on examination of the practice of separation within the nations we find that convention (in the case of Australia) and the corruptive influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) have not allowed such separation. Finally, the representation of the people by each nation’s governments will be compared through examining contrasting election and law making practices. With reference to the three arms of government, the comparisons made between the underlying principles of both China and Australia’s systems of government will support the understanding that democratic nations are a government of the people, by the people, for the people; making them just, whilst communist nations often struggle to provide the same justice and citizen involvement in their political process.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Western Democratic Socialism demonstrates to the world what a feasible, arguably successful form of socialism looks like. Conversely, the economic, political, and social challenges of Eastern European Socialism eventually led to the collapse of the Soviet Union under Gorbachev, demonstrating a form of socialism that proved incapable of being maintained. Some would say that the USSR was not an impactful form of socialism because it did not last into the 21st century. However, you cannot judge the impact of socialism based on how long that it lasted; instead, judgment of the impact can be based on what was accomplished while this form of socialism existed. In the time that the Soviet Union existed, the USSR was able to implement socialism and major changes were made. These two poles of socialism have sparked a debate about the advantages of socialism, as well as its possible obsolescence or viability. Due to this discussion, they are the most impactful forms of…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    "History is something we make together", Orhan Pamuk once said. It is also something we enjoy together, I would add, because it is often a play of coincidences. Bulgaria is a beautiful country in Europe. The geographical location of Bulgaria is in the South East of Europe on the Balkan Peninsula. It has an interesting geography. It has mountains on the south and the middle and valleys in between. The entire border on the East is constituted by the coastline of the Black Sea. Romania is the border on the North separated by the Danube River. To the West is Serbia…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the fall of the Soviet Union 1991 many changes have been brought to Europe. After the fall of the Soviet Union newly formed countries of Eastern Europe found themselves brought into a new era, many of the people had relied on the Soviet Union’s system of socialism to help them with every detail of their lives and to dictate their lives but with this newfound freedom citizens had many changes forced upon them. All they once knew had been taken away so suddenly most didn’t know what to do with themselves. The Government, Economy and Marxist Idealism had all fallen with the Soviet Union. Citizens had no choice but to move on with their new lives because it was as their past lives had never even existed, but like every change it came with confusion and difficulty and left the people of Eastern Europe wanting answers to their questions and solutions to their problems. Despite the gear towards democracy that had begun under soviet rule, it posed a challenge for many countries of Eastern Europe. While Gorbachev held power, policies such as the reconstructing of the Soviet Union, and reducing the censorship of information this newfound freedom had the people eager for more. When the Soviet Union Collapsed, Naturally the people turned to democracy as their new form of government which would offer the freedom the people of Eastern Europe Wanted. Even thought they wanted a democratic nation they lacked many of the skills needed to achieve it such as, the ability to engage in “political discourse, the ability to compromise and many other things, which was understandable due to their socialist rule for so many years. Other frustration stemmed from the difficulty of transforming a socialist economy to a free-market economy. Though the people of Eastern Europe were optimistic, their optimism did not last very long. Between 1990 and 1994 Eastern European countries saw a huge jump in unemployment because of the fall of…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to be recognised as a new and independent country, such nation must be able to determine what system of government should be used. If the new country will choose the democratic form of government, there are two systems to be chosen. These include parliamentary and the presidential system. The main goal of this paper is to determine the pros and cons of parliamentary and presidential system in a new country.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For well over half a century the Soviet Union was one of the most powerful empires in history (1985-1991). At its peak it included 15 national republics so wide they covered 13 time zones. However the communist party determined the USSR’s political, economic and military destiny for several decades. The reform of the system aimed to enhance the whole economic structure, strengthen it and make the Soviet Union profitable and popular. Nevertheless the party opposition led to its demise in the nineties. The Soviet Union was created in October 1917 by a small but devout band of revolutionaries…

    • 4825 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fall of the Soviet Union resulted in a major collapse of many countries. Bulgaria and Romania were two countries that had ties and many distinctions. They both consisted of a strong, violent communist leader that resulted the demolishment of communism at the end. Each of these leaders was cruel and harsh on the people of their country. Injustice played a big role between the two countries that led to war and inhumane actions. Ethnical and race feuds became an eye opening event for the citizens of these countries. Though, the difference was that Romania enforced laws but Bulgaria and the other five countries didn’t. Romania didn’t have foundations that supported their communist system, which was the cause of major collapse.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communism vs Democracy

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Democracy and communism are the two main governing systems ever to be set into motion. Effects of both of these systems can be observed in many countries worldwide. Democracy is the political orientation of those who favor government by the people or by their elected representatives, whereas communism is a form of socialism that abolishes private ownership which means that all means of production such as land and natural resources are owned by the entire community. Of course, more modern forms of these two governances are adopted by the countries that prefer to do so. Although democracy and communism are two opposite governing systems, a certain amount of similarities can still be found.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Communism is a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state (4). In the communist system, all individuals are equal. No matter how much one works, everyone gets equal pay; therefore, this decreases personal motivation to work hard. The government also takes away all property rights, which prevents people from having the ability to make their own wealth (1). All of the property in the country is taken into the hands of the government and they equally distribute it to the population. The citizens that break the law have to face severe punishments, depending on what those countries’ laws are.…

    • 3818 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contents1 The Rise and Rule of Single-party States * 1.1 The Emergence of single party states in Europe after 1917 * 1.2 China- Mao Zedong * 1.3 Italy- Benito Mussolini * 1.4 Germany- Adolf Hitler * 1.5 Russia- Josef Stalin * 1.6 Cuba- Fidel Castro…

    • 7795 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ib Hoa

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Communism was desirable and effective but needed changing; More democracy was needed to improve living standards and production levels; People began to criticise the party more directly and confidently.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays