Preview

Bus Val

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8413 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bus Val
J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 21 (2011) 55–67

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Multinational Financial
Management
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase

Factors in multinational valuations: Transparency, political risk and diversification
NyoNyo A. Kyaw ∗, John Manley, Anand Shetty
Department of Finance, Business Economics and Legal Studies, Hagan School of Business, Iona College, New Rochelle,
NY 10801, United States

article

info

Article history:
Received 5 August 2010
Accepted 14 December 2010
Available online 21 December 2010
JEL classification:
F37, G30
Keywords:
Multinationals
Valuation
Transparency
Geographic diversification
Political risk

abstract
This paper examines the role of geographic diversification, transparency, and political risk, in the determination of the value of multinational corporations (MNCs). Using alternative measures for geographic diversification, this paper finds the evidence supporting the positive effect of the degree of multinationality on the firm value. The evidence also provides support for the theories that argue that political risk and transparency have negative impact on the
MNC value.
Published by Elsevier B.V.

1. Introduction
The factors impacting the performance of multinational firms remain of much interest to managers, investors and researchers. A number of theories have been put forth and tested empirically to link the international expansion with the firm value. The internalization theory (INT) posits the idea that multinational firms can create value by internalizing the markets for key intangible assets of the firm such as marketing, managerial and production skills, patents and goodwill. For example, Malone and Rose (2006) argue that a firm’s unique intangible assets provide a competitive advantage that may be best claimed through geographic expansion. Using transaction cost theory, they argue that man-

∗ Corresponding author at: Department of



References: Alesina, A., Perotti, R., 1996. Income distribution, political instability, and investment. European Economic Review 40, 1203–1228. Allen, L., Pantzalis, C., 1996. Valuation of operating flexibility of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 27 (4), 633–653. Almazan, A., Javier, S., Sheridan, T., 2003. Stakeholders, transparency and capital structure. Working Paper 10101, National Bureau of Economic Research, November. Bennet, P.D., Green, R., 1972. Political instability as a determinant of direct foreign marketing investment. Journal of Marketing Research 9, 182–186. Bilson, C.M., Brailsford, T.J., Hooper, V.C., 2002. The explanatory power of political risk in emerging markets. International Review of Financial Analysis 11 (1), 1–27. Birkinshaw, J., Ridderstrale, J., 1999. Fighting the corporate immune system: a process study of subsidiary initiatives in multinational corporations. International Business Review 8 (2), 149–180. Bodnar, G., Tang, C., Weintrop, J., 2003. The Value of Corporate International Diversification. Working Paper, John Hopkins University. Buckley, P.J., Casson, M., 1998. Models of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies 29 (1), 21–44. Campos, N.F., Nugent, J.B., 2002. Who is afraid of political instability. Journal of Development Economics 67, 157–172. Campos, N.F., Nugent, J.B., 2003. Aggregate investment and political instability: an econometric investigation. Economica 70, 533–549. Click, R., Harrison, P., 2000. Does multinationality matter? Evidence of Value Destruction in U.S. Multinational Corporations, Working Paper 21, US Federal Reserve Board. Contractor, F., Kundu, S., Hsu, C.c., 2003. A three-stage theory of international expansion: the link between multinationality and performance in the service sector Coase, R.H., 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4, 386–405. Carmignani, F., 2003. Political instability, uncertainty, and economics. Journal of Economic Surveys 17, 1–54. Chang, S.C., Huang, P.C., 2002. Corporate multinationalism, organizational learning, and market reaction to international joint ventures: evidence from Taiwan Cho, H.J., 2003. Political Risk, Labor Standards, and Foreign Direct Investment, www document http://www.anderson.ucla. Denis, D.J., Denis, D.K., Yost, K., 2002. Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. Journal of Finance 57 (5), 1951–1979. Diamonte, R.L., Liew, J.M., Stevens, R.L., 1996. Political risk in emerging and developed markets. Financial Analysis Journal 52 (3), 71–76. N.A. Kyaw et al. / J. of Multi. Fin. Manag. 21 (2011) 55–67 67 Doukas, J., 1995. Overinvestment, Tobin’s q and gains from foreign acquisitions. Journal of Banking and Finance 19, 1285–1303. Doukas, J., Pantzalis, C., Kim, S., 1999. Intangible assets and the network structure of MNCs. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 10 (1), 1–23. Doukas, J., Travlos, N.G., 1988. The effect of corporate multinationalism on shareholders’ wealth: evidence from international acquisitions Dunning, J.H., 1980. Toward an electic theory of international production: some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies 11, 9–31. Dunning, J.H., 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: a neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies 20 (1), 45–66. Easterbrook, F., 1984. Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. American Economic Review 74, 650–659. Erb, C.B., Harvey, C.R., Viskanta, T.E., 1996. Political risk, economic risk, and financial risk. Financial Analysts Journal 52 (6), 29–46. Fielding, D., 2003. Modeling political instability and economic performance: Israeli investment during the intifada. Economica 70, 159–186. Freund, S., Trahan, E., Vasudevan, G., 2007. The effects of global and industrial diversification on firm value and operating performance Geringer, M.J., Beamish, P.W., da Costa, R.C., 1989. Diversification strategy and internationalization: implications for MNE performance Globerman, S., Shapiro, D., 2003. Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies 34, 19–39. Gomes, L., Ramaswamy, K., 1999. An empirical examination of the form of relationship between multinationality and performance. Journal of International Business Studies 30 (1), 173–188. Hennart, J.-F., 2007. The theoretical rationale for a multinationality-performance relationship. Management International Review 47 (3), 423–452. Howell, L.D., 2001. The Handbook of Country and Political Risk Analysis, 3rd ed. The PRS Group, East Syracuse, NY. Kim, W.S., Lyn, E.O., 1986. Excess market value, the multinational corporation, and Tobin’s q ratio. Journal of International Business Studies 17, 119–125. Kogut, B., Zander, Udo, 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24 (4), 625–645. Lu, J., Beamish, P., 2004. International diversification and firm performance: the S-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal 47 (4), 598–6009. Malone, C., Rose, L., 2006. Intangible assets and firm diversification. International Journal of Managerial Finance 2, 136. Mishra, Chandra S., Gobeli, David H., 1998. Managerial incentives, internationalization, and market valuation of multinational firms Morck, Randall, Yeung, Bernard, 1991. Why investors value multinationality. The Journal of Business 64 (2), 165–187. Morck, Randall, Yeung, Bernard, 1992. Internationalization: an event study test. Journal of International Economics 33, 41–56. Myers, Stuart, 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5, 146–175. Myers, S., Majluf, N., 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have Pak, Y.S., Park, Y.R., 2004. Global ownership strategy of Japanese multinational enterprises: a test of internalization theory. Pantzalis, C., 2001. Does location matter? An empirical analysis of geographic scope and MNC market valuation. Journal of International Business Studies 32 (1), 133–155. Piscitello, L., Rabbiosi, L., 2005. Knowledge transfer from foreign subsidiaries to parent companies: mechanisms and effects on competitive advantage Petersen, M., 2009. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies 22 (1), 435–480. Rugman, A.W., 1981. Inside the Multinationals: The Economics of Internal Markets. Columbia University Press, New York. Ruigrok, W., Wagner, H., 2003. Internalization and performance: an organizational learning perspective. Management International Review 43 (1), 63–83. Subrahmanyan, A., Titman, S., 1999. The going public decision and the development of financial markets. Journal of Finance 54, 1045–1082. Tallman, S., Li, J., 1996. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Tang, C., Tikoo, S., 1999. Operational flexibility and market valuation of earnings. Strategic Management Journal 20 (8), 749–761. Thompson, S., 2006. Simple Formulas for Standard Errors that cluster by Both Firm and Time, Harvard Working Paper. Vermeulen, f., Barkema, H., 2002. Pace, rhythm, and scope: process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal 23 (7), 637–654. Wolf, B.M., 1977. Industrial diversification and internationalisation: some empirical evidence. Journal of Industrial Economics 26, 177–191.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Assignment 1

    • 3095 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Smelser, N. and Baltes, P. (2014). Multinational corporations. [online] www.columbia.edu. Available at: https://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/bkogut/files/Chapter_in_smelser-Baltes_2001.pdf) [Accessed 3 Aug. 2014].…

    • 3095 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Dunning, J.H. and Lundan, S.M. (2008) Multinational enterprises and the global economy 2nd ed., Glos: Edward Elgar…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Beamish, P. W., Morrison, A. J., Inkpen, A., & Rosenzweig, P. M. (2003). International management: Text and cases (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Companies.…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Midterm Study Guide

    • 3957 Words
    • 16 Pages

    * multinational company - more than 2 countries. the market-based, cost-based, and strategic motives a firm has to expand internationally. After this, we studied how global companies exploit economies of scale, economies of scope, and national differences to achieve their three generic objectives: (1) efficiency in current operations, (2) managing risks, and (3) innovation, learning, and adaptation. We concluded by introducing the nature and complexity of the international environment of international companies. (University 20)…

    • 3957 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many theories given by different group of researchers about the existence of multinational enterprises or MNE's. According to John Cantwell, it was in the 1970's and 1980's that many theories on MNE's were proposed. These theories were either general theories of MNE's which were called the main institution for international production or the theories on foreign direct investment, the means by which international production is done ( Pitelis, Christos N. and Sugden, Roger, The nature of the Transnational firm, Pg 10). Amongst the most famous are the Hymer's theory of international production, the internalization theory put forward by Buckley and Casson, Dunning's Eclectic Paradigm, and the evolutionary theory given by Kogut and Zander. Hymer's theory is based on the assumption of market failure and market imperfection and he argues that firms internationalize to increase their market power. The internalization theory is based on transaction costs and market imperfection. Dunning's eclectic paradigm explains the nature of MNE's as to why and when firm decides internationalize or setup production abroad. Evolutionary theory is based on the knowledge and resource based view of the firm (Dr. Ramirez, Paulina, lecture 2, International Business Theories).…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marketing and Entry Mode

    • 19453 Words
    • 78 Pages

    Stuart Wall & Ronwen Rees (2001) “Introduction to International Business” Chp2, Internationalisation Process, Edit 1, Published by Pearson Education Limited…

    • 19453 Words
    • 78 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    [14] Heenan, David A.; Perlmutter, Howard V.: Multinational Organization Development, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Canada, 1979, p. 17…

    • 5322 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (2003) ‘Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation’, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6), pp. 516-529.…

    • 3807 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: 1) Ansoff, I. (1957), “Strategies for Diversification”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 35 Issue 5, Sep-Oct 1957, pp. 113-124…

    • 3505 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Edwards P and Bélanger J (2009) The MNC as a contested terrain. In: Collinson S and Morgan G (eds) The Multinational Firm. Oxford: Wiley, 193-216.…

    • 11971 Words
    • 48 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ford Motor Case Study

    • 5723 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Ansoff, H. Igor. “A Model for Diversification” Management Science. Vol. 4. No. 4. INFORMS. 1958. pp394-395.…

    • 5723 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When thinking about internationalization, a lot of people instantly associate it with multinational companies. It cannot be said that they are wrong; however, internationalization is a far more complex phenomena as it does not only consist of companies setting their headquarters outside the borderlines of the countries of origin. If an entity simply decides to import or export commodities or services, their action can also be described as ‘going international’; producing effects both domestically and internationally. In recent years, the number of companies that chose to get involved in international business operations and transactions increased substantially to the point where becoming visible in the world market became very difficult. When operating internationally, a company should consider its mission (what it will seek to do and become over the years; what is the purpose of the company’s existence); its objectives (what is the company trying to accomplish according to its mission); and strategies (means to achieve its objectives).The main reasons for the increased number of companies that want to go international are the following:…

    • 1981 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Global Remittances

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Eiteman, D. K., Stonehill, A. I., & Moffett, M. H. (2013). Multinational Business Finance. Essex: Pearson.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Corea Y La Crisis Mundial

    • 9361 Words
    • 38 Pages

    Jungmin Kim* Ph.D. Candidate International Business and Strategy College of Business Administration Seoul National University jungmin2@snu.ac.kr…

    • 9361 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shapiro, A. C. (1978). Financial Structure and cost of capital in the multinational corporation. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 13(2), 211-226…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays