This article reports about the case filed by Anastassia Zissis suing McDonald’s after the slip on at the back of the Myer Centre. Anastassia Zissis injured due to slip on liquid that been spilled in an access passage. These gave rise to different areas of law such as:
Contract Law
According to Lambiris (2012), the Contract Law is the law about private agreement that give rise to enforceable responsibilities and rights legally. In this case there are many aspects relate to contract law. For instance, the Anastassia Zissis should have been employed under the contract law with McDonald’s. The McDonald’s also have a contract with the company’s Myer Centre which means that the centre provide the space to McDonald’s to run their business while the McDonald’s must follow the rules of the centre’s management and should also take the responsibilities for centre. The detailed rights and duties were created by contract.
Tort Law
Tort law is the rules of liability for harm caused by one person to another or other’s property (Lambiris, 2012). There is a perspective in this case which related to Tort Law. Anastassia Zissis slipped and injured her neck, lower back buttocks and has also suffered headaches and psychological injuries which have effeced her ability to lead a normal life and return to full employment. Howeve it is not caused by one person, it claim that the main reason that Anastassia Zissis slipped is caused by the poor manage and bad system of the McDonald’s. As a result, the company should take the responsibility for her harms.
Corporations Law
McDonald’s as well as Myer Centre is a corporation. The creation, organisation and administration of their business are issues of corporations law (Lambiris, 2012). As a centre, Myer should have a good organization on their business because there are so many companies in the centre which ask the centre should provide a completed system to