What this means is that prior to the entrenchment of the Charter into the Canadian Constitution, studies indicate that gay and lesbian advocates did not believe that "legal and public policy changes [were] likely to occur" (Smith, 2005, p.334) through litigation. This is because pre-Charter courts could not influence public policies. In fact, when it comes to questioning government legislations, the courts only had jurisdiction over a limited amount of issues such as the division of power between federal and provincial government (Smith, …show more content…
To be premise. the Charter actually did not make an immediate impact on the movement (Smith 2005) which is reasonable given the complexity of the Charter and the Canadian legal system. However, once the activists gained enough understanding of the Charter, it resulted in new litigation opportunities. (Smith, 2005). This is because the Charter allows the courts to strike down, read-in, or request the government to change any government policies and laws that the courts deem unconstitutional (Boyd, 2011). Knowing this, activists change their strategy from focusing on the negative stigma of being homosexual to centering their movement around the Charter (Smith, 2005), essentially using the Charter as a tool to attack certain discriminatory laws and policies or to protect their rights from intrusive government