Adam Smith: YES
Smith argues, ”If we will but leave self-interested people to seek their own advantage, the result, unintended by any one of them, will be the greater advantage of all. No government interference is necessary to protect the general welfare.”
Smith supports his argument by explaining, what most people consider the “American Dream”. He is very detailed in describing the process of developing wealth through manufacturing goods and services. He covers the division of labor, explaining that a manufacture owner employs a small number of the population to work to deliver the demands of the greater population. Each division of the manufacturing process conducts specified duties and tasks to create a part of the manufacturing process. The manufacturing process includes both skilled and unskilled labor. By dividing labor and creating specialized areas of the process increases the quantity of output within a shorter time period. As the process is further separated, so is the compensation, which creates a great division of class. The invention of machines has allowed one man to complete the task of many workers. The manufacturing process also creates multiple opportunities for other manufacturing owners to create an item or fixture to be utilized in the manufacturing of the main product.
Considering this type of work environment will create a difference in class. The highest class will be the wealthiest, the private owner. The owner would employ all the other classes and level of wealth will be determined by position and compensation, the poorest being the worker the least compensated. The goal is to make as much of a profit as possible to live the life desired.
Without governmental influence, this creates an opportunity for any person to achieve their personal monetary goal. Therefore, making earnings limitless and allow individuals to be in control of their own happiness. Maximizing earnings is always considered, leading to outsourcing from foreign companies at an inexpensive rate that which can be home-produced. “… Every individual naturally inclines to employ his capital in the manner in which it is likely to afford the greatest support to domestic industry, and to give revenue and employment to the greatest number of people of his own country.”
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels: NO
Marx and Engels are in great support of communism. They explain that if you “leave people to their own self-interested devices, and those who by luck and inheritance own the means of production will rapidly reduce everyone else to virtual slavery.” Communism eliminates the divisions of class in society created by capitalism, by allowing the government to control everything.
Marx and Engels argue that capitalism will increasingly create a great divide causing the wealthy to be wealthier and make the middle class and lower class get poorer until eventually there is no middle class, just a great division between two classes, whereas, communism will create a balance and eliminate all classes.
A communist society focuses more on balancing and sharing the wealth to ensure everyone is equally treated and capitalism focuses on individual wealth and success and leave the rest of society to continuously struggle and get left behind. Marx and Engels that the growing competition will cause the workers to form unions to fight for wages; become rebellious and cause riots. The bourgeois will continue to succeed as the proletarians continue to struggle.
Marx and Engels believe communism is the best way to go because it focuses on the way wealth is shared to ensure the happiness of society. Capitalism focuses on the development of individual growth and happiness. Questions
What is your opinion on this article?
Do you think that Marx and Engels are correct in their portrayal of capitalism?
How are the effects of capitalism affecting us today?
Do you think capitalism has led to human happiness?
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Adam Smith, in his book The Wealth of Nations, wrote about the idea that production of wealth would increase if people pursued their self-interest in 1776, just before the Industrial Revolution took off. He went on to describe the division of labor, that is breaking the manufacturing of a product into several easier tasks to be done by separate people, commonly called an assembly line. The Industrial Revolution brought to life Smith 's ideas of division of labor and economic individualism with unrestrained competition, essentially birthing capitalism…
- 700 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
One of the greatest issues with the idea that most people are motivated to act in their own best interest is that it presents a difficulty when trying to promote economic development. This often has negative effects on prices and on the environment. A thriving economy, certain factors are necessary:…
- 553 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The success of a society is reliant on individual sacrifice. Ambitions driven by selfishness are detrimental to a community. Numerous instances of human history and literature have demonstrated the importance of limiting self-interest.…
- 314 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
11. What kind of individuals do you think Smith is targeting when he says, "Who can desire more content, that has small means or but only his merit to advance his fortune, than to tread and plant that ground he has purchased by the hazard of his life?" The Common Man…
- 1551 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Smith's theory coincided with a long-developing American tradition of individualism and opposition to government interference. America, not Britain, would be the great testing ground of Adam Smith's ideas (Miller and Masur). The industrial revolution was characterized by a technological revolution and a commercial revolution fueled by economic individualism and unrestricted competition. The lower class was transitioning from farm lands to a more secure job in a factory. Despite the terrifying wages and labor conditions, America would gradually improve. Adam Smith in “Theory of Moral Sentiments,” argues humans are social creatures and that poverty causes unfavorable regard. This industrial boom allowed the poverty-stricken to find a job and reestablish that love/belonging stage in their life. It could be argued this led to the beginning of the creation of the middle class, reshaping the haves and have-nots. Private investments and loans enabled inventors and scientists to develop these new technological advancements at expediting rates. Without capital from wealthy investors, many inventions would have not occurred due to insufficient funding, which was required to create their vision. Along with the importance of the creation of these inventions, the jobs that followed producing these goods were just as important, this best exemplifies Smith’s invisible…
- 1553 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
We can see that through the division and specialization of labour that Adam Smith’s pin factory is an example of a cottage industry transforming into a modern organization at the beginning of the industrial revolution. The pin factory could be viewed as a cottage industry due to the fact that it’s a small, loosely organized, yet flourishing complex of industry. We can also see the pin factory as a modern organization (at the beginning of the industrial revolution) due to the division of labour/roles throughout its ten workers. Each man has a specific task(s) dedicated to the creation of the pin and though the factory was very poor, when they worked hard, they could make upwards of forty-eight thousand pins a day. “Each person, therefore, making a tenth part of forty-eight thousand pins, might be considered as making four thousand eight hundred pins in a day. But if they had all wrought separately and independently, and without any of them having been educated to this peculiar business, they certainly could not each of them have made twenty, perhaps not one pin in a day” (Wealth of Nations, Smith, 1776) This shows that in order for the pin factory to obtain an effective method of output, there must be a form of division and specialization of labour which leads to Horizontal differentiation. This occurs through the organization…
- 1119 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
for a career, the way we eat or drink to conclude, the way we live.…
- 1819 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
He concludes that an economically self-interest society is lopsided and when relegated to government it becomes too complex. He feels that private owners need to be ethically logical to the land.…
- 1137 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In her 1964 book Virtue of Selfishness, Ayn Rand mentioned that her ideal form of capitalism is one which is “a full, pure, uncontrolled, unregulated laissez-faire capitalism—with a separation of state and economics.” Indeed, this Objectivism viewpoint has been used by many conservative policy makers, such as Malcolm Fraiser , the former Prime Minister of Australia, and esteemed economists such as Alan Greenspan and Martin Anderson to craft policies that reduces the intervention of the government, thereby allowing individuals more freedom to pursue their economic interests. There have been many debates about the rights and the wrongs of these policies, and this essay seeks to discuss if individuals should be free to pursue their economic…
- 1408 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
“The only proper role of government in the economic realm is to protect property rights, adjudicate disputes, and provide a legal framework in which voluntary trade is protected. All efforts by government to redistribute wealth, or to control or manage trade, are improper in a free society…
- 549 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In fact, this self-interested, free market approach may result in even better outcomes than even utilitarian altruism. Smith argues that “by pursuing [one’s] own interest, [one] frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it” (PPE 164-172). In other words: in the framework of our analogy, the self-interested voter frequently produces better political outcomes than voters with social welfare in…
- 604 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
During the early nineteenth century, both China and Japan enforced policies restricting foreign trade in order to avoid industrialization and western ideas, but after both societies experienced foreign invasions and unequal treaties being established by foreigners, Japan began to industrialize and became imperialists trying to create an empire, while China differed in that the people wanted reform and government restrained the reformation of their society, therefore causing multiple rebellions and overall the collapse of their empire.…
- 1028 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Capitalism is an economic system in which the means of production are owned privately. Business organization produces goods for a market dominated by the force of supply and demand. It is a free market system ruled by competition. The problem is: it doesn’t work. History shows that it has collapse many times. We had 2 in great depressions the 1930’s and 2008 isn’t it coincidence? But the two events don’t really prove that it doesn’t work. Still, half the country worships the concept of a free market economy, refusing to see what is plain to see: Capitalism is seriously flawed. As the Occupy Movement people point out, it is deliriously wonderful for about 1% of the population who own about 25% of the national wealth. It is the other 99% who suffer as Marcus Baram stated in his article. The question we should be asking ourselves is why doesn’t Capitalism work for everyone? It’s because capitalism is out of control. The bankers control U.S. monetary policy.…
- 668 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
While we as a nation have been seriously struggling through the economic crisis since the latest crash in 2007 that brought our economy to the brink of disaster there has been, to say the least, a bitter, partisan battle between the left and the right, the Republicans and the Democrats, the Tea Party and the recently named 99 percenters. The division is sharp an reasonably precise to the point that you are on one side or the other unless you can walk a razor blade with bare feet which represents the middle. Each group has taken up its position behind a barrier of rhetoric and dug itself in a trench refusing to move at any cost. There is no one with any degree of strength who can step into the middle and demand that reasoned minds must prevail and be listened to or followed by enough people from the other groups to make any difference whatsoever. Thus it seems that the great experiment that is just a little more than 200 years old is on the brink of failure. What has brought us to this point in time in this situation that the beliefs of men such as Jefferson, Madison, Locke and Voltaire were wrong and that the beliefs of Karl Marx were closer to what the real outcome. Trying to put on my social scientist hat and step back for an objective look at the rise and potential fall of a great nation I thought I would try to narrow down some basic issues regarding the issues of human behavior to look at our failures.…
- 1281 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
What is happiness? It is just one word, but every person has his own view on this question. Happiness is a basic of nature. Somebody think that it is God’s gift or result of luck, but some people claim that happiness is in your hands, you do it by yourself, you have to achieve your aims to be happy. Some people confuse happiness to pleasure, pleasure is a drink of water in the hot day, a comfortable bed after difficult day, but the happiness is absolutely another. The traveler is happy when he reached a peak of mountain, but he is not pleased, because he knows that in future he has to go down. The pleasure is a result, the happiness is a way. Although, many scientists tried to find the answer on this question but they have many disagreements. But why many people think that economic growth can bring greater happiness for humans?…
- 842 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays