According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, everyone has the inalienable right to life1. It is a clear breach of this right if the death penalty is used. This right cannot be forfeited even by committing a crime. The death penalty only serves the purpose of revenge, not justice. The relatives of criminals do not usually support the death penalty because they 'know' the person and circumstances and feel that it is not warranted. The death penalty is more likely to be supported by the victims of crime who go by the "eye for an eye" ideology of revenge. However, the purpose of the legal system is not to deal out revenge, but justice. The death penalty is just state-sanctioned murder and revenge.
Every human has the right "to not be tortured or subject to any, cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment."2 Yet methods of capital punishment such as stoning, lethal injection and electrocution, are painful and slow, and can be classified as torture. They are also inhumane; in Vietnam and China, prisoners are faced with the humiliation of being executed by firing squad in front of the public and their relatives are not told until after the execution. In Iran, adultery is met with execution by stoning. It is a cruel exercise in which "...the stones should not be too large so that the person dies on being hit by one or two of them; they should not be so small either that they could not be defined as stones."3
Capital punishment violates human rights because as they are created by humans, all legal systems are fallible. It is extremely unwise to have the death penalty because there is always the possibility of error. It is unacceptable that even one innocent person could be executed. Where the presumption of innocence holds true, a guilty man walking free should be preferred to an innocent man being wrongfully convicted. Since 1973, 122 death-row prisoners in America have been released due to evidence proving their innocence. In Vietnam the trial process does not meet international standards. In both China and Vietnam court processes are corrupt, unfair and are often interfered with by politicians who want death sentences to achieve certain outcomes. Despite the existence of the International Right that "every law shall prohibit ... discrimination on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, opinion, origin, property, birth or other status"4, the death penalty is unfair as it is disproportionately administered. China has used the death penalty to suppress minority religions and activists. The poor in many countries are disadvantaged as they have insufficient money to afford good legal representation, if any at all. In Arabic countries, women are executed for crimes like adultery that do not demand execution for men.
The death penalty does not give criminals the opportunity to redeem themselves or get rehabilitated. Whatever the crime, the criminal should be given a chance to lead a normal life after their sentence has been served. Stanley Williams, in the US, was convicted of the murder of four people and was sent to death row. While in prison, although he maintained his innocence, he saw the errors in his way of life, wrote books and was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. Nevertheless, he was not granted clemency and was executed. This person made a genuine attempt to redeem himself but was executed anyway. What was the point in Williams changing for the better when he was still going to be executed? The death penalty should be abolished because criminals in death row are not even encouraged to change their behaviour for their own moral benefit let alone for the rest of society. In Singapore, drug trafficking is a capital offence, and recently, Mr Van Nguyen was executed for it. In these countries, mitigating circumstances where the criminal may not be fully responsible for the crime are not taken into consideration. Nguyen committed the crime to help his twin brother who was in debt. Surely, this is a situation where the government could have granted clemency, as it was clear that the offence would not be repeated, and Nguyen had even been sent to a rehabilitation centre for two years.
Death sentences should not be carried out on "... persons below eighteen years of age and...pregnant women."5. This is because children cannot be responsible for all their actions and have barely experienced life. Executing pregnant women is wrong because it terminates the baby which has done no wrong and does not deserve to die. Since 1990, eight countries are known to have executed minors - China, Congo, Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, USA and Yemen. The USA executed nineteen minors between 1990 and 2003 - more than any other country. It can be assumed that many women who have been executed for adultery in countries such as Iran were also pregnant.
It has been proved that capital punishment is not a deterrent of crime as many death penalty advocates have suggested. For instance, Canada's crime rate did not increase when it stopped using it.
The death penalty has been abolished by 123 countries; this is a majority over the 73 that still have it. Fifty countries have eliminated capital punishment from their legal system since 1985 and none of those countries have reinstated it.6 This shows that many countries now understand the significance of everyone's human rights.
In conclusion, there is no way that capital punishment can be justified in relation to human rights. Every human has the right to life and the right not to be tortured or subjected to any, cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment. The death penalty can be torture as it rarely is smooth and painless. All legal systems are fallible, so executing an innocent person is not hard to imagine happening. Corrupt politicians can use it to suit their own agendas. The death penalty does not allow criminals a chance to redeem themselves. It is bad enough that some countries have the death penalty in the first place, and even worse that some execute children and pregnant women. Legal systems need to protect the public and punish criminals, but the punishment of execution is unnecessary and immoral - it breaches human rights.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
“Everybody believes that capital punishment is wrong, but when they look at certain cases, they are quick to say, “Put them to death”, or “scream capital punishment.”” Jeff Lindsay. Capital punishment is the legally authorized killing of someone as a punishment for a crime. It has been around since time itself. In the 1700’s, The Code of Hammurabi was the first known written document there were twenty-five crimes that were punishable by death such as adultery, and helping slaves escape. Only the most heinous of those warranted such a stringent sentence. And while there are many methods that may take a prisoner's life, there are also alternatives. One must ask though, “Do those options do justice to the unspeakable acts these criminals have…
- 1322 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Capital punishment is outdated, irreversible, hypocritical, and ineffective and deterring criminals, and should therefore be abolished. There are many things wrong with executing criminals, but some of the most compelling reasons are these: it is barbaric, does not positively affect murder rates, and to put it simply, two wrongs do not make a right.…
- 863 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty is never the right choice. In America last year fifty three people were executed, and at this time in the USA over 3500 people are on death row. The amount of people on death row shows that the use of Capital punishment is not decreasing crime in America. Therefore Capital Punishment has no point. The latest country to abolish the death penalty for all crimes was Albania in early 2007. The abolition of Capital Punishment in Albania shows that the death penalty obviously doesn 't work. The country tried using it and it failed. Since 1973, there were 138 death row exonerations in the United States. That 's 138 innocent people who were mistakenly sentenced to death in a U.S. Court room, and later had their convictions overturned due to further research in light of new evidence. The fact is: the death penalty is much more of a retribution measure than a preventative measure. There is no clear cut proof that the death penalty will prevent people from killing each other…
- 1229 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Considering the death penalty is difficult for many people to do but would one consider it if it was their family that was victimized? Capital punishment has been a way to punish people for ages, and many countries still use this form of punishment on some of the worse criminals. Some of the main arguments for capital punishment include: keeping criminals off the street, reducing the crime rate, cost reduction for taxpaying citizens, and one of the most important closer for the family. One of the main reasons that people object to the death penalty in because of the fear that the wrong person could be convicted and put to death. Even though an innocent person could be wrongfully convicted, certain criminals should face the death penalty because it ensures the murderer can commit no more crime in the future and it installs fear in other potential criminals.…
- 2062 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the execution of a convicted criminal by the state as punishment for crimes known as capital crimes or capital offences. Capital punishment is a justified form of punishment for murderers and is enforced by most states. The death penalty is a fitting punishment for murder because executions maximize the public safety through a form of incapacitation and prevention. When a person kills another person, their common sense and mental reasoning is lost. As a result of this, the murderer is no longer capable of a mentally stable life not only to himself but also society as a whole. In contrast, moral issues question the accuracy and the benefits of the death penalty as well.…
- 360 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Capital punishment (death penalty) violates the United States Constitution. According to the 8th Amendment's prohibition against "cruel and unusual" punishments are inflicted. The death penalty is retribution, involves inhumane procedures, and it is an unfair way to solve problems. the death penslty is not a good way to serve justice.…
- 317 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
For instance, it is unfair to the criminals in which the evidence against them is weak and in which it was an accident. Executing a person who could possibly be innocent is morally wrong and inhumane. I believe that for the criminals to die in such a public and painful way is cruel and unusual. It is not an effective way of handing out justice. The death penalty can also keep the victim’s families stuck in an angry stage of grief. Moreover, the death penalty might bring the opposite of what survivors of crime most need; accountability, healing and closure. Those criminals have family and loved ones too. Some of them even have a wife and children, why should they suffer by seeing or knowing that their loved one is being sentenced to death?…
- 576 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Capital punishment, otherwise known as the death penalty, has been effective tool in our country’s justice system since its inception. When an inmate is given this, the harshest sentence available, it is always with just cause. Capital Punishment is an important tool in our criminal justice system today and there are several reasons it should remain in effect.…
- 1275 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Capital punishment has not been proven to deter crime and it opens the possibility of executing innocent people. That is why the United States of America should abolish the death penalty.…
- 971 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Capital punishment represents only revenge and we are all human, thus, we don’t have the right to determine who lives and who dies. There is nothing in the world that gives another human being the right to kill another, and when it’s done out of revenge, it’s worse. There is also a human rights issue as capital punishment breaks the declaration of Human Rights. This is like the government breaking its own laws. Capital punishment is stooping to the level of the criminal and killing offenders only lowers us to their standard. Is it right to punish violence with more violence? Killing another human being is wrong; “he…
- 587 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…
- 100 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Capital punishment is an issue that has been used to handle severe crimes in nearly every country either now or in the past. Even though I understand both sides of capital punishment, I can not morally say that it's good. Though many say that the death penalty is the only way to go , it can not be justified because it is not morally correct to punish people with death.…
- 729 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Capital Punishment is a difficult issue and there are as many different opinions as there are people. In this country Capital Punishment is not allowed but in America it is legal and it should not be.…
- 493 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is an execution used as a punishment on someone convicted of a capital crime. There are several ways in which these executions have been or are being made. The most common is the lethal injection, others being electrocution, hanging, lethal gas, gas chamber, and/ or the firing squad under limited circumstances. The death penalty was first used in the U.S. in colonial times therefore leading to more than 900 executions since the year of 1976 in the U.S., with the state of Texas leading the nation (“At Issue”). There are many pros and cons that are discussed about this topic that are justifiable depending on the different points of view. Some people believe that the death…
- 1261 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The death penalty is illegal in some countries and allowed in other countries in fact 72 death sentences were given out in the U.S. In the court death penalty is a sentence given to the suspect if the crime is decided to be fatal to society. In summary death penalty should be allowed because people will be treated not to do it, exterminates criminals and it will teach another citizen not to commit crimes.…
- 265 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays