Preview

Business Law Ch 5 Hw

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1781 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Law Ch 5 Hw
1. Assume that the state of Ohio passed a hazardous waste statute, seeking to protect the general public and workers. The state statute did not violate the Commerce Clause because it imposed no restriction on interstate commerce. Both the state statute and the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) established job safety standards and specified worker training and employer licensing, but the requirements differed. Which statute(s) Ohio corporations had to obey? Pick the best ANALYSISwer. a. Ohio corporations must obey all state statutes | | b. Ohio corporations must obey OSHA’s statute and Ohio’s hazardous waste statute | | **c. If there is a conflict between a state statute and a federal statute, the federal statute will win and the state statute will be void. | | d. None of the above is true. | |

2. The Equal Protection Clause, which states that governments must treat people equally, is part of which Amendment? a. The Second Amendment | | b. The Fifth Amendment | | **c. The Fourteenth Amendment | | d. The First Amendment | |

3. Article I of the Constitution created _______ and Article II created _______. **a. the Congress, the Presidency. | | b. the Judiciary, the Congress. | | c. the Presidency, the Congress. | | d. The Presidency, the Judiciary. | | |

4. According to Texas v. Johnson, flag burning is an example of _________, protected by the ____________. **a. symbolic speech, First Amendment. | | b. pure speech, Fifth Amendment. | | c. symbolic speech, Fifth Amendment. | | d. pure speech, First Amendment. | | |

5. Andrew is at work and begins to throw a fit because the copy machine is jammed again. In this outrage, Andrew was screaming out profanity. The company fired him stating that the employee handbook gives using profanity as a reason for immediate termination. Andrew claims that the company is violating his first amendment rights of freedom of speech. Is Andrew correct that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Ch11-15

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dorris Reed, the plaintiff, purchased a home from Robert King. Robert King and his real estate agent did not tell Dorris Reed that a woman and her four children were murdered 10 years ago, because the murder would affect the value of the home. Dorris Reed, however, did find out about the murder from a neighbor and sued Robert King and his real estate agent for rescission and damages. Dorris Reed paid $76,000 for the home but the value of the house, once the murder was taken into consideration, was only worth $65,000. Due to Dorris Reed failing to state a cause of action, the trial court sided with Robert King and his real estate agent. Dorris Reed appealed. Fraud is being looked at in the case of Reed vs. King. There are five elements to proving fraud, 1) material misrepresentation, 2) facts/knowledge, 3) intent, 4) reliance, and 5) damage (quoted from text book). Robert King and his real estate agent hid the first and second element of fraud. They knew about the murders and did not present Dorris Reed with this information, which would have affected Dorris Reed decision to buy the house. However, when dealing with the selling of real property, the question of materially is the main issue. Materiality is based on three conditions, 1) the gravity of the harm inflicted by nondisclosure, 2) the fairness of imposing a duty of discovery on the buyer as an alternative to compelling disclosure, and 3) the impact on the stability of contracts if rescission is permitted (citation from text book). Even though murder is horrible and it would affect a person’s judgment on buying that particulate house, there is no evidence to support Dorris Reed claim that the murder would in fact affect the market value of the house. The judgment was later reversed because Dorris Reed was able to present enough evidence to show that history can affect the value of property.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business law Ch 4

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    17-3. Daniel is not liable for the debt Rubya defaulted on. The contract did not make Rubya a partner, even those she was given profit sharing and management responsibilities, she did not poses any ownership of the business. Also under UPA 202(c)(3) no presumption of partnership is made since the profits are wages of an employee or for the services of an independent contractor. Not to mention Daniel did not have any knowledge of the credit extended to Rubya.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This midterm examination is open book, open notes, but you are on the honor system not to seek assistance from anyone to complete this exam. There are 25 multiple choice questions worth 2 points each and 10 essay questions worth 5 points each, for a total of 100 points. Answer all the questions because for the essays partial credit is given where appropriate. Just submit the question number and your answer. Please do not submit the entire exam with questions and your answers because it will take up too much memory and it will take too much time to grade the exams. So delete everything but the question number and your answer (i.e. “1.c”) and submit to the Assignments section of WT no later than 9pm March 17. 5 point penalty for each day late.…

    • 3816 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    a. What issue was address in the US Supreme Court cases of Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims and what phrase did they use to justify their decision? (523-24)…

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    9. What distinction does the Court make between the cases of Tinker v. Des Moines and Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Now look at Question 2 (p. 71) and pick either b, c, or d to answer. Explain your answer using legal terms and concepts from this week's readings.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ISSUE: State statues definition of “marriage” -limiting it to man & woman. Unconstitutional as it bars equal protection…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4. Which of the following is not true regarding Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Quiz Chapter 1

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Congress has the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among stated. True Page 107…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Week 5

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Our team learned this week how to differentiate between types of discriminatory issues and knowing the legal considerations linked to it. This knowledge proved to be beneficial in the team’s decision on how to tackle option one of this week’s team reflection exercise. As a senior manager of a prominent security company, it is important that I look out for the company’s integrity in maintaining its mission of maintaining order, protecting property and the use of deadly force. One of our employees, Joe who recently returned from a successful two years boots in ground deployment in Afghanistan is suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). His mental health provider made this diagnosis along with depression, anxiety, and anger issues. As the senior person in-charge of Joe, I have to make a tough decision whether to recommend if Joe should remain in or resign from the company.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Constitutional Law Ii - Outline

    • 43575 Words
    • 175 Pages

    b. State action is a threshold issue. If there is no state action, the 14th am doesn’t apply.…

    • 43575 Words
    • 175 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    short answers

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Following to the US Constitution reserves to the states all rules do not decide to the federal government. Each state in the union has own constitution and laws. With this case, Jen is not belonging to in interstate commerce, Jen’s activities were not belonging to Federal law. Jen’s activities belong to the state law.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crim Justice

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    6. Which Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is concerned with the defendant’s right to a jury trial?…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    My Personal Manifesto

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages

    7. The law of the land is to be subject to the Constitution as it was originally intended by those who wrote it.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is paraphrasing"? Can anyone give me an example. Thanks in advance for your time. :0)?…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays