Preview

Can Science Explain Everything?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2635 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Can Science Explain Everything?
Can Science Explain Everything? There are many facts today that are known to be true that science hasn’t been able to account for. Scientists are still very active in their search to prove some of the puzzling questions that remain unanswered. In Elliot Sober’s work, Can Science Explain Everything, he addresses that controversial question. Sober thesis claims to prove that when science attempts to explain events, and does so by describing its causes, it will never find answers to global why-questions. Sober believes that it is reasonable to accept that at this point in time we don’t have all the answers, but we eventually will have an answer backed by scientific explanation. Elliot Sober addresses to main questions: (1) Are there any facts about the world that science is inherently incapable of explaining? (2) If there are, can we plausibly argue that the best explanation of why those facts are true is that God exists? To answer the first question, Sober argues that, the questions science has failed to answer aren’t because they haven’t found an explanation yet, it’s the nature of scientific explanation that prevents an answer from ever being found. Science either aims to answer questions about a generalization, or to explain a particular event. True generalizations describe what is true in all places and times, such as a chemist’s question of why hydrogen and oxygen combine to form a water molecule. An event, however, happens at a certain time and place; events either happen or fail to happen. Science aims to explain an event by looking at what preceded it; a habit that creates a chain of events, with an infinite number of links, which extends back into the past. Sober’s thesis about explanation states that when science attempts to explain a certain event they must look to at what occurred in the neighboring place and time. By looking at what precluded it you can find reasoning that can be cited as an explanation of why the spatiotemporal event


Cited: work: Kelly, Kevin. Edge- Speculations on the Future of Science. Online. Internet. 2006 John Brockman, Editor and Publisher. Russell Weinberger, Associate Publisher. URL: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/kelly06/kelly06_index.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Knowledge, the key to progress, has proven to be a human being’s most powerful and significant weapon. We gain knowledge when we put our brain to work at the problems we need to solve in life. It doesn’t matter what we are trying to accomplish, whether it be creating a new technology or learning how to put together a puzzle, the matter of fact is that both request great examination and research to resolve and learn. Scientific research is a technique used to investigate phenomena, correct previous understanding, and acquire new knowledge. Knowledge could lead us to a possible cure for cancer, an alternative for fossil fuels, and the creation of a revolutionary technology. Nevertheless, all these benefits are a reason why John M. Barry writes about scientific research with admiration, curiosity, and passion in which he blends a use of rhetorical strategies in order to give off an overall perspective of the necessity and mystery within scientific research.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He states that questions unanswered have scientific answers behind them, and mythological answers were simply ways to understand things they did not understand before science became as advanced as it is now.…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a passage where the authors used a boiling kettle as an analogy to the universe. The authors reasoned that there were two explanations to the question, “Why is the kettle boiling?” One being a scientific explanation, another being a personal explanation. The authors then concluded that the same applied to the universe. Since nothing came before the first state of the universe, no scientific explanation is possible because no set laws were in place to explain…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    black sheep

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There’s many questions that scientist are currently addressing and many they will never be able to answer because of individual opinions and no evidence between any of the answers clearly because you can’t experiment any of it. For example in our modern day society there’s always debates on whether there’s a God or not? Around the world there’s many atheist that believe there is no such thing as God and there is no life after death. This is a question science wouldn’t be able to answer nor prove to us. They only way that would be possible is if someone died experienced the life after death and then resurrected and told us what happened, but clearly we know that’s impossible and will never happen!…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    April: An explanatory cause is the assumption that every event in the universe including our own actions, can be explained and understood.(Solomon,2010)…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the dawn of time, we as humans have been attempting to explain and identify events and phenomena which we have experienced. Many of these events such as the creation of the Earth and its different species have been virtually unexplainable due to a lack of knowledge and information. As a result, humans, from confusion and curiosity, developed theories and ideas attempting to explain what could not originally be…

    • 2712 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scientific Breakthroughs

    • 2604 Words
    • 11 Pages

    ABSTRACT: In order to understand the rationality of scientific creation, we must first clarify the following: (1) the historical structure of scientific creation from starting point to breakthrough, and then to establishment; (2) the process from the primary through the productive aspects of the scientific problem, the idea of creation, the primary conjecture, the scientific hypothesis, and finally the emergence of the genetic structure establishing the theory; and (3) the problem threshold of rationality in scientific creation. Given that the theory of scientific creation adopts the descriptive viewpoint of rationality, it therefore establishes rational principles such as the following: (1) a superlogical mode of thinking; (2) an analysable genetic structure which consists of the primary and productive aspects (including experiential facts, background theory, operational means, higher irrational factors, etc.); (3) a means of recourse to the effect of incubation of a higher idea; (4) a movement in thinking from generality to particularity; and (5) the replacement of irrational by rational factors.…

    • 2604 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosopher Rene Descartes believed in mechanism, a theory holding that organisms are machines in the sense that they are material systems, therefore explains biological processes, within the framework of science. In order to discover a fundamental set of principles that is “based ultimately on the universal laws of mathematical physics that governed the behavior of all natural phenomena, celestial and terrestrial alike,” (6) Descartes banish teleology (any system attempting to explain a series of events in terms of ends, goals, or purposes) from science. He believed in order to conceive this unified theory there was no room for purposiveness, and since this universal law was made of mathematical physics, “there was no attainable answer to the question why” (6). But Cottingham thinks if we were to achieve and complete a [super-theory linking gravity and quantum physics] together to answer the ultimate question, we still would [fall short of explaining why there should be a universe at all]. Cottingham’s belief is acceptable because if this super-theory was completed, that included all observable phenomena in the universe, this theory still would not answer the question to “why is it so.” This is where science has reached its…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, one needs to understand that no serious scientific discussion of any topic should include supernatural explanations, since the basic assumption of science is that the world can be explained entirely in physical terms.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He continues by addressing how pure natural science is possible. For the study of nature, metaphysics, to be considered a science, our experiences must follow necessary and universal laws. In terms of causality, “a judgment of observation can never rank as experience, without the law, that ‘whenever an event is observed, it is always referred to some antecedent, which it follows according to a universal law,” (53). Thus, per universal law, when an event is observed to happen, it must be connected to some earlier event that is…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever heard of the horizon problem? Ultra-energetic rays? Maybe even dark matter? These are just a few of the unexplainable modern scientific anomalies we desperately want to understand. You could call them the great mysteries of the universe. Almost a decade ago, these mysterious were yet to even be discovered, but our lust for the unknown fueled our search to answer the many questions of nature; leading us to many profound discoveries. As with all discoveries there is new knowledge, but with that knowledge comes more questions and understanding that becomes the new standard. The attitude expressed by Lewis Thomas in, Humanities and Science, of which I am in agreement with, states that sciences strongest aspects are a desire to understand the unknown without simultaneously losing the fun of discovery, but I refute that human ignorance is the root of how scientific material is improperly taught.…

    • 858 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Popper presents a way of perceiving science that is appealing for a number of reasons, he argued a few simple and outstanding claims with which he attempted to revolutionize the way we see and practice science. In the chapter, Popper, Conjecture and Refutation, Goddfrey communicates the basic ideas that set Popper apart from other philosophers of science, and explains how his theories are still important half a century after their conception. I will first outline the components of Poppers theory, and then continue to summarize the known objections to his theories. It will then…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We live in a physical wold, and therefore to know something about the world requires some empirical work, in this sense, science has something to say, and it might be claimed that science could help to determine…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humans often feel the fundamental oddity to find and give an explanation for everything around them. Some people would say ‘that it’s in our blood’. Others say that this characteristic separates humans from the rest of the animal kingdom. Our ability to ‘explain’ events, clauses, ideas and items gives us the capability to contemplate occurrences to bring different areas of knowledge into a higher and ample stature. In these areas of knowledge that we acquire through the process of explanation a sundry of definitions emerge. For in every area of knowledge, there is a dissimilar definition of ‘explain’ than the one before. This is because of the different ways that the explanation is acquired. In the common usage of ‘explain’, it is defined as “to make known in detail or to make clear the cause or reason of; account for”. This is the base meaning that additional areas of knowledge build their own altered definition from.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Snow: A Short Story

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As I sit on my couch watching the snow furiously fall from the sky, my mind wanders to a time where science could be the only reason and not be judged or questioned about it. As I thought about this I randomly exclaimed to my good friend, “If you think about it science is the only logical explanation for everything that happens, take the snow that is falling outside for example, it is falling because the weather dictated it fall from the sky.” My friend retorted, “Yes, but couldn’t there be a greater figure out there above the clouds making it snow.” I shot back “No, snow is just frozen water, that froze as it fell in the form of rain. Scientists have proved that a long time ago, as water evaporates it turns to clouds and once that cools down it falls as rain, and if it is cold enough it will freeze into snowflakes.” To this he replied, “Well I don’t think that is…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics