Preview

Business Law Case Analysis Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
730 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Law Case Analysis Essay
CHAPTER ONE

SUMMARY: A new state law mandates that all employers must prohibit smoking on employer premises, and is responsible to enforce this law whether it be an employee, customer or client smoking the employer is always required to enforce the law that no one can smoke there.

ANALYSIS/ PERSONAL COMMENTARY: This is substantive law as it is defining the liability that the employer has to keep employees/clients/customers from smoking on the premises of their place of business. And I think the fact that the employer will get a court order requiring them to enforce the law is a smart step to ensure that the law will be followed more strictly.

Responded to: one, two, THREE WOOO

CHAPTER TWO

SUMMARY: After discovery in a court case about breach of contract, one side wants to file a motion to have the judge rule in her favor without proceeding any longer. Is the motion to dismiss or the motion for a summary proper for this situation?

ANALYSIS: Since a motion to dismiss is a pleading that may be filed to attack the adverse party’s pleading as not stating a cause of action or defense, that is not the proper motion to file as she is want the judge to rule in her favor, but this motion would simply be dismissed. So the proper motion to file would be the motion for a summary judgment, which by definition is; request that the court decide a case on basis of law only because there are no material issues disputed by the parties. This is true for this case as it is about a breach of contract, so there is no argument about whether or not the contract is valid, they both agree they entered but they are disputing on a specific part of it and they need a judge to make the decision on who is correct.

RESPONDed to: one,

CHAPTER THREE

SUMMARY: Sally is being charged with criminal violations of various environmental protection statutes for her large manufacturing firm that operates near a federal land preserve known for its waterfowl and fauna. What rights

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ISSUES: The court granted the motion, finding that the parties did not enter into a valid enforceable contract because (1) a material term of the alleged agreement was for Drew to pay a monetary price for the business (2) the parties never reached an…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Final Essay

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When asked “what can Moon, Inc do to get its money from Bob Zimmerman?” I would address it by saying if Zimmerman doesn’t pay off what he owes then according to the mortgage contract Zimmerman would foreclose his house and Moon, Inc. would have the right to bid first. My reasoning is that initially the mortgage was taken out for the house and Zimmerman paid back loans toward the bank. If Zimmerman doesn’t pay then the house is foreclosed and the bank gets the right to bid first on credit bid. Now the mortgage for the house belongs to Moon, Inc. and Zimmerman pays back loans to Moon, Inc. Since Zimmerman has stopped paying his mortgage that means that when the house gets foreclosed Moon, Inc. would have the right to bid first on credit bid.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary Judgment Standard of Review As stated previously, summary judgment is appropriate when the moving party shows, based on the discovery and disclosure materials on file, and any affidavits, “that there are no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law”. Mass. R. Civ. P. 56 (a). The defendants, as the moving parties, “have the burden of establishing that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case being observed here was that of Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O 'Malley 's Tavern, case # 82A04-8876-CV-285. This was brought before a mock U.S. District Court panel of judges, in the Northern District of Indiana. The Plaintiff being Deborah White, and the Defendant being Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The Plaintiffs’ Attorneys are Amanda Babbit and Jakson Walsh and the attorneys for the defendant are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter. In this case the defendant’s attorneys are seeking a summary Judgment for their client. This is a kind of resolution that would allow for them to avoid going to trial only if the Judge sees fit to deem that there are no disputes to the material facts of this case. And on the opposing side the Plaintiff Deborah white is requesting that the courts deny the defendants request for summary judgment.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The background of this lawsuit is based on Debbie White suing Patrick Gibbs and his Tavern for the death of her husband . The reason why Debbie wants the bar to be held responsible is due to the fact that Mr. Edward Hard left intoxicated and crashed into Mrs. White 's car and killed her husband . The Gibbs feel his bar shouldn’t be held responsible due to the fact that the bartender didn’t see Mr. Hard intoxicated. Mr. Hard was also an ex-boyfriend of Debbie 's and the bar feels that the accident was intentional. Mr. Gibbs wants the court to dismiss the case based on summary judgment which is “a judgment requested by any party to a civil action to end the action when it is believed that there is no genuine issue or material fact in dispute” (Mosby’s Dictionary).…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The defendants are filing a Motion of Summary Judgment to resolve the lawsuit in their favor, whereas the plaintiff does not want the Motion of Summary Judgment granted and the lawsuit to go to trial with jury to recover damages from the defendants.…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    B. Under the terms of the contract, the Petroleum Corporation agreed either to sell and…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    litigation assignment 5

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Court of Appeals of North Carolina dismissed the claim upon the merits of failure to state claim upon relief in absence of a contrary specification in the order of dismissal of the plantiffs complaint.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. That this action be dismissed, and if it is not dismissed that a Family Mediation Conference and Order for Mediation. Documents are supported by Exhibit A.…

    • 434 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Let me briefly explain a bit farther my thoughts concerning this subject. Smoking is not inherently wrong, one has the right to smoke but when that right to smoke can adversely affect another especially their health then it should be controlled. Understandable, employees that work in a bar inherently take on reasonable risks in the performance of their duties, but should they be needlessly subjected to cancer causing agents like tobacco and second hand smoke? I say…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Courtroom Observation Paper

    • 2729 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Appellant’s lawyers filed this Motion for Summary Judgment asking the Court to dismiss the lawsuit filed by the Appellee based on the fact that there is evidence which shows that the “the defendant’s had no actual knowledge of visible intoxication” by Mr. Edward Hard, Mrs. Whites former fiancée. This would be the standard required in order for the plaintiff to recover under Indiana Law (Ind. Code Ann. § 7.1-5-10-15.5). Furthermore, they stated that the act of crashing into the White’s car was not the “proximate cause” of the injuries to the plaintiff and the death of her husband but rather the result of a criminal act by Mr. Hard. The defendants believe there are no disputes of the material facts in the case and ask that the Court grant their motion…

    • 2729 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sandra Jones

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    5. The issues that the court had to decide is whether the motion judge erred by granting summary judgment and dismissing Jones claim for damages on the ground that Ontario law does not recognize the tort of beach of primacy.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If smoking is allowed in public places then the freedom of the non smoker is taken away. If we don’t allow smoking in public places then the smoker’s freedom is then restricted. Therefore banning smoking is a decision between the health of a whole nation versus the freedom of a minority. Which is more important? The millions of people that die from second hand smoke or the smoker who always has that cup of coffee and a quick smoke during their lunch break. It is not fair that the non smokers choose not to smoke by but in public he or she has no choice when it comes to smoking because of second hand smoke. Therefore the Louisiana Government should ban smoking in public places.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the banning of smoking breaks article, employers are becoming increasingly aware of the severe health issues related to smoking and the impact of smoking on job performance, absenteeism, and the rising cost of insurance health care benefits. It is not uncommon to see an employer refuse to offer a job to a candidate that admits to smoking. Those employees whom smoke are given the opportunity to seek nicotine replacement therapy for quitting and this is routinely covered by most health insurance. There are also numerous public health organizations assisting with smoking cessation.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discrimination On Smokers

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moreover, smokers also have their own protection law. In the United States Smoker Protection Laws are state statutes that prevent employers from discriminating against employees for using tobacco products. So this shows that there are not many discrimination against smokers. Although employers can keep their workplace, smoke free, they can’t stop their workers form smoking during their free time.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays