Preview

Bundling Tasks Into Jobs and Subunits

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3599 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bundling Tasks Into Jobs and Subunits
Chapter 13 - Decision Rights: Bundling Tasks Into Jobs And Subunits

CHAPTER 13 DECISION RIGHTS: BUNDLING TASKS INTO JOBS AND SUBUNITS CHAPTER SUMMARY This chapter is the second of two on the assignment of decision rights. It analyzes the bundling of tasks into jobs and jobs into the basic subunits of the firm, and discusses recent trends in the assignment of decision rights. The appendix presents a gametheoretic example of some of the issues that arise in coordinating functional managers. CHAPTER OUTLINE BUNDLING TASKS INTO JOBS Specialized versus Broad Task Assignment Benefits of Specialized Task Assignment Exploiting Comparative Advantage Lower Cross-Training Expenses Historical Application: Adam Smith on the Economies of Specialization Costs of Specialized Task Assignment Forgone Complementarities across Tasks Coordination Costs Functional Myopia Reduced Flexibility Incentive Issues Productive Bundling of Tasks Managerial Application: Regulation Limits Bundling of Tasks BUNDLING OF JOBS INTO SUBUNITS Grouping Jobs by Function Managerial Application: Concentrating on Functions at Cadillac Grouping Jobs by Product or Geography Managerial Application: H-P Combines Two Operating Divisions Trade-offs between Functional and Product or Geographic Subunits Benefits of Functional Subunits Problems with Functional Subunits Benefits of Product or Geographic Subunits Problems with Product or Geographic Subunits Managerial Application: Citigroup Reorganizes to Control Conflicts Where Functional Subunits Work Best Environment, Strategy, and Architecture Matrix Organizations Managerial Application: Intel Corporation—A Matrix Organization Mixed Designs Network Organization Organizing within Subunits
13-1

Chapter 13 - Decision Rights: Bundling Tasks Into Jobs And Subunits

RECENT TRENDS IN ASSIGNMENTS OF DECISION RIGHTS Managerial Application: An Executive Perspective on Increased Foreign Competition Historical Application: F.W. Taylor on Iron Workers Managerial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    BUSI690 Rothaermel Ex 3

    • 1270 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A functional structure groups employees into teams, allowing for increased decision-making at lower levels of the managerial chain (Rothaermel, 2013). The opportunity for specialization allows for the functional structure to be employed with each of the business-level strategies: cost leadership, differentiation, or integration (Rothaermel, 2013). One of the hurdles to overcome would be the likely increase in difficulties which arise from departmentalization of the varying teams (Rothaermel, 2013). The best way to overcome such a hurdle is through cross-functional teams (Rothaermel, 2013).…

    • 1270 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every employee in Kudler Fine Foods has an important role within organizational structure. The functional structure at Kudler Fine Foods allows each department to become self-efficient. However, functional organizational structure has drawbacks. Functional structure drawbacks are coordination and communication (Writing, 2014). For Kudler to each there organizational goals, the company must reduce these drawbacks. Collaboration between departments and the organizations core competencies will guide Kudler to reach their goals and reduce any…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Org 581

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Starbucks divides its labor into cross functional work teams, which allows employees to report to multiple supervisors. “This structural behavior has allowed the corporation to have successful communication upward, downward and laterally with its employees” (“Successful Application of Organizational Behavior: Starbucks,” 2009). The matrix structure seems to work for Starbucks, as they maintain effective communication, great product development, efficient production, and exemplary customer service as a result.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Caesars’ Entertainment has developed the functional structure. “Functional structure is set up so that each portion of the organization is grouped according to its purpose. In this type of organization, for example, there may be a marketing department, a sales department and a production department.” (Writing, 2014) While every department within the organization is responsible for themselves, they must all work together to make sure the business is successful. The CEO of Caesars’ Entertainment has appointed regional presidents because they are familiar with a specific area. The regional presidents are responsible for targeting the correct market. “Organizational structure provides guidance to all employees by laying out the official reporting relationships that govern the workflow of the company.” (Ingram, 2014)…

    • 1190 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 3 Assignment

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Matrix organizations are structures that allow for more than one supervisor and greatly support teamwork among those within the organization. Matrix organizational structures are ideal for larger organizations, which is a great advantage given our significant increase in both staff and business. Following a matrix structure would allow the organization to double in size without losing the significance of the goals set forth. A disadvantage of matrix organizational structure, as with large organizations is often inevitable, is the ability of…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The contrasting of these organizational structure : matrix decision making is decentralized with one upper management boss. Matrix career ladder and opportunities is dual. Divisional decision making is a central chain of command. Division upper management consist of one boss per division and one career ladder and opportunity per division. Functional is a central chain of command with its upper management consist of one boss per team and one main career ladder per…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reflect on your reading for the week, specifically Analytical Exercise 8. Is another form of structural configuration better suited to multiproduct, multiservice companies? If not, is there a form of departmentalization for multiproduct, multiservice companies which would match somewhat the divisional structure configuration?"…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For an organization to achieve its objectives and goals, the jobs of the members of the organization must be connected into logical patterns of relationships and activities. This cohesion is attained through the nature of relations and the structure of the organization. Decisions regarding the future are drawn by people and the strategies are also implemented by people. The accomplishment of a certain objective set will be dependent on both how the decisions are arrived at and also on how those decisions are being implemented by the employees of the organization. Lateral organizational structures encompass individuals from different departments and groups in the organization. This relation involves individuals at the same level of management and involves consultation and coordination (Hall, 1975; Galbraith, 1995).…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, most companies have an organizational structure, which gives a lot of character to the company and allows the consumers to see what the company values. Certain companies may have an organizational structure such as a divisional structure which is basically where functionalities of that company are divided based on the “functional” areas. However, there is also a matrix structure. A matrix structure consists of placing employees in an area based on the functional and divisional area.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam 1 Final

    • 1104 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. The degree to which organizational tasks are subdivided into separate jobs is referred to as…

    • 1104 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The organization of work is in the midst of transformation. In many industries, mass production by large, vertically-integrated, hierarchically-organized firms is giving way to more flexible forms of both internal…

    • 4699 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hrm/531 Week 9

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Functional departmentalization: grouping jobs according to function (engineering manager, accounting manager, manufacturing manager, HR manager, purchasing manager…)…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Organizational Structures

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In a functional arrangement, power or status is defined by a vertical hierarchy. This structure clearly defines the roles and responsibilities of its members and the chain of command is plainly outlined. (Kerzner, 2003). Functional structure is seen in large organizations such as the central government, polices forces and the armed forces. Large businesses have continuous rolling programs of similar repetitive or semi-repetitive work and this structure is typically used to improve systems, procedures, methods or products within the company. Due to the repetitive nature of the functional structure people are able to build a variety of skills that they can use from one project to the next. Projects within this structure would commonly be handled internally rather than externally. (Cogeco, 2006). When modifying systems or methods within a business it is beneficial for the company to have in-house employees who have direct contact with the work to handle the improvements.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the effects of the merger of company A and company B is the power struggle and fights for control that arises from combining the two organizations. Company A was a smaller agency, with a definite hierarchal operating structure displaying a centralization of power, while company B was of a horizontal nature, scattering power from self-determined employees to upper management. Increasing the size of the organization is related to an increase in the structuring of the activities but decreased concentration of power. (Borgatti, 2001, para. 6)…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Davenport, T. H. (2009). Make Better Decisions. Harvard Business Review, 87 (11), 117-123. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays